Gender and Sexual License : The Plot Might Change but the Message Remains the Same ( A Response to

W. Nelson,M. Fineman

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

[A Rational Analysis of the Commonly Used Renal Tumor Scoring Systems in Predicting Surgical Outcomes of Cystic Renal Masses].

W Chen,Y L Wang,K Cheng,B H Chen,P Zhang,Q X Fang,D P Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230508-00743

2023-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To explore the predictive effect of the renal tumor scoring system on the surgical outcomes of cystic renal masses (CRM). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 234 patients who received robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2018 to June 2020. And 31 cases had CRM and 203 cases had solid renal masses (SRM). The propensity score of patients was calculated by logistic regression model, and 1∶2 matching was performed by the nearest neighbor method. The changes in perioperative indexes and long-term estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in CRM group and SRM group were compared. The CRM group and SRM group were stratified according to the complexity grading of R.E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score, respectively, to compare the difference in the achievement rate of ideal surgical outcome between the two groups, and analyze the predictive factors affected. The CRM diameter was stratified with 4 cm as the cut-off value (CRM1 group with a diameter<4 cm, CRM2 group with a diameter≥4 cm), and the surgical results were compared with the matched SRM1 group and SRM2 group. Results: In the matching cohort, the CRM group comprised 29 patients with a mean age of (48.7±10.8) years, of which 22 (75.9%) were males. The SRM group included 58 patients with a mean age of (50.4±10.2) years, of which 41 (70.7%) were males, with no statistically significant difference (all P>0.05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) [M (Q1,Q3)] in the CRM group was longer than that in the SRM group [23(18, 25) vs 19(17, 25) min, P=0.040]. The operation time (OT) [M (Q1,Q3)] in the CRM group was also longer than that of the SRM group [130(100, 150) vs 108(86, 120) min, P=0.006]. The change in serum creatinine before and after the operation [M (Q1,Q3)] was higher in the CRM group than in the SRM group [15(10, 23) vs 12(6, 17) μmol/L, P=0.030]. The ideal surgical outcomes were achieved in 7 patients (24.1%) in the CRM group and 36 patients (62.1%) in the SRM group. The number of patients achieving ideal surgical outcomes in R.E.N.A.L. intermediate complex surgery and PADUA advanced complex surgery in the SRM group were 24 (58.5%) and 15 (51.7%), respectively, which were higher than those in the CRM group 6 (27.3%) and 1 (5.9%) respectively (P<0.05). Preoperative eGFR (OR=0.758, 95%CI: 0.719-0.799) and the nature of the tumor (CRM as reference, OR=4.883, 95%CI: 1.550-15.378) were influencing factors for achieving the ideal surgical outcome. Subgroup analysis showed that eGFR changes before and after surgery and the estimated blood loss (EBL) in the CRM2 group were higher than those in the SRM2 group, and WIT and OT were longer than those in the SRM2 group (all P<0.05). The EBL and WIT of the CRM1 group were shorter than those of the CRM2 group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The surgical risk of RAPN in complex CRMs with a maximum diameter of≥4 cm is higher than the risk of RAPN in SRM with equivalent R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scores.
A Novel Nephrometry Scoring System for Predicting Peri-Operative Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Bin Yang,Lu-Lin Ma,Min Qiu,Hai-Zhui Xia,Wei He,Tian-Yu Meng,Min Lu,Jian Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000668

2020-01-01

Abstract:Background::Although the impact of tumor complexity on peri-operative outcomes has been well established using several nephrometry scoring systems, the impact of adherent perirenal fat remains poorly defined. This study aimed to develop a novel nephrometry scoring system for predicting the peri-operative outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) by integrating and optimizing the RENAL score (RNS) and Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score.Methods::We retrospectively evaluated 159 patients treated with retroperitoneal LPN. The patients’ demographic parameters, RNSs, and MAP scores were evaluated as potential predictors of perioperative outcomes, including operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin, ischemia, and complication (MIC) achievement rate. The independent predictors were used to develop a novel nephrometry scoring system. The predictive value and inter-observer agreement for the novel nephrometry scoring system were evaluated.Results::Tumor radius (R score), nearness to the renal sinus or collecting system (N score), and posterior perinephric fat thickness were independent predictors of peri-operative outcomes and were used to develop the RNP score. The univariate analysis revealed that the RNP score was significantly associated with operation time, EBL, and MIC achievement rate ( P < 0.050). The RNP score was an independent predictor of operation time ( P < 0.001), EBL ( P = 0.018), and MIC achievement rate ( P = 0.023) in the multivariate analysis. The RNP score was not inferior to RNS in the area under the curve for predicting peri-operative outcomes and performed better in inter-observer agreement (76.7% vs. 57.8%) and kappa value (0.804 vs. 0.726). Conclusion::The RNP score, combining the advantages of the RNS and MAP score, demonstrated a good predictive value for the peri-operative outcomes of retroperitoneal LPN and better inter-observer agreement.
Clinical Analysis Of The Padua And The Renal Scoring Systems For Renal Neoplasms: A Retrospective Study Of 245 Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Zhong-Yuan Zhang,Qi Tang,Xue-Song Li,Qian Zhang,Wesley A Mayer,Jing-Yun Wu,Xue-Dong Yang,Xiao-Chun Zhang,Xiao-Ying Wang,Li-Qun Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12192

