Upfront versus Delayed Systemic Therapy in Patients with Oligometastatic Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy on the Phase II SABR-5 Trial
S Baker,Lechner L,M Liu,J Chang,E Cruz-Lim,B Mou,W Jiang,A Bergman,D Schellenberg,A Alexander,T Berrang,A Bang,N Chng,Q Matthews,H Carolan,F Hsu,S Miller,S Atrchian,E Chan,C Ho,I Mohamed,A Lin,V Huang,A Mestrovic,D Hyde,C Lund,H Pai,B Valev,S Lefresne,G Arbour,I Yu,S Tyldesley,RA Olson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.008
IF: 8.013
2024-01-14
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Abstract:Purpose The optimal sequencing of local and systemic therapy for oligometastatic cancer has not been established. This study retrospectively compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and SABR-related toxicity between upfront versus delay of systemic treatment until progression in patients on the XXXX trial. Methods and materials The single arm phase II XXXX trial accrued patients with up to 5 oligometastases across XXXX between November 2016-July 2020. Patients received SABR to all lesions. Two cohorts were retrospectively identified, those receiving upfront systemic treatment along with SABR and those for whom systemic treatment was delayed until disease progression. Patients treated for oligoprogression were excluded. Propensity score analysis with overlap weighting balanced baseline characteristics of cohorts. Bootstrap sampling and Cox regression models estimated the association of delayed systemic treatment with PFS, OS and grade ≥ 2 toxicity. Results A total of 319 patients with oligometastases underwent treatment on XXXX, including 121 (38%) who received upfront and 198 (62%) delayed systemic treatment. In the weighted sample, prostate cancer was the most common primary tumor histology (48%) followed by colorectal (18%), breast (13%) and lung (4%). Most patients (93%) were treated for 1-2 metastases. Median follow-up time was 34 months (IQR 24 – 45). Delayed systemic treatment was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–2.13; P=0.005) but similar OS (HR=0.90, 95% CI 0.51–1.59; P=0.65) compared to upfront systemic treatment. Risk of grade 2 or higher SABR-related toxicity was reduced with delayed systemic treatment (odds ratio=0.35, 95% CI 0.15–0.70; P<0.001). Conclusions Delayed systemic treatment is associated with shorter PFS without reduction in OS and with reduced SABR-related toxicity, and may be a favorable option for select patients seeking to avoid initial systemic treatment. Efforts should continue to accrue patients to histology-specific trials examining a delayed systemic treatment approach.
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging