Association of Phenotypic Aging Marker with comorbidities, frailty and inflammatory markers in people living with HIV

Win Min Han,Tanakorn Apornpong,Sivaporn Gatechompol,Sasiwimol Ubolyam,Pairoj Chattranukulchai,Lalita Wattanachanya,Sarawut Siwamogsatham,Stephen J Kerr,Kristine M Erlandson,Anchalee Avihingsanon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03720-1
2022-12-31
Abstract:Background: Aging characteristics in people living with HIV (PLWH) are heterogeneous, and the identification of risk factors associated with aging-related comorbidities such as neurocognitive impairment (NCI) and frailty is important. We evaluated predictors of novel aging markers, phenotypic age (PhenoAge) and phenotypic age acceleration (PAA) and their association with comorbidities, frailty, and NCI. Methods: In a cohort of PLWH and age- and sex-matched HIV-negative controls, we calculated PhenoAge using chronological age and 9 biomarkers from complete blood counts, inflammatory, metabolic-, liver- and kidney-related parameters. PAA was calculated as the difference between chronological age and PhenoAge. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the factors associated with higher (>median) PAA. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was used to assess model discrimination for frailty. Results: Among 333 PLWH and 102 HIV-negative controls (38% female), the median phenotypic age (49.4 vs. 48.5 years, p = 0.54) and PAA (- 6.7 vs. -7.5, p = 0.24) was slightly higher and PAA slightly less in PLWH although this did not reach statistical significance. In multivariate analysis, male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 1.68 [95%CI = 1.03-2.73]), current smoking (2.74 [1.30-5.79]), diabetes mellitus (2.97 [1.48-5.99]), hypertension (1.67 [1.02-2.72]), frailty (3.82 [1.33-10.93]), and higher IL-6 levels (1.09 [1.04-1.15]), but not HIV status and NCI, were independently associated with higher PAA. PhenoAge marker discriminated frailty better than chronological age alone (AUROC: 0.75 [0.66-0.85] vs. 0.65 [0.55-0.77], p = 0.04). In the analysis restricted to PLWH, PhenoAge alone predicted frailty better than chronological age alone (AUROC: 0.7412 vs. 0.6499, P = 0.09) and VACS index (AUROC: 0.7412 vs. 0.6811, P = 0.34) despite not statistically significant. Conclusions: While PLWH did not appear to have accelerated aging in our cohort, the phenotypic aging marker was significantly associated with systemic inflammation, frailty, and cardiovascular disease risk factors. This simple aging marker could be useful to identify high-risk PLWH within a similar chronological age group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?