2014-01-01

International Journal of Urology

Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic (PADUA) and radius exophytic/endophytic nearness anterior/posterior location (RENAL) scoring systems for renal neoplasms in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was carried out on clinical data of 245 Chinese patients with renal neoplasms undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from June 2008 to June 2012. The perioperative complications and variables, as well as PADUA and RENAL score, were compared.ResultsThe PADUA and RENAL scoring systems were significantly associated with percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (P=0.032 and P=0.026 respectively), whereas the RENAL scoring system was also significantly associated with warm ischemia time (P=0.032). On multivariate analysis, both scores were able to predict percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (PADUA, P=0.011; RENAL, P=0.028). There were no significant associations between the two scoring systems assessed and the occurrence of complications or tumor stage. The correlation between PADUA classification and RENAL nephrometry score was significant (P<0.0001). Fleiss' generalized kappa was 0.69-0.89 for the various components of the PADUA score and 0.67-0.89 for the RENAL nephrometry components.ConclusionsThe PADUA classification and RENAL nephrometry score are comprehensive assessment tools for delineating renal tumor anatomy. The reproducibility of the PADUA and RENAL scores is substantial, but further research is required to evaluate its performance in more accurately predicting operative and patient-related outcomes.
AB162. A novel “SSS+f” nephrometry score system to evaluate the technical complexity of nephron-sparing surgery

Shudong Zhang,Lin Ma,Lei Liu,Yu Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.s162

2016-04-01

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:For the complex and technical nature of tumor exposure, tumor resection, and renal reconstruction involved in partial nephrectomy, a detailed understanding of renal tumor anatomy is necessary for comprehensive preoperative surgical protocols. We have developed a novel nephrometry scoring system (3S+f nephrometry score) to quantify the anatomical characteristics of renal masses on computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. We aimed to propose this simple scoring system to evaluate the technical complexity of partial nephrectomy. We retrospectively evaluated 100 patients with contrast-enhanced CT imaging who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy consecutively between January 2014 and October 2015. The “SSS+f” nephrometry score is based on four critical and reproducible anatomical features of solid renal masses. Of the four components three are scored on a 1, 2 or 3-point scale with the 4th indicating the quantity and quality of the perinephric fat which put great influence on the technical difficulty is scored on 0 or 1-point scale. The “SSS+f” nephrometry score consists of SIZE (tumor size as intrarenal maximal diameter), SITE (tumor location including lateral/lower pole, medial/upper pole, hilar/endophytic), SIDE (distance of tumor deepest side to the collecting system or sinus or the main renal artery or vein). Moreover, perinephric fat (f) which is sticky or thick is assigned to tumors that evaluate technical difficulty of mobilize the kidney and isolate the renal tumor. The “SSS+f” nephrometry scoring system accurately classified the complexity of 100 consecutive tumors undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy at our institution by single surgeon. Tumor complexity according to nephrometry score was assessed as low in 18 (18%), moderate in 48 (48%) and high-complexity group in 34 (34%). There were no significant differences with respect to EBL, transfusion rate, or postoperative complications among the three groups. Postoperative renal functional outcomes were similar among the three groups. Only mean operative time was significantly different with different group. The median warm ischemic time (WIT) was also significantly different in the low- versus high-complexity group but was similar between the moderate- and high-complexity groups. Standardized reporting of renal tumor size, site and side is essential for decision making and effective comparisons in nephron-sparing surgery. The “SSS+f” nephrometry score is a reproducible and simple classification system that quantitates the anatomic features of renal masses. This novel approach provides a simple and easy tool for meaningful comparisons of renal masses in clinical practice.

urology & nephrology,andrology
Comparing technology-based scoring systems for retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy

