Abstract:Despite its relevance, measuring the contributions of the bioeconomy to national economies remains an arduous task that faces limitations. Part of the difficulty is associated with the lack of a clear and widely accepted concept of the bioeconomy and moves on to the connections between methods, data and indicators. The present study aims to define the concepts of bioeconomy and to explore the connections between concepts, methods, data, and indicators when measuring the bioeconomy economically and the limitations involved in this process. The bioeconomy concepts were defined based on a literature review and a content analysis of 84 documents selected through snowballing procedures to find articles measuring "how big is the bioeconomy?" The content of the 84 documents was uploaded to the Quantitative Data Analysis (QDA Miner) software and coded according to the bioeconomy concept, the methods or models used, the data sources accessed, the indicators calculated, and the limitations reported by the authors. The results of the occurrence and co-occurrence of the codes were extracted and analyzed statistically, indicating the following: the measurement of the bioeconomy (i) needs to recognize and pursue the proposed concept of a holistic bioeconomy; (ii) rarely considered aspects of a holistic bioeconomy (3.5%); (iii) is primarily based on the concept of biomass-based bioeconomy (BmBB) (94%); (iv) the association with the concept of biosphere (BsBB) appeared in 26% of the studies; (v) the biotech-based bioeconomy (BtBB) was the least frequent (1.2%); (vi) there is a diversity of methods and models, but the most common are those traditionally used to measure macroeconomic activities, especially input-output models; (vii) depending on the prevailing methods, the data comes from various official statistical databases, such as national accounts and economic activity classification systems; (viii) the most frequently used indicators are value added, employment, and Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions; (ix) there are various limitations related to the concept, methods and models, data, indicators, and others, like incomplete, missing, or lack of data, aggregated data, outdated data or databases, uncertainty of the estimated values, the subjectivity in the bio-shares weighting procedures, and other limitations inherent to methods and models. We conclude that current efforts only partially measure the contributions of the bioeconomy, and efforts should be encouraged toward a full assessment, starting by recognizing that the measurement of a holistic bioeconomy should be pursued.

A Comparative Analysis of Bioeconomy Development in European Union Countries

Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis

Assessment of EU Bio-Based Economy Sectors Based on Environmental, Socioeconomic, and Technical Indicators

Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence

Perception and awareness of the bioeconomy: an empirical study of chosen European academia

Institutional quality and bioeconomy performance in European countries: Unveiling the evidence

Sustainability Implications of the EU's Bioeconomy Transition along Global Supply Chains

Assessing the Sustainability of Agricultural Bioenergy Potential in the European Union

The Green Economy in the Energy Transformation Process—Comparative Analysis of the European Union Member States

Costs and Profitability of Crops for Bioeconomy in the EU

The Circular Economy Practices in the European Union: Eco-Innovation and Sustainable Development

EMPLOYMENT AND ADDED VALUE IN EUROPEN UNION BIOECONOMY – A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE

Modern Bioeconomy Measurement in the Green Economy Paradigm: Four Pillars of Alternative Bioeconomy

Knowledge Economy Indicators and Their Impact on the Sustainable Competitiveness of the EU Countries

Efficiency of Wood-Processing Enterprises—Evaluation Based on DEA and MPI: A Comparison between Slovakia and Bulgaria for the Period 2014–2018

Application of TIMES for Bioresource Flow Optimization—Case Study of Animal Husbandry in Latvia, Europe

Bioeconomy as an innovative approach to rural development in the context of Common Agricultural Policy in EU

Knowledge Mapping of bioeconomy: A bibliometric analysis

Developing a Sustainable and Circular Bio-Based Economy in EU: By Partnering Across Sectors, Upscaling and Using New Knowledge Faster, and For the Benefit of Climate, Environment & Biodiversity, and People & Business

Measuring the Bioeconomy Economically: Exploring the Connections between Concepts, Methods, Data, Indicators and Their Limitations