A prospective study comparing itraconazole alone versus systemic steroids alone as adjuncts to topical steroids in the post-operative management of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

Amala Salil,Nedha Joy,Bini Faizal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14014
Abstract:Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of itraconazole and systemic steroids as an adjuvant to topical steroids in post-operative patients with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) using both subjective and objective outcome measurements. Design: A prospective comparative study. Setting: A tertiary care centre. Participants: Sixty patients diagnosed with AFRS were included. Patients with chronic systemic illness and those undergoing revision surgery were excluded. Post-operative patients were divided into two groups of 30 each which received itraconazole 400 mg OD or methylprednisolone in tapering doses over 6 weeks. Main outcome measures: The outcomes were measured at the end of 6 weeks-Kupferberg endoscopic staging, absolute eosinophilic count (AEC), serum immunoglobulin (IgE), and Sino Nasal Outcome Test-20 scores. Results: Our study showed no statistical significance in outcomes between the two groups treated with itraconazole and methylprednisolone regarding recurrence, AEC, IgE and quality of life assessment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Itraconazole was comparable to methylprednisolone in preventing disease recurrence in the post-operative management of AFRS. It may be a viable alternative to replacing systemic steroids where the latter may be contraindicated. Itraconazole given at a dose of 400 mg once daily for 6 weeks was a safe dose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?