Xing, Nianzeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-024-05620-3

2024-05-15

Microsystem Technologies

Abstract:Nephrometry scores play a critical role in the preoperative evaluation of partial nephrectomy. Although score comparisons have been performed for transperitoneal or open surgery, systematic comparisons for retroperitoneal operations are lacking. Authors have retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at one center by one surgeon. Scores were generated according to the imaging results, and each score was categorized into low-, intermediate- and high-complexity groups. Then, the differences in perioperative outcomes were compared among the groups. We assessed whether the scores and sex, body mass index (BMI), age, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification could predict whether the warm ischemia time (WIT) was likely be longer than 20 min and whether they could predict postoperative complications worse than Clavien–Dindo 1. The interobserver variability between two experienced surgeons for these scores was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Total of 107 patients were ultimately evaluated. The scores included in this study were significantly associated with the probability of having a WIT > 20 min and high-grade postoperative complications. Receiver Characteristic Operator (ROC) curves showed that there were no significant differences in their predictive power. NePhRo had the highest agreement (0.839), followed by DAP (0.827). RENAL was superior to SPARE and PADUA, which were 0.758, 0.724 and 0.667, respectively.

engineering, electrical & electronic,materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology,physics, applied
A “3s+f” Nephrometry Score System to Predict the Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery

Shudong Zhang,Zijian Qin,Hai Bi,Liyuan Tao,Fan Zhang,Hongxian Zhang,Wei Wang,Jitao Wu,Yi Huang,Lulin Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.922082

IF: 4.7

2022-01-01

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:BackgroundWhen we treat renal cell carcinoma by laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), it is essential to use an evaluation system to predict clinical outcomes. Hitherto, there are more than a dozen nephrometry score systems. In this study, through assessing the correlations between nephrometry score systems and clinical outcomes, we aim to provide a novel nephrometry score system—the “3S+f” score system—to simplify the evaluation of technical complexity of partial nephrectomy.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 131 patients who underwent NSS, which was performed by a single surgeon (SZ) from January 2013 to July 2018 at Peking University Third Hospital. The “3S+f” score system contains four parameters: “size, side, site, and fat”, all of which can be obtained from preoperative imaging data. We evaluated the correlations between the “3S+f” score and clinical outcomes, and compared R.E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score.ResultsAll the three nephrometry score systems were related to some clinical outcomes in univariate analyses. In multivariate regression models, the “3S+f” score, the R.E.N.A.L. score, and the PADUA score were significantly associated with operative time (p = 0.016, p = 0.035, and p = 0.001, respectively) and warm ischemia time (all p = 0.008, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). “3S+f” was also significantly related to extubation time > 5 days (p = 0.018). In predicting operative time > 120 min and extubation time >5 days from ROC curves, the AUCs of the “3S+f” score (0.717 and 0.652, respectively) were larger than both the R.E.N.A.L (0.598 and 0.554, respectively) and PADUA (0.600 and 0.542, respectively) score systems.ConclusionA novel nephrometry score system—the “3S+f” score system—shows equivalent correlation and the ability in predicting clinical outcomes when compared to the R.E.N.A.L. score system and the PADUA score system, which can describe renal tumors.
The role of RENAL, PADUA, C-index, CSA nephrometry systems in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy

Yu-De Wang,Chi-Ping Huang,Chao-Hsiang Chang,Hsi-Chin Wu,Che-Rei Yang,Yu-Ping Wang,Po-Fan Hsieh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0504-2

2019-08-05

Abstract:Background: Functional outcome is an important issue in nephron-sparing surgery. Various nephrometries have been developed to predict renal function preservation. The aim of this study was to examine the applicability of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, C-index, and mathematical tumor contact surface area (CSA) in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy using radio-isotope scans. Methods: We performed this retrospective study in patients who underwent partial nephrectomy between May 2013 and April 2017, and used abdominopelvic computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to obtain R.E.N.A.L., C-index, and CSA. Renal function was measured by 99mTc mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3). We evaluated correlations between nephrometries and perioperative parameters, and comparatively analyzed different nephrometries to determine the predictive ability in the percent change of effective renal plasma flow of the affected kidney. Results: Three, two, and 35 patients received partial nephrectomy in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches, respectively. The median (IQR) tumor size was 3.13 (2.4) cm. The median (IQR) R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, C-index, and CSA scores were 7 (3), 8 (2), 2.01 (1.87), and 14.14 (19.25) cm2, respectively. Spearman correlation analysis showed that four nephrometries were correlated with each other. The strongest correlations were between CSA and C-index (coefficient: - 0.885, p < 0.001), followed by R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA (coefficient: 0.778, p < 0.001). Ischemia time was significantly correlated with R.EN.A.L. (coefficient: 0.35, p = 0.025), PADUA (coefficient: 0.42, p = 0.007), C-index (coefficient: - 0.45, p = 0.004), and CSA (coefficient: 0.41, p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, PADUA significantly affected ischemia time (p = 0.04). The percent change in effective renal plasma flow (PCE) of the operated kidney was correlated with PADUA (coefficient: 0.48 p = 0.002), C-index (coefficient: - 0.74, p < 0.001), and CSA (coefficient: 0.75, p < 0.001). Only CSA and C-index independently affected PCE (both p < 0.05) in multivariate analysis. In ROC curve analysis, both C-index and CSA could predict 20% change in effective renal plasma flow (AUC: 0.91 vs 0.86, p = 0.2) of the affected kidney. Conclusions: We suggest using PADUA to evaluate surgical complexity and ischemia time. Regarding the accuracy of the prediction of post-operative ipsilateral renal function, both CSA and C-index outperformed R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA nephrometries.
Comparison of the RENAL, PADUA, DAP, NePhRO, and SPARE scores for retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Yanyang Jin,Mingshuai Wang,Feiya Yang,Nianzeng Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-45284/v1

