[Unrecognized lymphogranulomatosis with pulmonary involvement].

A. Ershov,N. Chaadaeva,N. B. Lavrent'eva

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Frailty in inflammatory bowel disease: analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2015–2019

Sahil Sharma,Tyler McKechnie,Luke Heimann,Yung Lee,Nalin Amin,Dennis Hong,Cagla Eskicioglu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16967

IF: 3.4

2024-04-06

Colorectal Disease

Abstract:Aim Preoperative frailty has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in various populations, but of its use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains sparse. The present study aimed to characterize the impact of frailty, as measured by the modified frailty index (mFI), on postoperative clinical and resource utilization outcomes in patients with IBD. Methods This retrospective population‐based cohort study assessed patients from the National Inpatient Sample database from 1 September 2015 to 31 December 2019. Corresponding International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Clinical Modification codes were used to identify adult patients (>18 years of age) with IBD, undergoing either small bowel resection, colectomy or proctectomy. Patient demographics and institutional data were collected for each patient to calculate the 11‐point mFI. Patients were categorized as either frail or robust using a cut‐off of 0.27. Primary outcomes were postoperative in‐hospital morbidity and mortality, whilst secondary outcomes included system‐specific morbidity, length of stay, in‐hospital healthcare costs and discharge disposition. Logistic and linear regression models were used for primary and secondary outcomes. Results Overall, 7144 patients with IBD undergoing small bowel resection, colectomy or proctectomy were identified, 337 of whom were classified as frail (i.e., mFI

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
Modified frailty index predicts postoperative morbidity in adhesive small bowel obstruction: analyzing the National Inpatient Sample 2015-2019

Gaurav Talwar,Tyler McKechnie,Yung Lee,Tania Kazi,Abdullah El-Sayes,Jessica Bogach,Dennis Hong,Cagla Eskicioglu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2023.12.007

2024-01-01

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract:BACKGROUND: There are limited data identifying predictors of postoperative outcomes in adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). This study used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to assess the efficacy of the modified frailty index (mFI) to predict postoperative morbidity among patients undergoing an operation for ASBO.METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the NIS between September 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, was performed to identify adult patients who underwent nonelective operative intervention for ASBO. The mFI was used to stratify patients as either frail (mFI value ≥ 0.27) or robust (mFI value < 0.27). The primary outcomes were overall in-hospital postoperative morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcomes were system-specific morbidity, length of stay (LOS), total in-hospital healthcare cost, and discharge disposition. Univariable and multivariable regressions were used.RESULTS: Overall, 23251 robust patients and 6122 frail patients were included. Adjusted analyses demonstrated that frail patients had increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.80-2.60), postoperative morbidity (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.52-1.74), postoperative LOS (adjusted mean difference [aMD], 0.97 days; 95% CI, 0.73-1.21), and total in-hospital healthcare costs (aMD, $18,921; 95% CI, $14,608-$23,235) and were less likely to be discharged home (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.55-0.63). The findings were unchanged on subgroup analysis of patients undergoing open operation and those older than 65 years of age.CONCLUSION: The mFI may predict postoperative outcomes for ASBO. Stratifying patients based on frailty may assist clinicians and patients in making informed decisions, setting realistic expectations, and proactively planning postoperative disposition.

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
PREVALENCE OF FRAILTY IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE. A PILOT STUDY

Maria Jesus Ballart,Francisca Grandon,Rodrigo Nieto,Manuel Alvarez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae020.063

2024-01-25

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Abstract:Abstract Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome that leads to greater vulnerability to stress, increasing the risk of adverse health outcomes. It is a dynamic process, with transitions between being robust, pre-fragile and fragile over time, suggesting that it is modifiable. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) results in altered immune function with amplified inflammation. When severe, it manifests with features associated with frailty, such as weight loss, fatigue, and sarcopenia. The first studies on frailty in IBD were carried out in a surgical context. Subsequent studies have associated frailty with increased risk of mortality as an independent factor in IBD patients. Of the available evidence, all are retrospective -except one- and the majority measures frailty with associated ICD-10 diagnoses, which can underestimate its prevalence in younger patients. There is no consensus in the literature on the best tool to measure frailty, however, this pilot study will objectively evaluate, using a risk score, the prevalence of this syndrome, which will allow, in the future, to carry out prospective studies that characterize frailty in IBD, understand the dynamic and longitudinal relationship between frailty and disease activity and, if appropriate, design and test interventions to alleviate this syndrome and its consequences in this population. This was a descriptive study, with the objective to determine the prevalence of frailty in IBD patients in a teaching hospital in Chile. We also compared the characteristics of frail vs non-frail IBD patients. Frailty was measured using SHARE-FI tool, which is a validated score to measure frailty in primary care, even in patients under 65 years of age. 64 patients were recruited, 28 had ulcerative colitis, 33 had Crohn’s disease and 3 had indeterminate colitis. 62.5% were female, with an average age of 42,3 ± 13,65 years. Average years since diagnosis were 11,6 ± 9,89. The prevalence of frailty was 40,62%. No association was observed between the presence of frailty and the type of IBD, IBD activity indices, use of corticosteroids, use of biologic therapy, surgeries associated with IBD, IBD flare-ups with hospitalization within the last year, calprotectin levels, vitamin D levels. The odds of the presence of frailty in women are 4,2 times greater than in men, being women a possible risk factor for frailty. The frailty group had worse quality life measured with the IBD Questionnaire 9 (OR 0,86 [IC95% 0,79-0,94). In conclusion, the prevalence of frailty in IBD was 40,62%. Contrary to what might be assumed, frailty turned out to be a condition independent of the type of IBD, time of evolution, activity and treatment, mostly associated with female sex and a worse quality of life. New studies are required to determine factors predisposing to frailty in IBD patients and prevent its appearance in order to improve their prognosis.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Association of Patient Frailty With Increased Morbidity After Common Ambulatory General Surgery Operations

Carolyn D. Seib,Holly Rochefort,Kathryn Chomsky-Higgins,Jessica E. Gosnell,Insoo Suh,Wen T. Shen,Quan-Yang Duh,Emily Finlayson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4007

2018-02-01

JAMA Surgery

Abstract:Importance: Frailty is a measure of decreased physiological reserve that is associated with morbidity and mortality in major elective and emergency general surgery operations, independent of chronological age. To date, the association of frailty with outcomes in ambulatory general surgery has not been established.Objective: To determine the association between frailty and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing ambulatory general surgery operations.Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 140 828 patients older than 40 years of age from the 2007-2010 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File who underwent ambulatory and 23-hour-stay hernia, breast, thyroid, or parathyroid surgery. Data analysis was performed from August 18, 2016, to June 21, 2017.Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program modified frailty index and perioperative morbidity was determined via multivariable logistic regression with random-effects modeling to control for clustering within Current Procedural Terminology codes.Results: A total of 140 828 patients (80 147 women and 60 681 men; mean [SD] age, 59.3 [12.0] years) underwent ambulatory hernia (n = 71 455), breast (n = 51 267), thyroid, or parathyroid surgery (n = 18 106). Of these patients, 2457 (1.7%) experienced any type of perioperative complication and 971 (0.7%) experienced serious perioperative complications. An increasing modified frailty index was associated with a stepwise increase in the incidence of complications. In multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, anesthesia type, tobacco use, renal failure, corticosteroid use, and clustering by Current Procedural Terminology codes, an intermediate modified frailty index score (0.18-0.35, corresponding to 2-3 frailty traits) was associated with statistically significant odds ratios of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.54-1.88; P < .001) for any complication and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.72-2.34; P < .001) for serious complications. A high modified frailty index score (≥0.36, corresponding to ≥4 frailty traits) was associated with statistically significant odds ratios of 3.35 (95% CI, 2.52-4.46; P < .001) for any complication and 3.95 (95% CI, 2.65-5.87; P < .001) for serious complications. Anesthesia with local and monitored anesthesia care was the only modifiable covariate associated with decreased odds of serious 30-day complications, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.81; P < .001).Conclusions and Relevance: Frailty is associated with increased perioperative morbidity in common ambulatory general surgery operations, independent of age, type of anesthesia, and other comorbidities. Surgeons should consider frailty rather than chronological age when counseling and selecting patients for elective ambulatory surgery.

surgery
Bifurcate mechanism and field emission of novel top branched carbon nanotube

Xiuxia Zhang,Xin Li,Changchun Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/NEMS.2006.334680

Abstract:In this paper, novel top branched carbon nanotube (TBCNT) were discovered by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). This new kind TBCNT was grown directly on tungsten wire by pyrolysis of FePc. At 1123 K FePc can be decompounded into C, Fe and other elements, the deposition site of C atom was calculated when FePc be decompound in test, and the growth of TBCNT was experimented according the result of calculation. The growth technique of TBCNT was carefully researched. The bifurcate mechanism was analyzed according the crystal and dynamical theories. The field emission characteristic of the TBCNT film was measured, the measured result indicated that the TBCNT film cathode can be used as traffic pilot signals, colored message or a pixel of giant screen display. Using the TBCNT film cathode, we fabricated a novel cylinder-shaped structure field emission lighting tube (FELT)
The Composite Risk Index Based on Frailty Predicts Postoperative Complications in Older Patients Recovering from Elective Digestive Tract Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Li, Chun-Qing,Zhang, Chen,Yu, Fan,Li, Xue-Ying,Wang, Dong-Xin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01549-6

