Abstract:In the Special issue on ‘‘Mind and Matter’’, the paper by Lindahl & A rhem (1994) presented an interesting and provocative discussion of ‘‘mind as a force field’’. This was based on the proposal by Karl Popper (Popper et al., 1993) that minds have important similarities to recognized physical forces. Popper hypothesized that ‘‘electro-magnetic wave fields (produced by neural activities) . . . represent the unconscious parts of our minds, and that the conscious mind—our conscious mental intensities, our conscious experiences—are capable of interacting with these unconscious physical force fields . . .’’. Lindahl & A rhem (1994) faced up to and fruitfully dealt with a number of philosophical issues raised by the proposition of a ‘‘mental force field’’. I had myself proposed the hypothetical existence of a ‘‘conscious mental field’’ (CMF; Libet 1993b, 1994). The CMF would emerge as a function of appropriate neural activities in the brain; it would have the attribute of conscious subjective experience; it could act back on certain neural activities and therefore affect the behavioral outcome, as in a willed action; it would account for the unity of subjective experience even though the latter emerges from the myriad of activities of billions of nerve cells and their synaptic and non-synaptic interplays. The CMF, like the subjective experiences constituted in it, would be accessible only to the individual having the experiences; it could not be directly observed by any external physical device except indirectly, by any effects it introduces on behavioral outcomes (just as conscious will is evidenced). I would like to analyse some aspects of Popper’s proposals, as elaborated by Lindahl & A rhem, and contrast them with my CMF proposal. I like Popper’s idea of viewing the mind as a kind of force field. My CMF could also be viewed in that way; such a CMF force would then have to be different from all known physical forces. Popper’s hypothesis does not appear to spell out any attributes of that conscious force field except its ability to interact with another entity, the brain’s electromagnetic field which belongs to his physical World 1. Popper’s view, that this electromagnetic field represents the unconscious aspects of mental function, is doubtful based on the evidence available. We have demonstrated (Libet et al., 1991) that the transition between an unconscious and a conscious mental operation can simply be a function of a longer duration of similar cerebral activations to achieve awareness. Furthermore, the ‘‘need for what we call attention’’ was similar in all our experimental trials, whether the mental event was an unconscious or a conscious one, so that the attention process does not necessarily distinguish between the two mental states. Electrophysiological activities and responses accompany both unconscious and conscious mental functions. However, these recordable activities must go on for a longer period of time in order for awareness to appear. In the case of sensory input from the skin, production of the slower late components of the evoked cerebral potentials (lasting 0.5 s or more) is necessary for the input to elicit a conscious sensory experience (Libet, 1973; Libet et al., 1967, 1975). Although stimulation of a single mechanoreceptor unit in the hand may elicit a sensation (Ochoa & Torebjörk, 1983), that single peripheral nerve impulse would have to lead to a 0.5 s cascade of early and late electrophysiological responses in the cerebral cortex to have produced a sensory experience. In short, it would appear that both unconscious and conscious mental events could be correlated with or represented by electromagnetic fields of brain activity. Popper’s distinction between conscious and unconscious functions by representing the unconscious ones with a physical electromagnetic field seems to be meaningless. Popper’s proposal of a conscious mental force field arising as a distinctive entity (his World 2) of the physical brain (World 1) is a more supportable one. Indeed, that proposal can be considered similar to my proposed CMF. However, there is no reason to regard such a field as one which is not correlated to specific electromagnetic manifestations of neural

[Dealing with patient dissatisfaction; a professional skill].

MD001, a Novel Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor α/γ Agonist, Improves Glucose and Lipid Metabolism

Emodin exhibits anti-acne potential by inhibiting cell growth, lipogenesis, and inflammation in human SZ95 sebocytes

Paeoniflorin mitigates insulin-like growth factor 1-induced lipogenesis and inflammation in human sebocytes by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/FoxO1 and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways

Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili

Anti‐acne vulgaris effects of chlorogenic acid by anti‐inflammatory activity and lipogenesis inhibition

Integrated Proteomics and Metabolomics Link Acne to the Action Mechanisms of Cryptotanshinone Intervention

Conscious mind as a field.

Azidothymidine Downregulates Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Induced Lipogenesis by Suppressing Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Mitophagy in Immortalized Human Sebocytes

The Effects of New Selective PPARα Agonist CP775146 on Systematic Lipid Metabolism in Obese Mice and Its Potential Mechanism.

A novel deformable liposomal hydrogel loaded with a SREBP-1-inhibiting polypeptide for reducing sebum synthesis in golden hamster model

Babinski and Babinski sign.

Decoy oligodeoxynucleotides: A promising therapeutic strategy for inflammatory skin disorders

Surfactin-oleogel with therapeutic potential for inflammatory acne vulgaris induced by Propionibacterium acnes

Study on the anti-inflammatory and lipid-lowering activities of novel chimeric peptide

Hyaluronic acid-FGF2-derived peptide bioconjugates for suppression of FGFR2 and AR simultaneously as an acne antagonist

Ultraviolet spectrophotometric determination of chlorprothixene in biologic specimens.

Rhizoma Paridis saponins attenuate Gram‐negative bacteria‐induced inflammatory acne by binding to KEAP1 and modulating Nrf2 and MAPK pathways

[Evaluation of fifteen months' activity in an ambulatory surgery center in a university hospital].

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Δ Induces Insulin-Induced Gene-1 and Suppresses Hepatic Lipogenesis in Obese Diabetic Mice

Inhibitory effects of superoxide dismutase 3 on Propionibacterium acnes-induced skin inflammation