2020-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Background: Nephrometry scores play a critical role in the preoperative evaluation of partial nephrectomy. Although score comparisons have been performed for transperitoneal or open surgery, systematic comparisons for retroperitoneal operations are lacking.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at one center by one surgeon. Scores were generated according to the imaging results, and each score was categorized into low-, intermediate- and high-complexity groups. Then, the differences in perioperative outcomes were compared among the groups. We assessed whether the scores and sex, body mass index (BMI), age, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification could predict whether the warm ischemia time (WIT) was likely be longer than 20 min and whether they could predict postoperative complications worse than Clavien–Dindo 1. The interobserver variability between two experienced surgeons for these scores was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Results: A total of 107 patients were ultimately evaluated. The median tumor size was 36.88 mm, and the median WIT, total operation time (OT) and estimated blood loss (EBL) were 18.97 min, 80 min, and 100 ml, respectively. Significant differences in WIT were identified among the complexity groups for each scoring system. Significant differences were identified between the OTs associated with the DAP and RENAL score complexity groups. The scores included in this study were significantly associated with the probability of having a WIT >20 min and high-grade postoperative complications. Receiver Characteristic Operator (ROC) curves showed that there were no significant differences in their predictive power. NePhRo had the highest agreement (0.839), followed by DAP (0.827). RENAL was superior to SPARE and PADUA, which were 0.758, 0.724 and 0.667, respectively.Conclusions: The scores included in this study were useful for preoperative assessment of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. No significant differences were observed among the scores in terms of their ability to predict prolonged hot ischemia time or high-grade postoperative complications. DAP is a good score in the retroperitoneal circumstance when its consistency is taken into account.
The effect of a low dosage of testosterone on the I.C.S.H.- and F.S.H.-contents of intact and gonadectomized male and female rats; with additional data on body weight and various organ weights.

F. J. Paesi,S. de Jongh,S. Croesbuth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/ACTA.0.0300259

1959-02-01

Acta Endocrinologica

Abstract:
[Clinical Analysis of the Application of R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score for the Nephron Sparing Surgery].

Zhong-yuan Zhang,Qi Tang,Xue-song Li,Jing-yun Wu,Xue-dong Yang,Xiao-chun Zhang,Xiao-ying Wang,Li-qun Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-167x.2012.04.010

2012-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical significance of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for renal neoplasms in patients undergoing nephron sparing surgery.METHODS:A retrospective analysis was conducted of clinical data of 110 patients with renal neoplasms undergoing nephron sparing surgery, who were admitted to Peking University First Hospital from January 2010 to January 2012. The operation approaches, perioperative variables and perioperative complications as well as R.E.N.A.L. scores were compared.RESULTS:The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was significantly associated with the operation approach (P<0.001), while there was no significant association between the scoring system and the occurrence of complications (P<0.611). Meanwhile, it was associated with ischemia time (P<0.023) and percentage change in the creatinine level (P<0.025). Low complexity tumors had significantly shorter ischemia time and low percentage change in the creatinine level than high complexity tumors (P<0.008, P<0.010). Fleiss' generalized kappa was 0.52 to 0.89 for the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry components.CONCLUSION:The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score is a comprehensive assessment tool for delineating renal tumor anatomy. The reproducibility of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores is substantial, but further research is required to evaluate its performance in predicting operative outcomes more accurately.
The Comparison of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and Centrality Index Score in Predicting Perioperative Outcomes and Complications after Laparoscopic Radio Frequency Ablation of Renal Tumors