IF: 2.376

2022-01-01

BMC Anesthesiology

Abstract:Abstract Background Limitations exist in available studies investigating effect of preoperative frailty on postoperative outcomes. This study was designed to analyze the association between composite risk index, an accumulation of preoperative frailty deficits, and the risk of postoperative complications in older patients recovering from elective digestive tract surgery. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study. Baseline and perioperative data of older patients (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent elective digestive tract surgery from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 were collected. The severity of frailty was assessed with the composite risk index, a composite of frailty deficits including modified frailty index. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of postoperative complications during hospital stay. The association between the composite risk index and the risk of postoperative complications was assessed with a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 923 patients were included. Of these, 27.8% (257) developed postoperative complications. Four frailty deficits, i.e., modified frailty index ≥0.27, malnutrition, hemoglobin < 90 g/L, and albumin ≤30 g/L, were combined to generate a composite risk index. Multivariable analysis showed that, when compared with patients with composite risk index of 0, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 2.408 (1.714–3.383, P < 0.001) for those with a composite risk index of 1, 3.235 (1.985–5.272, P < 0.001) for those with a composite risk index of 2, and 9.227 (3.568–23.86, P < 0.001) for those with composite risk index of 3 or above. The area under receiver-operator characteristic curve to predict postoperative complications was 0.653 (95% confidence interval 0.613–0.694, P < 0.001) for composite risk index compared with 0.622 (0.581–0.663, P < 0.001) for modified frailty index. Conclusion For older patients following elective digestive tract surgery, high preoperative composite risk index, a combination of frailty deficits, was independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.
Predictors of postoperative overall and severe complications after surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: The role of the fragility index

Andrea Giannini,Violante Di Donato,Michele C. Schiavi,James May,Pierluigi Benedetti Panici,Mario A. Congiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13020

2019-11-17

Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of obesity, comorbidities, and fragility on overall and severe complication rate and survival among patients surgically treated for endometrial cancer. MethodsConsecutive patients with endometrial cancer treated at the Royal Infirmary Hospital of Edinburgh from June 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017, were retrospectively enrolled in an observational study. Considering pre‐existing medical conditions, comorbidities, and complications, modified fragility index (mFI) was calculated. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predicting variables of overall (G1–G4) and severe (G3–G4) complication rate. ResultsOne hundred patients were surgically treated for endometrial cancer. Elevated mFI >3 was related to a statistically higher access rate to the high dependency unit (HDU) or intensive care unit (ITU) (33.3% vs 6.6%, P=0.013). Overall, 31% of women had postoperative complications. Using multivariate analysis, it was shown that undergoing laparotomy (odds ratio [OR] 7.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.52–19.71; P<0.001) and having an mFI >3 (OR 7.19, 95% CI 1.43–36.25; P=0.021) were independent predictors of overall complications (G1–G4). Moreover, only smoking (OR 5.01, 95% CI 1.15–21.75; P=0.031) and mFI >3 (OR 5.16, 95% CI 1.07–24.94; P=0.047) were independent factors for severe complications (G3–G4). ConclusionModified fragility index was an important predictor of complications among patients treated for endometrial cancer and could be a useful tool for assisting clinicians in perioperative management.

obstetrics & gynecology
External Validation of the Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) in the Scoli-RISK-1 Patient Database

Emily K. Miller,Lawrence G. Lenke,Brian J. Neuman,Daniel M. Sciubba,Khaled M. Kebaish,Justin S. Smith,Yong Qiu,Benny T. Dahl,Ferran Pellise,Yukihiro Matsuyama,Leah Y. Carreon,Michael G. Fehlings,Kenneth M. Cheung,Stephen Lewis,Mark B. Dekutoski,Frank J. Schwab,Oheneba Boachie-Adjei,Hossein Mehdian,Shay Bess,Christopher I. Shaffrey,Christopher P. Ames

