Lived experience of older adults with type 1 diabetes using closed-loop automated insulin delivery in a randomised trial

Erin Kubilay,Steven Trawley,Glenn M Ward,Spiros Fourlanos,Charlotte A Grills,Melissa H Lee,Richard J MacIsaac,David N O'Neal,Niamh A O'Regan,Vijaya Sundararajan,Sara Vogrin,Peter G Colman,Sybil A McAuley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15020
Abstract:Aim: To explore the lived experience of older adults with type 1 diabetes using closed-loop automated insulin delivery, an area previously receiving minimal attention. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults aged 60 years or older with long-duration type 1 diabetes who participated in a randomised, open-label, two-stage crossover trial comparing first-generation closed-loop therapy (MiniMed 670G) versus sensor-augmented pump therapy. Interview recordings were transcribed, thematically analysed and assessed. Results: Twenty-one older adults participated in interviews after using closed-loop therapy. Twenty were functionally independent, without frailty or major cognitive impairment; one was dependent on caregiver assistance, including for diabetes management. Quality of life benefits were identified, including improved sleep and reduced diabetes-related psychological burden, in the context of experiencing improved glucose levels. Gaps between expectations and reality of closed-loop therapy were also experienced, encountering disappointment amongst some participants. The cost was perceived as a barrier to continued closed-loop access post-trial. Usability issues were identified, such as disruptive overnight alarms and sensor inaccuracy. Conclusions: The lived experience of older adults without frailty or major cognitive impairment using first-generation closed-loop therapy was mainly positive and concordant with glycaemic benefits found in the trial. Older adults' lived experience using automated insulin delivery beyond trial environments requires exploration; moreover, the usability needs of older adults should be considered during future device development.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?