Xiaofeng Chang,Tieshi Liu,Fan Zhang,Cheng Qian,Changwei Ji,Xiaozhi Zhao,Guangxiang Liu,Hongqian Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.095

IF: 7.6

2015-01-01

The Journal of Urology

Abstract:PURPOSE:We assessed the association between the R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and centrality index scores and perioperative outcomes, and determined the efficacy of each scoring system over the simple parameter of tumor size.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We conducted a retrospective review of the records of patients who underwent laparoscopic radio frequency ablation of renal tumors from February 2006 to April 2014 at our institution. Tumors were categorized using the R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and centrality index score, which were determined by analyzing preoperative imaging. The relationships between each variable and change in glomerular filtration rate, estimated blood loss, operative time and postoperative complications were examined.RESULTS:Laparoscopic radio frequency ablation was performed in 215 selected patients with preoperative imaging available. The interclass correlations coefficient of the 3 observers was 0.87, 0.84 and 0.82 for the C-Index, the R.E.N.A.L. and the PADUA scoring system, respectively. R.E.N.A.L. score, PADUA score and PADUA complexity were significantly associated with postoperative complications (p=0.040, 0.015 and 0.006, respectively). However, major complications were only associated with high PADUA complexity (chi-square 23.851, p <0.05). Each scoring system had a significant association with operative time and estimated blood loss (p <0.05), except that the C-index score had no relationship with estimated blood loss (p=0.083). The accuracy of each scoring system in predicting perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications was superior to that of tumor size.CONCLUSIONS:Each scoring system has an advantage over tumor size in describing tumor complexity and may help with surgical decision making. Further studies are required to validate their efficacy in evaluating the intraoperative and postoperative results after renal laparoscopic radio frequency ablation.
The Application Of Renal Nephrometry Scoring System In Predicting The Complications After Laparoscopic Renal Radiofrequency Ablation

Xiaofeng Chang,Changwei Ji,Xiaozhi Zhao,Fan Zhang,Huibo Lian,Shiwei Zhang,Guangxiang Liu,Gutian Zhang,Weidong Gan,Xiaogong Li,Hongqian Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0497

2014-01-01

Journal of Endourology

Abstract:Purpose: To investigate the clinical significance of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in evaluating the complications after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) of renal tumors.Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the records of all patients who underwent LRFA of renal tumors from February 2006 to March 2012 in our institution. Tumors were categorized as low (4-6), moderate (7-9), or high complexity (10-12) according to R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (NS), which was determined by analyzing preoperative imaging. Perioperative data were analyzed to determine the presence of complications.Results: LRFA was performed on 170 tumors in 170 selected patients with preoperative imaging available. Mean patient age was 55.9 years (range 26 to 81), and mean tumor size was 2.8 cm (range 0.9 to 4.9). Mean NS was 6.6 (range 4 to 12). Of the total tumors, 105 (61.7%) were categorized as low-, 46 (27.1%) as moderate-, and 19 (11.2%) as high-complexity lesions. Overall, there were 21 (12.4%) complications, including 6 (3.6%) grade IIIa and 15 (8.8%) grade I-II complications. There was a significant difference in complication rates among the low-(105 patients, 0%), moderate-(46 patients, 4.3%), and high-complexity (19 patients, 100%) groups, respectively (p < 0.05). NS was independently associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.87, 95% CI 1.17-3.04, p = 0.02) on multivariate analysis.Conclusions: The results of patients undergoing LRFA show that the R.E.N.A.L. NS is independently associated with the occurrence of complications. Therefore, the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system is useful in predicting the complication risks of patients who undergo LRFA, and may help with surgical decision making.
Is ten percent enough?

R. Gifford

Abstract:
[Treatment Outcome of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Renal Tumors of Moderate to High Complexity].

Min Qiu,You Long Zong,Bin Shuai Wang,Bin Yang,Chu Xiao Xu,Zheng Hui Sun,Min Lu,Lei Zhao,Jian Lu,Cheng Liu,Xiao Jun Tian,Lu Lin Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2023.05.009