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002717

2018-01-01

Abstract:Study Design. Analysis of a prospective multicenter database. Objective. To assess the ability of the recently created Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) to predict odds of major complications and length of hospital stay for patients who had more severe preoperative deformity and underwent more invasive ASD surgery compared with patients in the database used to create the index. Summary of Background Data. Accurate preoperative estimates of risk are necessary given the high complication rates currently associated with ASD surgery. Methods. Patients were enrolled by participating institutions in Europe, Asia, and North America from 2009 to 2011. ASD-FI scores were used to classify 267 patients as not frail (NF) (<0.3), frail (0.3–0. 5), or severely frail (SF) (>0.5). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for preoperative and surgical covariates such as operative time and blood loss, was performed to determine the relationship between ASD-FI category and incidence of major complications, overall incidence of complications, and length of hospital stay. Results. The mean ASD-FI score was 0.3 (range, 0–0.7). We categorized 105 patients as NF, 103 as frail, and 59 as SF. The adjusted odds of developing a major complication were higher for SF patients (odds ratio = 4.4; 95% CI 2.0, 9.9) compared with NF patients. After adjusting for covariates, length of hospital stay for SF patients increased by 19% (95% CI 1.4%, 39%) compared with NF patients. The odds of developing a major complication or having increased length of stay were similar between frail and NF patients. Conclusion. Greater patient frailty, as measured by the ASD-FI, is associated with a longer hospital stay and greater risk of major complications among patients who have severe preoperative deformity and undergo invasive surgical procedures. Level of Evidence: 2
Modified Frailty Index-5 Score and Post-Operative Infectious Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Intestinal-Cutaneous Fistula: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Osaid Alser,Ander Dorken Gallastegi,Mathias A Christensen,Hassan Mashbari,Noelle Saillant,Jonathan Parks,April Mendoza,Peter Fagenholz,David King,John Hwabejire,Haytham M A Kaafarani,George C Velmahos,Jason A Fawley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2020.441

Abstract:Background: Post-operative infectious complications after repair of intestinal-cutaneous fistulas (ICF) represent a substantial burden and these outcomes vary widely in the literature. We aimed to evaluate the use of the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) to account for physiologic reserve to predict infectious complications in patients with ICF undergoing operative repair. Methods: We used the American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2006-2017 dataset to include patients who underwent ICF repair. The main outcome measure was 30-day infectious complications (surgical site infection [SSI], sepsis, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection [UTI]). The risk of 30-day post-operative infectious complications was assessed based on mFI-5 score. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the association between infectious complications and mFI-5. Results: We identified 4,197 patients who underwent an ICF repair. The median age (interquartile range [IQR]) was 57 (46, 67) years, and the majority of patients were female (2,260; 53.9%); white (3,348; 79.8%); and 1,586 (38.3%) were obese. After adjustment for relevant confounders such as baseline patient characteristics, and operative details, mFI-5 was independently associated with infectious complications (odds ratio [OR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.21), particularly SSI (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.28-3.63) and pneumonia (OR, 5.31; 95% CI, 2.29-12.35), but not UTI or sepsis. Conclusions: We showed that the mFI-5 is a strong predictor of infectious complications after ICF repair. It can be utilized to account for physiologic reserve, therefore reducing the variability of outcomes reported for ICF repair.
Association of Frailty with Delayed Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function after Elective Colorectal Cancer Resections

Wenbin Gong,Xing Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2018.1524528

2018-11-15

Journal of Investigative Surgery

Abstract:Frailty is characterized by a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis after a stressor event and is a consequence of age-related decline in many physiological systems during a lifetime. To access the association between frailty and delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resections, 241 patients who had undergone elective colorectal cancer resections from July 2015 to August 2017 were investigated. The association of frailty with delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function, length of stay (LOS), and whether or not to transfer into intensive care unit (ICU) were analyzed. For the entire cohort, 164 (68.0%) of total patients experienced the early recovery of gastrointestinal function, 67 (27.8%) delayed recovery, and 10 (4.1%) patients occurred postoperative ileus (POI) or anastomotic leakage (AL). Low Modified Frailty Index (mFI) score was associated with statistically decreased odds ratios of 0.276 (95% CI, 0.095-0.808; p = 0.019) for delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function or even the occurrence of POI or AL, and shorter LOS of 1.058 (95%CI, 1.024-1.216; p = 0.039) compared with those of high mFI scores. However, mFI scores were not predictive of transferring into ICU (OR, 1.103; 95% CI, 0.808-1.507; p = 0.44). Frailty was associated with increased odds of delayed gastrointestinal function recovery or even the occurrence of POI or AL. Moreover, higher mFI was also associated with longer LOS, but was not predictive of whether or not transferring into ICU.

surgery
Impact of frailty on short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yao Zhou,Xiao-Lei Zhang,Hong-Xia Ni,Tian-Jing Shao,Ping Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.893

