Abstract:The current investigation focuses on detailed analysis of the anchor-based optimization approach (ABOA), its comparison with alternative global fitting protocols and on the global analysis of the truncation of basis effects in the calculation of binding energies. It is shown that ABOA provides a solution which is close to that obtained in alternative approaches but at small portion of their computational time. The application of a softer correction function after few initial iterations of ABOA stabilizes and speeds up its convergence. The numerical errors in the calculation of binding energies related to the truncation of bosonic and fermionic bases have been globally investigated with respect of asymptotic values corresponding to the infinite basis in the framework of covariant density functional theory (CDFT). These errors typically grow with the increase of the mass and deformation of the nuclei. To reduce such errors in bosonic sector below 10 keV for almost all nuclei with proton number Z<120 one should truncate the bosonic basis at NB=28 instead of presently used NB=20 . The reduction of the errors in binding energies due to the truncation of the fermionic basis in CDFT is significantly more numerically costly. For the first time it is shown that the pattern and the speed of the convergence of binding energies as a function of the size of fermionic basis given by NF depend on the type of covariant energy density functional. The use of explicit density dependence of the meson-nucleon coupling constants or point couplings slows substantially the speed of convergence of binding energies as a function of NF . The present paper clearly indicates the need for accounting of infinite basis corrections for accurate calculation of binding energies and for fitting more precise next-generation covariant energy density functionals: note that such corrections are neglected in the present generation of the functionals. A procedure for finding the asymptotic values of binding energies is suggested in the present paper: it allows better control of numerical errors. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024321 ©2024 American Physical Society

Toward ab-initio nuclear theory calculations of

Towards $\it{ab}$-$\it{initio}$ nuclear theory calculations of $δ_\mathrm{C}$

Ab initio electroweak corrections to superallowed decays and their impact on

Ab-initio electroweak corrections to superallowed $β$ decays and their impact on $V_{ud}$

An $\textit{ab initio}$ strategy for taming nuclear-structure dependence of $ V_{ud} $ extractions: the $ {}^{10}\mathrm{C} \rightarrow {}^{10}\mathrm{B} $ superallowed transition

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional theory for nuclear structure

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional for nuclear structure

Reduced Hadronic Uncertainty in the Determination of V_ud

Data-driven reevaluation of values in superallowed decays

Higher-order isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections to nuclear matrix elements of Fermi decays

Dispersive Evaluation of the Inner Radiative Correction in Neutron and Nuclear Β Decay

Radiative corrections to superallowed $β$ decays in effective field theory

Toward accurate nuclear mass tables in covariant density functional theory

Lattice QCD Calculation of Electroweak Box Contributions to Superallowed Nuclear and Neutron Beta Decays

Isospin Corrections for Superallowed Fermi Beta Decay in Self-Consistent Relativistic Random Phase Approximation Approaches

Quark mass difference effects in hadronic Fermi matrix elements from first principles

Effect of Isospin Mixing on Superallowed Fermi Beta Decay in Self-Consistent Relativistic RPA Approaches

Isospin-breaking corrections to weak decays: the current status and a new infrared improvement

Data-driven reevaluation of $ft$-values in superallowed $β$ decays

Ab initio translationally invariant nucleon-nucleus optical potentials

Emulating ab initio computations of infinite nucleonic matter