2023-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the treatment outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the patients with renal tumors of moderate to high complexity (R.E.N.A.L. score 7-10).METHODS:In the study, 186 patients with a renal score of 7-10 renal tumors who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in Peking University Third Hospital from February 2016 to April 2021 were selected. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed after examination. The patients were followed-up, and their postoperative hemoglobin, creatinine, complications, and length of hospital stay recorded. The data were represented by mean±standard deviation or median (range).RESULTS:There were 128 males and 58 females in this group, aged (54.6±12.8) years, with body mass index of (25.4 ± 3.4) kg/m2; The tumors were located in 95 cases on the left and 91 cases on the right, with maximum diameter of (3.1±1.2) cm. The patient's preoperative hemoglobin was (142.9±15.8) g/L, and blood creatinine was 78 μmol/L (47-149 μmol/L). According to preoperative CT images, the R.E.N.A.L. score was 7 points for 43 cases, 8 points for 67 cases, 9 points for 53 cases, and 10 points for 23 cases. All the ope-rations were successfully completed, with 12 cases converted to open surgery. The operation time was 150 minutes (69-403 minutes), the warm ischemic time was 25 minutes (3-60 minutes), and the blood loss was 30 mL (5-1 500 mL). There were 9 cases of blood transfusions, with a transfusion volume of 800 mL (200-1 200 mL). Postoperative hemoglobin was (126.2±17.0) g/L. The preoperative crea-tinine was 78 μmol/L (47-149 μmol/L), the postoperative creatinine was 83.5 μmol/L (35-236 μmol/L), the hospital stay was 6 days (3-26 days), and surgical results achieved "the trifecta" in 87 cases (46.8%). In the study, 167 cases were followed up for 12 months (1-62 months), including 1 case with recurrence and metastasis, 4 cases with metastasis, and 2 cases with other tumors (1 case died).CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is safe and effective in the treatment of renal tumors with R.E.N.A.L. score of 7-10. Based on the complexity of the tumor, with the increase of difficulty, the warm ischemia time and operation time tend to increase gradually, while "the trifecta" rate gradually decreases. The complications of this operation are less, and the purpose of preserving renal function to the greatest extent is achieved.
Search for substances promoting the absorption of iron. Studies on absorption and side-effects.

L. Hallberg,L. Sölvell,H. Brise

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0954-6820.1966.TB19404.X

2009-04-24

Abstract:SUMMARY The effect of a number of substances on iron absorption was studied in man using a double radioiron method. The substances studied were carbohydrates, amino acids, inorganic salts, thiamine, and riboflavin. Three carbohydrates (sorbitol, mannitol and xylose) were found to increase the absorption of iron when given in large amounts. This absorption-promoting effect, however, was accompanied by an increase in side-effects. Ascorbic acid, which is known to increase iron absorption, was added to iron tablets. The side-effects of such tablets were higher than those of plain iron tablets containing the same amount of elemental iron. These studies show that it is necessary to study both the absorption and the side-effects to be able to judge the practical value of an iron preparation.
Analysis of Factors Influencing Mayo Adhesive Probability Score in Partial Nephrectomy.

Chaoyue Ji,Shiying Tang,Kunlin Yang,Gengyan Xiong,Dong Fang,Cuijian Zhang,Xuesong Li,Liqun Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.907938

2017-01-01

Medical Science Monitor

Abstract:BACKGROUND To retrospectively explore the factors influencing Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score in the setting of partial nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of 93 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy from September 2015 to June 2016 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative radiological elements were independently assessed by 2 readers. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate radiological and clinicopathologic influencing factors of MAP score. RESULTS On univariate analysis, MAP score was associated with male sex, older age, higher body mass index (BMI), history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and perirenal fat thickness (posterolateral, lateral, anterior, anterolateral, and medial). On multivariate analysis, only posterolateral perirenal fat thickness (odds ratio [OR]=0.88 [0.82-0.95], p=0.001), medial perirenal fat thickness (OR=0.90 [0.83-0.98], p=0.01), and history of diabetes mellitus (OR=5.42 [1.74-16.86], p=0.004) remained statistically significant. Tumor type (malignant vs. benign) was not statistically different. In patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), there was no difference in tumor stage or grade. CONCLUSIONS MAP score is significantly correlated with some preoperative factors such as posterolateral and medial perirenal fat thickness and diabetes mellitus. A new radioclinical scoring system including these patient-specific factors may become a better predictive tool than MAP score alone.
Ddd Score For Renal Tumor: An Intuitive And Comprehensive Anatomical Scoring System To Access The Outcomes Of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Zhong-Yuan Zhang,Xi Pan,Yu Fan,Cheng Shen,Wei Yu,Wen-Ke Han,Jian Lin,Gang Wang,Yi Song,Zheng Zhao,Jin-Rui Hao,Xue-Song Li,He Wang,Xiao-Ying Wang,Xiao-Chun Zhang,Li-Qun Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13903