2024-03-27

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract:BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a major global health challenge that predominantly affects older people. Surgical management, despite advancements, requires careful consideration of preoperative patient status for optimal outcomes. AIM To summarize existing evidence on the association of frailty with short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases for observational studies in adult patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing planned or elective colorectal surgery for primary carcinoma and/or secondary metastasis. Only studies that conducted frailty assessment using recognized frailty assessment tools and had a comparator group, comprising nonfrail patients, were included. Pooled effect sizes were reported as weighted mean difference or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS A total of 24 studies were included. Compared with nonfrail patients, frailty was associated with an increased risk of mortality at 30 d (RR: 1.99, 95%CI: 1.47–2.69), at 90 d (RR: 4.76, 95%CI: 1.56–14.6) and at 1 year (RR: 5.73, 95%CI: 2.74–12.0) of follow up. Frail patients had an increased risk of any complications (RR: 1.81, 95%CI: 1.57–2.10) as well as major complications (Clavien–Dindo classification grade ≥ III) (RR: 2.87, 95%CI: 1.65–4.99) compared with the control group. The risk of reoperation (RR: 1.18, 95%CI: 1.07–1.31), readmission (RR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.36–2.12), need for blood transfusion (RR: 1.67, 95%CI: 1.52–1.85), wound complications (RR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.11–1.99), delirium (RR: 4.60, 95%CI: 2.31–9.16), risk of prolonged hospitalization (RR: 2.09, 95%CI: 1.22–3.60) and discharge to a skilled nursing facility or rehabilitation center (RR: 3.19, 95%CI: 2.0–5.08) was all higher in frail patients. CONCLUSION Frailty in colorectal cancer surgery patients was associated with more complications, longer hospital stays, higher reoperation risk, and increased mortality. Integrating frailty assessment appears crucial for tailored surgical management.

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
Frailty Assessment for Risk Stratification in Pancreatic Surgery – Results of a Single-Center Cohort Study

M Frey,E Krombholz,S Patalong,A Wirsching,A Nocito

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae118.032

2024-05-01

Abstract:Abstract Background Large cohort studies found an increase in frailty with age. Age is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Seventy percent of new diagnoses are made in patients aged more than 65 years. Pancreatic resections represent the only hope for cure but are associated with high morbidity. The definition “fit for pancreatic surgery”, currently mainly based on age and comorbidities, is continuously challenged. Aims The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes after pancreatic resections. Methods Data of consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resections between January 2015 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo Classification, Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and complications specific to pancreatic resections as recommended and published by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. The modified frailty index (mFI) was defined by 11 variables. An mFI score above 0.27 was set to define frailty. Results A pancreatic resection was performed in 159 patients, of which 23 (15%) were classified as frail. Pancreatoduodenectomies were similarly distributed in both groups. Frail patients were older (median of 74 vs. 69 years). Male gender was associated with frailty (83%, p=0.001)., Moreover, frailty was associated with an increased rate of preoperative biliary drainage. Although intensive care stay was increased in the frail group (median 3 vs. 0 days; p=0.01), total length of hospital stay was not affected. Frailty was associated with severe complications as defined by a comprehensive complication index >50 (35% vs. 10%; p=0.003), an increased rate of severe type C pancreatic fistula (13% vs. 2%, p=0.04), and a higher 90-day mortality (13% vs. 2%, p=0.04). Conclusion Assessment of frailty should be used for preoperative risk stratification since frailty is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resections.
Association of Frailty with Healthcare Utilization for Patients over One Year Following Surgical Evaluation

Stephen J. Flinn,David S. Silver,Jacob Hodges,Andrew L. Bilderback,Dan Buchanan,Justin M. Ludwig,James Schuster,Daniel E. Hall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006218

