Causal Relationship of Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Bone Mineral Density and the Role of BMI
Fei Xu,XiuRong Zhang,YinRong Zhang,WenHui Chen,ZiCong Liao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/nss.s443557
2024-03-23
Nature and Science of Sleep
Abstract:Fei Xu, 1 XiuRong Zhang, 2 YinRong Zhang, 1 WenHui Chen, 3 ZiCong Liao 1 1 General Surgery Department, Zhongshan Boai Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, People's Republic of China; 2 Breast Surgery Department, Zhongshan Boai Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China Correspondence: ZiCong Liao, General Surgery Department, Zhongshan Boai Hospital affiliated to Southern Medical University, No. 6 Chenggui Road, East Street, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 76088776658, Email WenHui Chen, Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 13129349492, Fax +86 20 38688608, Email Background: Observational studies have yielded conflicting evidence concerning the relationships between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and bone mineral density (BMD). As the exact causal inferences remain inconclusive, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to identify the causal associations between OSA and BMD. Methods: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with OSA were extracted from the FinnGen study. Summary statistics for 10 BMD measured at different age or skeletal sites were obtained from the publicly available IEU GWAS database. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was chosen as the primary analysis, combined with several sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of results. The study design included two-sample MR and network MR. Results: Our primary MR analysis revealed that genetically predicted OSA was positively linked to increased forearm BMD (β = 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06– 0.41, p = 0.009) and heel BMD (β=0.10, 95% CI = 0.02– 0.18, p = 0.018), while no significant causal relationships were observed between OSA and total body BMD, lumbar spine BMD, or femoral neck BMD (all p > 0.05). Network MR suggests that OSA might act as a mediating factor in the effect of BMI on forearm BMD and heel BMD, with a mediated portion estimated at 73% and 84%, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings provide support for a causal relationship between genetically predicted OSA and increased forearm BMD and heel BMD. Furthermore, our results suggest that OSA may play a role in mediating the influence of BMI on BMD. Keywords: obstructive sleep apnea, bone mineral density, BMI, Mendelian randomization Obstructive sleep apnea is a prevalent sleep-related breathing disease characterized by sleep fragmentation, recurrent apnea, and intermittent hypoxia (IH), affecting nearly 1 billion individuals worldwide. 1,2 OSA-induced IH leads to oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and elevated sympathetic activation, all of which contribute to the development of various diseases, such as metabolic disorders, cardiocerebrovascular diseases, and neurological dysfunction. 3,4 Additionally, as a hallmark of OSA, IH also impacts bone metabolism via regulating the activity of mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts, ultimately resulting in a change in bone mineral density (BMD). 5 Osteoporosis is a common chronic systemic skeletal disorder characterized by skeletal fragility and microarchitectural deterioration. 6 The measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis. 7 The associations between OSA and BMD has been investigated by many observational cohort studies, but the results remain controversial. For example, a recent meta-analysis from 15 studies consisting of 113,082 patients demonstrated that a strong association between OSA and an increased risk of osteoporosis, along with decreased lumbar spine BMD; 8 In contrast, an earlier meta-analysis including 7 studies with 113,558 subjects showed OSA increased the risk of osteoporosis in cohort studies but decreased the risk in cross-sectional studies. 9 Additionally, a meta-analysis from 9 articles involving 113,137 participants revealed that OSA was not associated with the risk of osteoporosis. 10 The discrepancy in these conflicting findings may be attributed to failure to sufficiently adjust for potential confounding variables. Accumulating evidence suggests that OSA is associated with osteoporosis and BMD, but the exact causality between OSA and BMD remains unclear. Furthermore, findings from conventional observational studies are suscepti -Abstract Truncated-
neurosciences,clinical neurology