Abstract:Background: Unilateral posterior crossbite is a common malocclusion, and early treatment is recommended to enable normal growth. There are several possibilities regarding choice of appliances used for correcting this malocclusion; however, when treatment is financed by public funds the decision needs to be based not only on the effects but also on the effect in relation to the costs. Objectives: The aim was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing quad helix (QH) and rapid maxillary expanders (RME; hyrax-type) in children in the early mixed dentition. Material and methods: Seventy-two patients were randomized to treatment with either QH or RME, at two different centres. Data were collected from the patient's medical records regarding success rate, number of visits, total treatment time, emergency visits, and so forth, together with answers from patient questionnaires concerning absence from school and use of analgesics. A cost-effectiveness analysis with both an intention-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol approach was performed, as well as a deterministic sensitivity analysis. Results: The success rate, one year after the completion of the expansion, was equal between groups according to the ITT approach. From a healthcare perspective, the mean cost difference between RME and QH was €32.05 in favour of QH (P = 0.583; NS). From a societal perspective, the mean cost difference was €32.61 in favour of QH (P = 0.742; NS). The total appliance cost alone was higher in the RME group €202.67 resp. €155.58 in the QH group (P = 0.001). The probability of RME having a higher cost was 71% from a healthcare perspective and 62.7% from a societal perspective. The total treatment time was 97 days longer in the QH group. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, when using a higher valuation of the children's educational loss, the QH becomes €58 more costly than the RME. There was a statistically significant difference in chair time and visits between centres (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The difference in costs between RME and QH is not statistically significant, however, there is a slightly higher probability that RME is more expensive than QH with a mean cost of an additional €32 per patient from a healthcare perspective. Different work procedures at different centres indicate that logistics around the patient's treatment is a more important aspect than appliance used to decrease the number of visits and save chair time and thereby also costs.

Early orthodontic treatment in a Finnish public health centre: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Evaluation and Comparative Assessment of Clear Aligners and Conventional Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Populations: a Cross-Sectional Study.

An epidemiological study on early orthodontic treatment need among eastern Saudi Arabian children in the mixed dentition stage

Investigation of Parents' Awareness of Early Orthodontic Evaluation and Treatment in Paediatric Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Is orthodontics prior to 11 years of age evidence-based? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Perceived Orthodontic Needs and Attitudes towards Early Evaluation and Interventions: A Survey-Based Study among Parents of Italian School-Aged Children

Costs and duration of orthodontic-surgical treatment with mandibular advancement surgery

Dental indices and their impact on targeting of dental prevention, periodontal and filling therapy in young adults undergoing subsidised public dental care

Class III malocclusions in deciduous or early mixed dentition: an early orthopaedic treatment

Assessment of quality of public oral health care on the basis of patient records

The knowledge of orthodontic and craniofacial growth amongst Italian Pediatric Medical Residents for early diagnosis in growing patients: a cross-sectional study

Self-Reported Changes in Oral Hygiene Habits among Adolescents Receiving Orthodontic Treatment

The Impact of Early Orthodontic Intervention on Dental and Skeletal Development in Children with Mixed Dentition

Survival of endodontically treated teeth in public dental service in Northern Finland: a practise-based register study

Knowledge and Attitude of General Dentists and Non-Orthodontic Specialists Towards Early Orthodontic Treatment – A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study

Orthodontists’ preferences in the use and timing of appliances for the correction of malocclusions in growing patients

Selection of criteria for assessment of occlusal acceptability

[Treatment of Class II malocclusion using Herbst appliance with headgear and rapid palatal expansion and straight wire appliance with implant anchorage]

Comparison of the Opinions of Adolescents With Different Orthodontic Treatment Needs

Digital treatment planning and clear aligner therapy: A retrospective cohort study