IF: 13.787

2024-01-24

Annals of Surgery

Abstract:Objective: Characterize the distribution of healthcare utilization associated with pre-operative frailty in the year following evaluation by a surgeon. Summary Background Data: Frailty is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and costs for surgical patients. However, the total financial burden for frail patients beyond the index surgery and inpatient stay remains unknown. Methods: Prospective cohort assembled from February 2016 to December 2020 within a multi-hospital integrated healthcare delivery and finance system (IDFS), from patients evaluated with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) of frailty. Inclusion criteria: age greater than 18, valid RAI, membership in the IDFS Health Plan. Data were stratified by frailty and surgical status. Results: The mean (SD) age was 54.7 (16.1) and 58.2% female of the cohort (n=86,572). For all patients with reimbursement for surgery (n=53,856), frail and very frail patients incurred respective increases of 8% ( P =0.027) and 29% ( P <0.001) on utilization relative to the normal group. Robust patients saw a 52% ( P <0.001) decrease. This pattern was more pronounced in the cohort without surgery (n=32,716). The increase over normal utilization for frail and very frail patients increased to 23% ( P =0.004) and 68% ( P <0.001), respectively. Utilization among robust patients decreased 62% ( P <0.001). Increases among the frail were primarily due to increased inpatient medical and post-acute care services (all P <0.001). Conclusions: Patient frailty is associated with increased total healthcare utilization, primarily via increased inpatient medical and post-acute care following surgery. Quantifying these frailty-related financial burdens may inform clinical decision making as well as the design of value-based reimbursement strategies.

surgery
Impact of Controlled Versus Uncontrolled mFI-5 Frailty on Perioperative Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Jarod Olson,Kevin C Mo,Jessica Schmerler,Wesley M Durand,Khaled M Kebaish,Richard L Skolasky,Brian J Neuman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001595

2024-03-27

Abstract:Study design: Retrospective review. Objectives: We substratified the mFI-5 frailty index to reflect controlled and uncontrolled conditions and assess their relationship to perioperative complications. Summary of background data: Risk assessment before adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is critical because the surgery is highly invasive with a high complication rate. Although frailty is associated with risk of surgical complications, current frailty measures do not differentiate between controlled and uncontrolled conditions. Methods: Frailty was calculated using the mFI-5 index for 170 ASD patients with fusion of ≥5 levels. Uncontrolled frailty was defined as blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, HbA1C >7% or postprandial glucose >180 mg/dL, or recent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, while on medication. Patients were divided into nonfrailty, controlled frailty, and uncontrolled frailty cohorts. The primary outcome measure was perioperative major and wound complications. Bivariate analysis was performed. Multivariable analysis assessed the relationship between frailty and perioperative complications. Results: The cohorts included 97 nonfrail, 54 controlled frail, and 19 uncontrolled frail patients. Compared with nonfrail patients, patients with uncontrolled frailty were more likely to have age older than 60 years (84% vs. 24%), hyperlipidemia (42% vs. 20%), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score >42 (84% vs. 52%) (P<0.05 for all). Controlled frailty was associated with those older than 60 years (41% vs. 24%) and hyperlipidemia (52% vs. 20%) (P<0.05 for all). On multivariable regression analysis controlling for hyperlipidemia, functional independence, motor weakness, ODI>42, and age older than 60 years, patients with uncontrolled frailty had greater odds of major complications (OR 4.24, P=0.03) and wound complications (OR 9.47, P=0.046) compared with nonfrail patients. Controlled frailty was not associated with increased risk of perioperative complications (P>0.05 for all). Conclusions: Although patients with uncontrolled frailty had higher risk of perioperative complications compared with nonfrail patients, patients with controlled frailty did not, suggesting the importance of controlling modifiable risk factors before surgery. Level of evidence: 3.
Frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale to predict short- and long-term adverse outcomes following emergency laparotomy: meta-analysis

Brittany Park,Zena Alani,Edrick Sulistio,Ahmed W H Barazanchi,Jonathan Koea,Alain Vandal,Andrew G Hill,Andrew D MacCormick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae078

2024-07-02

BJS Open

Abstract:Abstract Background Emergency laparotomy has high morbidity and mortality rates. Frailty assessment remains underutilized in this setting, in part due to time constraints and feasibility. The Clinical Frailty Scale has been identified as the most appropriate tool for frailty assessment in emergency laparotomy patients and is recommended for all older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The prognostic impact of measured frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale on short- and long-term mortality and morbidity rates remains to be determined. Methods Observational cohort studies were identified by systematically searching Medline, Embase, Scopus and CENTRAL databases up to February 2024, comparing outcomes following emergency laparotomy for frail and non-frail participants defined according to the Clinical Frailty Scale. The primary outcomes were short- and long-term mortality rates. A random-effects model was created with pooling of effect estimates and a separate narrative synthesis was created. Risk of bias was assessed. Results Twelve articles comprising 5704 patients were included. Frailty prevalence was 25% in all patients and 32% in older adults (age ≥55 years). Older patients with frailty had a significantly greater risk of postoperative death (30-day mortality rate OR 3.84, 95% c.i. 2.90 to 5.09, 1-year mortality rate OR 3.03, 95% c.i. 2.17 to 4.23). Meta-regression revealed that variations in cut-off values to define frailty did not significantly affect the association with frailty and 30-day mortality rate. Frailty was associated with higher rates of major complications (OR 1.93, 95% c.i. 1.27 to 2.93) and discharge to an increased level of care. Conclusion Frailty is significantly correlated with short- and long-term mortality rates following emergency laparotomy, as well as an adverse morbidity rate and functional outcomes. Identifying frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale may aid in patient-centred decision-making and implementation of tailored care strategies for these ‘high-risk’ patients, with the aim of reducing adverse outcomes following emergency laparotomy.

surgery
[A reply on Region Skane: necessary structural changes will not benefit by victim-mentality at small hospitals].