2019-01-01

International Journal of Urology

Abstract:Objective To present a DDD scoring system in assessing the complexity and outcomes of retroperitoneoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for kidney tumor. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 232 patients who underwent retroperitoneoscopic nephron-sparing surgery between January 2013 and September 2017 for a renal tumor. Both the DDD score and RENAL score were used to classify the tumors. The DDD score consisted of the maximal tumor diameter inside the kidney, the maximal tumor depth into the medulla or collecting system and the minimal distance from the tumor to the main renal vessels. Results The DDD scoring systems were significantly associated with warm ischemia time (P = 0.007) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.017). There was an insignificant positive correlation between the DDD score and the operative time (P = 0.051). Meanwhile, the RENAL score had a significant correlation with the decreasing value of the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with high or moderate DDD scores had a 13.6-fold or 8.4-fold risk of overall complications than those with low DDD scores, respectively (all P < 0.05). As for RENAL score, patients with moderate scores had a 2.9-fold risk of overall complications compared with patients in the low scores group (P = 0.004). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the DDD score had the greatest area under the curve for overall complications (area under the curve 0.625, P = 0.009), which was more than the RENAL score (area under the curve 0.620, P = 0.013). Conclusions The DDD score is an intuitive renal tumor scoring system that is more effective than the RENAL score in complexity assessment, and marginally better in prediction of the risk of overall complications of retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery.
Mayo Adhesive Probability score to predict renal function following partial nephrectomy.

Edouard Nicaise,Benjamin Schmeusser,Yash Shah,Cameron Futral,Sriram Ambadi,Nahar Imtiaz,Dattatraya H. Patil,Kenneth Ogan,Viraj A. Master

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.379

IF: 45.3

2024-02-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:379 Background: Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score, which measures adherent perinephric fat in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), is associated with surgical complexity and cancer progression in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN). PN carries perioperative risk but preserves renal function versus radical nephrectomy (RN). We analyzed whether MAP score can predict long-term postoperative renal function in localized RCC patients who underwent PN. Methods: We reviewed our nephrectomy database to identify pT1-T3a RCC patients who underwent PN. Patients with metastatic disease, IVC thrombus, multiple masses, and prior nephrectomy were excluded. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2021 formula and patients with values <15mL/min/1.73m2 were excluded. We calculated MAP scores from preoperative cross-sectional imaging and dichotomized patients into low (1-3) versus high (4-5) cohorts. Continuous and categorical outcomes were compared using ANOVA and chi-square tests. A hierarchical generalized linear mixed effect model was used to evaluate predictors of long-term, postoperative eGFR following PN. Results: 314 patients were identified and 97 (30.9%) were classified with a high MAP score. These patients were older (64.5 vs. 58.3 years, p<0.001), more often male (85.6% vs. 52.5%, p<0.001), and white (79.4% vs. 67.7%, p=0.016). MAP score was associated with obesity (59.8% vs. 42.9%, p=0.006), diabetes (36.1% vs. 22.6%, p=0.013), hypertension (82.5% vs. 63.1%, p<0.001), and severe CCI (5+; 35.1% vs. 23.5%, p<0.001). No difference was observed in the rate of current or former smokers. Final tumor size was greater among patients with high MAP (4.1 vs. 3.4cm, p<0.001) but no difference was noted in pT stage. Rate of acute renal failure postoperatively (dialysis or eGFR <15 within 30 days) was similar between the two cohorts (1% vs. 1.4%, p=0.797). The tablepresents the model used to evaluate postoperative eGFR predictors. Conclusions: High MAP score predicts a greater eGFR decline following PN for localized RCC. Considering the risks of PN, MAP scoring may indicate surgical complexity and inform shared decision-making when considering nephron-sparing surgery for RCC. [Table: see text]

oncology
Recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in high complex renal tumor using propensity score matched analysis

Hwanik Kim,Jung Kwon Kim,Changhee Ye,Joon Hyeok Choi,Hakmin Lee,Jong Jin Oh,Sangchul Lee,Sung Kyu Hong,Seok-Soo Byun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82700-8

