MRSA: major problem or minor threat?

B. Cookson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-38-5-309

1993-05-01

Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract:Staphylococcus aureus strains that are resistant to methicillin (MRSA) and, often, other antistaphylococcal agents, provide a considerable challenge to infection control teams throughout the world, and several control guidelines have been pub1ished.l. However, there are many unresolved questions, not least the feasibility or sense in attempting to control MRSA. S. aureus has always been a versatile pathogen3 with an irritating tendency to disprove many generalisations. The prevalence of MRSA characteristically varies in different countries, cities and even within a hospital4 It is probable that there is similar variation in the community and other institutions, such as homes for the elderly, although information is lacking. International transfer of MRSA carried on patients and staff is well recognised4t5 and opportunities are likely to increase as patients travel to other countries for treatment, or develop infections whilst on business or vacation. Moreover, European Community (EC) regulations that enable staff to work abroad more easily and the disappearance of national barriers, particularly in Eastern and Western Europe, may ease the spread 'of resistant micro-organisms. Typing of MRSA plays an important part in clarifying the suspected epidemiology of outbreaks, and in evaluating the success or failure of control measures. Although some of the genes involved in methicillin resistance are probably on transposons, evolutionary diversity seems to be uncommon among MRSA, at least in those strains causing epidemics of infe~tion.~ Such strains pose a severe test for any typing system, and simple systems often produce as much information as modern molecular techniqued 9 The key point is whether the requirement is to type isolates and build up a large data base suitable for inter-laboratory comparisons, or merely to distinguish between a relatively small number of local isolates. Much work is required to standardise the more recent typing methods, and objective analysis of the gels is also required, as has been achieved with SDS-PAGE of proteins. * There are some who feel that the virulence of MRSA has been greatly exaggerated. We do not fully understand the nature of virulence in S. aureus. It is likely to be an interaction of many seed factors within a soil of varying susceptibility and exposed to different or changing climatic conditions. Lacey and co-worker~~ discussed their experience with an MRSA of low virulence on a bums unit. That strain was unusual in that it lacked lipase and was a weak producer of clumping (slide coagulase) factor and protein A, all purported virulence factors. Virulence factors linked with phagelo have been found in a strain circulating in the UK (the so-called " EMRSA1 ") and in epidemic MRSA from eastem Australiall and may thus be expected to vary between, or even during, MRSA outbreaks. However, we cannot provide reliable predictors of virulence in the laboratory. Although several units have experienced outbreaks similar to that described by Lacey et al., on other occasions MRSA has caused considerable morbidity and mortality.* Nevertheless, it is interesting that MRSA rarely cause the primary sepsis in healthy staff seen with the infamous 80/81 strain of S. aureus of the 1950s. Clearly, certain MRSA express epidemic potential, but the identification of reliable laboratory markers has eluded research efforts. Experience would suggest that the answer to this question also lies in the interaction between the seed, the soil and the climate. EMRSA-1 (perhaps the archetypal epidemic MRSA) does not necessarily spread when introduced into a hospital setting.12 We need to know more about the reasons for failure and success of MRSA c o n t r 0 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l3