Comparative frequency of x-ray induced crossover-suppressing aberrations recovered from oocytes and sperm of Drosophila melanogaster.

R. Thomas,P. Roberts
IF: 4.402
1966-05-01
Genetics
Abstract:incidence of dominant lethality is of the same order of magnitude in T z c y t e s as in sperm of Drosophila melanogaster given the same radiation exposure ( SONNENBLICK 1940; BATEMAN and CHANDLEY 1963). However, when oocytes of females bearing free X chromosomes are irradiated, the frequency of X-ray induced translocations is only 1/100 of that recovered from sperm given the same X-ray exposure (KANELLIS and RADU 1943). This is puzzling since dominant lethality is usually attributed to gross chromosomal rearrangements. PATTERSON and MULLER (1930) suggested that spatial relations between chromosomes (tightly packed together in the sperm head, loosely dispersed in other cells) might alter the relative proportion of exchanges and restitution. CATCHESIDE (1938) provided some evidence that spatial relations among chromosome arms affect aberration yield: among aberrations detected in F, larvae of irradiated D. melunogaster males, he found a higher proportion of rearrangements involving only one chromosome arm (paracentric inversions) than would be expected from random breakage and reunion. In a study designed to investigate the contribution of spatial relations of chromosomes to the difference in frequency of translocations recovered from sperm and oocytes, GLASS (1955a) attempted to determine whether the frequency of one type of X-ray induced intrachromosomal aberration, inversions, recovered from oocytes approaches the frequency recovered from sperm. He reported the recovery of a considerably higher frequency of inversions (detected by means of crossover suppression) from oocytes than translocations, a finding which he interpreted as support for the suggestion of PATTERSON and MULLER (1930). However, it has recently been shown that in a large proportion of translocations with distal breakpoints, the frequency of recombination is low, comparable to that of inversion heterozygotes (ROBERTS 1965). Since there had been no cytological studies of suspected inversions in GLASS’S experiments, we felt that a reexamination of the relative frequency of interand intrachromosomal aberrations recovered from irradiated oocytes and sperm was needed. In the present study we examined oocytes for X-ray induced crossover-suppressing aberrations, using a screening technique and radiation exposure which
What problem does this paper attempt to address?