IF: 4.6

2021-02-03

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Abstract We evaluated the recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in patients with RENAL nephrometry score [RENAL] ≥ 10. A total of 474 patients (radical nephrectomy [RN, n = 236] & partial nephrectomy [PN, n = 238]) in a single tertiary referral institution from December 2003 to December 2019 were assessed. Functional outcomes, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate changes, relapse pattern, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using propensity score-matched analysis. The predictors of recurrence and survival were assessed by Cox-regression analysis. 44 patients in the RN group and 88 in the PN group were included without significant differences in preoperative clinical factors after matching. The PN patients achieved significantly higher renal function preservation rates (p < 0.001). There were five recurrences in RN and six in PN. The PN patients revealed 5-year RFS rate (86.8%), 5-year CSS rate (98.5%), and 5-year OS rate (98.5%) comparable to the RN patients (RFS: 88.7% [p = 0.780], CSS: 96.7% [p = 0.375], and OS: 94.3% [p = 0.248]). Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 23 had lower 5-year RFS rates (85.5%) and OS rates (95.6%) than those with BMI < 23 (RFS: 90.0% [p = 0.195], OS: 100% [p = 0.117]) without significance. The significant predictor of recurrence was the pathologic T stage (hazard ratio [HR] 3.99, 95% confidence [CI] 1.10–14.50, p = 0.036). The significant predictor of death was the R domain of the RENAL (HR 3.80, 95% CI 1.03–14.11, p = 0.046). PN, if technically feasible, could be considered to preserve renal function in patients with RENAL ≥ 10. Nonetheless, PN needs to be implemented with caution in some patients due to the higher potentiality for recurrence and poor survival.

multidisciplinary sciences
Associations between R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and survival outcomes in renal tumours

Xue Zhang,Qi Sun,Yangyang Qi,Yanyun Chen,Ying Xiong,Wei Xi,Zhongchang Miao,Xiaoxia Li,Xiaoling Quan,Jinglai Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyad174

2024-03-09

Abstract:Objective: The radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score could be used to predict surgical outcomes and renal tumour aggressiveness. We aimed to analyse its associations with survival outcomes. Methods: We included 1368 patients with sporadic, unilateral and non-metastatic renal tumours who received curative nephrectomy in Zhongshan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2019. Radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores were assigned by three urologists based on preoperative CT/MRI scans. Correlations between parameters or sum of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were analysed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and the multivariate Cox regression model. We further compared survival outcomes between patients who received partial nephrectomy and patients who received radical nephrectomy. Results: We observed statistically significant associations between all components of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores and oncologic outcomes, including R (radius) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival , P < 0.001), E (exophytic/endophytic) (overall survival, P = 0.003; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), N (nearness) (overall survival, P = 0.063; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), A (anterior/posterior) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.005), L (location) (overall survival, P = 0.008; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001) and suffix 'h' (overall survival, P = 0.237; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.034). Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were significantly different when stratified by radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score complexity group (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001). After adjusting for tumour stage and grade, radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score as continuous variables was an adverse independent risk factor for survival outcomes [P = 0.027, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.151 (1.016-1.303)] and recurrence-free survival [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.299 (1.125-1.501)]. For tumours with radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores of 4 and 5, partial nephrectomy showed a survival benefit than radical nephrectomy. Conclusion: Both components and complexity groups of the radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score are associated with survival outcomes in renal tumour patients.

Gender and Sexual License : The Plot Might Change but the Message Remains the Same ( A Response to

[A Rational Analysis of the Commonly Used Renal Tumor Scoring Systems in Predicting Surgical Outcomes of Cystic Renal Masses].

A Novel Nephrometry Scoring System for Predicting Peri-Operative Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Clinical Analysis Of The Padua And The Renal Scoring Systems For Renal Neoplasms: A Retrospective Study Of 245 Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

AB162. A novel “SSS+f” nephrometry score system to evaluate the technical complexity of nephron-sparing surgery

Comparing technology-based scoring systems for retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy

A “3s+f” Nephrometry Score System to Predict the Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery

The role of RENAL, PADUA, C-index, CSA nephrometry systems in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy

Comparison of the RENAL, PADUA, DAP, NePhRO, and SPARE scores for retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

The effect of a low dosage of testosterone on the I.C.S.H.- and F.S.H.-contents of intact and gonadectomized male and female rats; with additional data on body weight and various organ weights.

[Clinical Analysis of the Application of R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score for the Nephron Sparing Surgery].

The Comparison of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and Centrality Index Score in Predicting Perioperative Outcomes and Complications after Laparoscopic Radio Frequency Ablation of Renal Tumors

The Application Of Renal Nephrometry Scoring System In Predicting The Complications After Laparoscopic Renal Radiofrequency Ablation

Is ten percent enough?

[Treatment Outcome of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Renal Tumors of Moderate to High Complexity].

Search for substances promoting the absorption of iron. Studies on absorption and side-effects.

Analysis of Factors Influencing Mayo Adhesive Probability Score in Partial Nephrectomy.

Ddd Score For Renal Tumor: An Intuitive And Comprehensive Anatomical Scoring System To Access The Outcomes Of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Mayo Adhesive Probability score to predict renal function following partial nephrectomy.

Recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in high complex renal tumor using propensity score matched analysis

Associations between R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and survival outcomes in renal tumours