Transcriptional repression by AML 1 and LEF-1 is mediated by the TLE y Groucho corepressors
D. Levanon,R. Goldstein,Y. Bernstein,Hua Tang,D. Goldenberg,S. Stifani,Z. Paroush,Y. Groner
Abstract:The mammalian AMLyCBFa runt domain (RD) transcription factors regulate hematopoiesis and osteoblast differentiation. Like their Drosophila counterparts, most mammalian RD proteins terminate in a common pentapeptide, VWRPY, which serves to recruit the corepressor Groucho (Gro). Using a yeast two-hybrid assay, in vitro association and pull-down experiments, we demonstrate that Gro and its mammalian homolog TLE1 specifically interact with AML1 and AML2. In addition to the VWRPY motif, other C-terminal sequences are required for these interactions with GroyTLE1. TLE1 inhibits AML1-dependent transactivation of the T cell receptor (TCR) enhancers a and b, which contain functional AML binding sites, in transfected Jurkat T cells. LEF-1 is an additional transcription factor that mediates transactivation of TCR enhancers. LEF-1 and its Drosophila homolog Pangolin (Pan) are involved in the WntyWg signaling pathway through interactions with the coactivator b-catenin and its highly conserved fly homolog Armadillo (Arm). We show that TLEy Gro interacts with LEF-1 and Pan, and inhibits LEF-1:bcatenin-dependent transcription. These data indicate that, in addition to their activity as transcriptional activators, AML1 and LEF-1 can act, through recruitment of the corepressor TLE1, as transcriptional repressors in TCR regulation and WntyWg signaling. The AML genes (also termed CBFa or PEBP2a) are members of a gene family of heterodimeric transcription factors. Family members contain a highly conserved region of 128 aa designated the ‘‘runt domain’’ (RD), because of its homology to a region in the Drosophila Runt protein (1). The RD mediates both AML heterodimerization with the CBFb protein and the binding of AML to its consensus DNA target sequence PyGPyGGT (1–4). In humans and mice, three highly conserved AML genes have been identified (2–4): AML1 on chromosome 21q22.1, AML2 on chromosome 1p36, and AML3 on chromosome 6p21 (5, 6). Homozygous disruption of AML1 and AML3 in mice indicated that AML1 plays a crucial role in hematopoiesis (7, 8) whereas AML3 is essential for osteogenesis (9, 10). Importantly, AML1 and CBFb genes are the most frequent targets for leukemia-associated translocations (11), further highlighting the pivotal role of these genes in hematopoiesis. The expression of AML1 is regulated by two distinct promoters and involves complex patterns of alternative splicing (12), resulting in a diverse collection of mRNAs of differentsized coding regions (188–480 aa) (13, 14). The longer proteins contain a transactivation domain (TAD) and a nuclear matrix targeting signal (15) downstream of the RD, whereas in the shorter forms the TAD is missing (2). Of interest, we have recently shown that the short isoform AML1-d, lacking part of the TAD, was capable of suppressing in vivo tumor growth and differentiation (16). Consistent with their expression patterns and knockout mouse phenotypes, AML binding sites are present in promoter regulatory regions of several hematopoietic and bone-specific genes (2, 4). Characterization of AML interactions within these promoter regions revealed that AML1 activates transcription in a context-dependent manner involving contacts with adjacently bound transcription factors (2, 4). For example, on the T cell receptor (TCR) a enhancer, AML1 associates with the adjacently bound transcription factor Ets-1, and together with LEF-1 interacts with the nonDNA-binding protein ALY, which acts as a LEF-1yAML1 coactivator in this context (17, 18). LEF-1 is also a target of the WntyWg signaling pathway (19). Wnt signaling allows the translocation of cytoplasmatically tethered b-catenin into the nucleus, where it directly interacts with LEF-1, stimulating LEF-1-dependent transcriptional activation (19). As noted before (2), most AML proteins that contain full-length TAD terminate with an identical C-terminal VWRPY motif. This pentapeptide is similar in position and sequence to the WRPW motif found in Hairy-related basic helix–loop–helix transcription factors (20). It has been shown that in the Hairy-related basic helix–loop–helix repressors, WRPW serves to recruit the corepressor Groucho (Gro) (21, 22). More recently, Aronson et al. (23) showed that the VWRPY sequence is required for Gro interactions with Runty PEBP2aB. The Drosophila Gro and its human homologs TLE1–4 (24) are widely expressed nuclear proteins that do not bind to DNA, but include WD repeats that are implicated in protein–protein interactions (25). Gro proteins are general transcriptional corepressors that mediate repression by a variety of specific DNA-binding proteins (25). It is thought that DNA-bound transcription factors interact with and recruit GroyTLE to target promoters, however, the mechanism by which TLEyGro bring about transcriptional repression remains unknown. Here we demonstrate direct interactions between GroyTLE and the AML1, AML2 and LEF-1 proteins and show that these interactions lead to transcriptional repression of AMLand LEF-1-regulated target genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Yeast Interaction Assays. Yeast interaction trap assays were performed essentially as described (21, 26). Yeast strains were transformed with the activation domain-AML fused proteins cloned into the 2 m TRP1 plasmid pJG4–5, which allows galactose-dependent expression. Individual transformant colThe publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. © 1998 by The National Academy of Sciences 0027-8424y98y9511590-6$2.00y0 PNAS is available online at www.pnas.org. Abbreviations: RD, runt domain; TCR, T cell receptor; TAD, transactivation domain; GST, glutathione S-transferase. §To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail: lvgroner@ weizmann.weizmann.ac.il.