J. Persson,S. Rydén

2003-11-13

Abstract:
283. MODIFIED FRAILTY INDEX AND CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE TOOLS ARE NOT GOOD PREDICTORS OF SURVIVAL AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

Kaso Ari,Sri Sivarajan,Sachin Shenoy,Martyn Patel,Bhaskar Kumar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.058

2024-09-01

Diseases of the Esophagus

Abstract:Abstract Background Assessing frailty in elderly patients is pivotal for preoperative risk stratification. Whilst the modified Frailty-Index (m-FI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) have been used to predict postoperative mortality and morbidity in various surgical contexts, their prognostic value for complications and overall survival following esophagectomy remains uncertain. Several studies have assessed pre-operative application of frailty indices and whether they have prognostic value for long-term postoperative outcomes, however, none have compared m-FI and CFS in patients undergoing esophagectomy. This study examines and compares m-FI and CFS with overall survival and post-operative complications in patients undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIO). Methods We retrospectively analysed data from a prospectively maintained database, including patients aged ≥65 years undergoing MIO for esophageal cancer from January 2014 to December 2023, at a high-volume esophago-gastric tertiary centre. We compared the m-FI 11 and m-FI 5, CFS, all measuring frailty parameters in surgical patients. Frailty was defined as m-FI 11 ≥3, m-FI 5 ≥2, or CFS ≥4, based on the current literature evidence for application of these frailty assessment tools. Primary outcomes were 2- and 5-year all-cause mortality, with anastomotic leak, serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) and average length of stay (LOS) as secondary outcomes. Results Among 174 patients (median age 72 years, range 65-85, male-to-female ratio 4:1), no significant associations were found between age, sex, TNM stage, and pre/post-op chemoradiotherapy within each scoring category. Neither tool showed significant associations for 2-, 5-year, and overall mortality (Table 1), nor for average length of stay. However, an m-FI 5 score ≥2 exhibited an odds ratio (OR) of 2.41 (95% CI 1.00–5.78, p = 0.049) for anastomotic leak, and a CFS score ≥4 had an OR of 2.46 (95% CI 1.02–5.90, p = 0.044) for serious complications. Conclusion In frail patients undergoing MIO, both the m-FI and CFS tools demonstrated no significant prognostic value for predicting overall survival. However, m-FI 5 ≥2 correlated significantly with anastomotic leaks, while CFS ≥4 correlated with serious complications. Relying on scoring tools for frailty assessment may inadvertently trivialise what is intended to be a multidimensional evaluation of health domains. Nevertheless, their utility in predicting complications should not be overlooked. We propose a more strategic use of frailty assessment tools to triage patients for comprehensive geriatric evaluation. This approach identifies patients at highest risk of complications and facilitates targeted prehabilitation for optimising outcomes.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Postoperative Recovery in Frail, Pre-frail, and Non-frail Elderly Patients Following Abdominal Surgery

Tarifin Sikder,Nadia Sourial,Geva Maimon,Mehdi Tahiri,Debby Teasdale,Howard Bergman,Shannon A. Fraser,Sebastian Demyttenaere,Simon Bergman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4801-9

IF: 3.282

2018-09-18

World Journal of Surgery

Abstract:BackgroundThe objective of this study is to explore the association between frailty and surgical recovery over a 6-month period, in elderly patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.MethodsA total of 144 patients were categorized as frail, pre-frail, and non-frail based on five criteria: weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slowness, and low activity. Recovery to preoperative functional status (activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)), cognition, quality of life, and mental health was assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. A repeated measure logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of frailty on recovery over time. The effect of frailty on hospitalization outcomes was also evaluated.ResultsMean age was 78 ± 5 years with 17.4% of patients categorized as frail, 60.4% pre-frail, and 22.2% non-frail. At 6 months, the percent of patients who had recovered to preoperative values were: ADL 90%; IADL 76%; cognition 75.5%; mental health 66%; and quality of life 70%. While more frail patients experienced adverse hospitalization outcomes and fewer had recovered to preoperative functional status, these differences were not found to be statistically significant. Overall, frailty status was not significantly associated with the trajectory of recovery or hospitalization outcomes.ConclusionStrong, institutional commitment to quality surgical care, as well as appropriate strategies for older patients, may have mitigated the impact of frailty on recovery. Further research is needed to examine the role of frailty in the surgical recovery process.

surgery
Frail Patients Undergoing Optimization Before Surgery: Preliminary Results

Lauren T Hui,Diane St Pierre,Richard S Miller,Diane St. Pierre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000000965

2024-03-15

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract:BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 10% or more of patients older than 65 years are affected by frailty, a mental and physical state of vulnerability to adverse surgical outcomes. Frailty can be assessed using the Edmonton Frailty Scale: a reliable and convenient multidimensional assessment before surgery. The correlation between frailty score, presurgical optimization, and surgical outcomes was investigated in this preliminary pilot study. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed on patients referred to the surgical optimization clinic and assessed for frailty from September 2020 to May 2023. Patients received presurgical optimization for reasons including diabetes, smoking cessation, prehabilitation and nutrition, and/or cardiopulmonary issues. Outcomes were evaluated whether they proceeded to surgery, were referred to the High-Risk Surgical Committee, surgical case canceled, or not scheduled. For those who proceeded to surgery, infection rates, complications, and 30-day emergency department (ED) and readmission rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 143 unique patients, 138 (men = 61, women = 77) were evaluated for this study. The average Edmonton frailty score for patients who proceeded to surgery was 7.013 (n = 78) vs 9.389 with cancelation and 9.600 for not scheduled or not optimized for surgery. Postoperative infection rates were <3%. However, 30-day ED and readmission rate was 21% (16 of 78). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lower average Edmonton frailty scores were more likely to proceed to surgery, whereas those with higher average Edmonton frailty scores were more likely to have surgery canceled or delayed. Frail patients cleared for surgery were found to have a high 30-day ED and readmission rate.

surgery
Evaluating frailty using the modified frailty index for colonic diverticular disease surgery: analysis of the national inpatient sample 2015–2019

Tyler McKechnie,Ghazal Jessani,Noor Bakir,Yung Lee,Niv Sne,Aristithes Doumouras,Dennis Hong,Cagla Eskicioglu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10965-x

2024-06-16

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract:Frailty has been associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity; however, the use of the modified frailty index (mFI-11) to assess patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease has not been widely assessed. This paper aims to examine frailty, evaluated by mFI-11, to assess postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing operative intervention for colonic diverticular disease.

surgery

[Unrecognized lymphogranulomatosis with pulmonary involvement].

Frailty in inflammatory bowel disease: analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2015–2019

Modified frailty index predicts postoperative morbidity in adhesive small bowel obstruction: analyzing the National Inpatient Sample 2015-2019

PREVALENCE OF FRAILTY IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE. A PILOT STUDY

Association of Patient Frailty With Increased Morbidity After Common Ambulatory General Surgery Operations

Bifurcate mechanism and field emission of novel top branched carbon nanotube

The Composite Risk Index Based on Frailty Predicts Postoperative Complications in Older Patients Recovering from Elective Digestive Tract Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Predictors of postoperative overall and severe complications after surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: The role of the fragility index

External Validation of the Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) in the Scoli-RISK-1 Patient Database

Modified Frailty Index-5 Score and Post-Operative Infectious Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Intestinal-Cutaneous Fistula: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Association of Frailty with Delayed Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function after Elective Colorectal Cancer Resections

Impact of frailty on short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Frailty Assessment for Risk Stratification in Pancreatic Surgery – Results of a Single-Center Cohort Study

Association of Frailty with Healthcare Utilization for Patients over One Year Following Surgical Evaluation

Impact of Controlled Versus Uncontrolled mFI-5 Frailty on Perioperative Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale to predict short- and long-term adverse outcomes following emergency laparotomy: meta-analysis

[A reply on Region Skane: necessary structural changes will not benefit by victim-mentality at small hospitals].

283. MODIFIED FRAILTY INDEX AND CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE TOOLS ARE NOT GOOD PREDICTORS OF SURVIVAL AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

Postoperative Recovery in Frail, Pre-frail, and Non-frail Elderly Patients Following Abdominal Surgery

Frail Patients Undergoing Optimization Before Surgery: Preliminary Results

Evaluating frailty using the modified frailty index for colonic diverticular disease surgery: analysis of the national inpatient sample 2015–2019