Another twist in the transforming growth factor β-induced cell-cycle arrest chronicle

C. Denicourt,S. Dowdy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307282100
2003-12-15
Abstract:Members of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily of cytokines are important regulators of many fundamental cellular and developmental processes, including cell fate determination, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis (1). TGF-β also harbors a paradoxical dual role in tumorigenesis. During early tumor development, TGF-β has tumor-suppressor-like activity because of its ability to inhibit cell-cycle progression and tumor growth. However, many late-stage, dedifferentiated tumor cells become refractory to the growth inhibition mediated by TGF-β, either because of genetic loss of TGF-β signaling components or downstream perturbation of the signaling pathway (2). In addition, late-stage tumors often display increased TGF-β expression (3), which is thought to enhance the motility and metastasis potential of these cells (4). Furthermore, although TGF-β is a potent growth inhibitor to most normal epithelial cells, it can also stimulate the proliferation of some fibroblastic cell lines, such as NIH 3T3 (5). The molecular mechanisms underlying the basis of these differential responses to TGF-β have not been elucidated. However, in this issue of PNAS, Bhowmick et al. (6) have now shed some light on an important clue of alternative signaling pathways involved in TGF-β-mediated growth regulation. By analyzing the paradoxical effects of TGF-β on epithelial cells versus fibroblasts, Bhowmick et al. (6) have uncovered a TGF-β growth-inhibitory pathway that links RhoA/p160ROCK to Cdc25A and at least partially explains the different response of epithelial cells and fibroblasts to TGF-β. TGF-β signals through a heteromeric transmembrane complex composed of two type I and two type II receptor serine/threonine kinases (Fig. 1) (7). On TGF-β binding, the type I and type II receptors are brought together, resulting in the activation of the dormant kinase activity of the type I receptor. The activated type I receptor then propagates …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?