Stimulation-Evoked Effective Connectivity (SEEC): An in-vivo approach for defining mesoscale corticocortical connectivity

David T Bundy,Scott Barbay,Heather M Hudson,Shawn B Frost,Randolph J Nudo,David J Guggenmos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109767
2023-01-15
Abstract:Background: Cortical electrical stimulation is a versatile technique for examining the structure and function of cortical regions and for implementing novel therapies. While electrical stimulation has been used to examine the local spread of neural activity, it may also enable longitudinal examination of mesoscale interregional connectivity. New method: Here, we sought to use intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in conjunction with recordings of multi-unit action potentials to assess the mesoscale effective connectivity within sensorimotor cortex. Neural recordings were made from multielectrode arrays placed into sensory, motor, and premotor regions during surgical experiments in three squirrel monkeys. During each recording, single-pulse ICMS was repeatably delivered to a single region. Mesoscale effective connectivity was calculated from ICMS-evoked changes in multi-unit firing. Results: Multi-unit action potentials were able to be detected on the order of 1 ms after each ICMS pulse. Across sensorimotor regions, short-latency (< 2.5 ms) ICMS-evoked neural activity strongly correlated with known anatomical connections. Additionally, ICMS-evoked responses remained stable across the experimental period, despite small changes in electrode locations and anesthetic state. Comparison with existing methods: Previous imaging studies investigating cross-regional responses to stimulation are limited to utilizing indirect hemodynamic responses and thus lack the temporal specificity of ICMS-evoked responses. Conclusions: These results show that monitoring ICMS-evoked neural activity, in a technique we refer to as Stimulation-Evoked Effective Connectivity (SEEC), is a viable way to longitudinally assess effective connectivity, enabling studies comparing the time course of connectivity changes with the time course of changes in behavioral function.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?