The Anatomical Layering Assessment: The Construction of Beauty
Carla de Sanctis Pecora
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s447865
2024-03-13
Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Abstract:Carla de Sanctis Pecora Dermatologie Private Practice, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence: Carla de Sanctis Pecora, Dermatologie Private Practice, Avenida Dr. Cardoso de Melo, 1308, conj 121, São Paulo, 04548-004, Brazil, Tel +5511 99621-9162, Email Restructuring an aging face from bone structure to the surface of the skin can be metaphorically compared to building and renovating a house. While each anatomical layer of the face undergoes an aging process of its own, there is also an interdependency of superficial structures on deeper layers, so that a change in one layer may lead to changes to the adjacent layers. This interaction among the structures deep into the skin, along with the skin's ability to envelope them is what determine the aspect of the aging face. Thus, a careful assessment of all the layers is imperative and we describe herein a step-by-step facial layering assessment and facial restructuring approach from bone structure to the surface of the skin to implement a treatment plan able to deliver a harmonious rejuvenating outcome. Keywords: layers, assessment, anatomy, aging process, combined treatment From superficial to deep tissues, aging is observed in all facial structures: Reduction of collagen and elastin content of the skin is attributable to a decrease in synthesis and excessive breakdown by up-regulated matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). 1 Some superficial fat pads, such as the nasolabial superficial fat pad, tend to suffer repositioning or hypertrophy, 2–4 while deep fat pockets undergo atrophy. Some muscles may become stronger due to a lifetime of over-activation (eg procerus), 5 so that the muscle contraction that has folded the skin along the same area repetitively, lead a temporary wrinkle to convert to a persistent wrinkle. 6 Moreover, for some muscles, the resting tone increases, and therefore the amplitude between contracted and relaxed muscle decreases, 7 while muscle tone may decrease for other muscles 4 Ligaments may present altered mechanical function secondary to changes in structures where they are inserted (eg, bone, skin). 4,5,8–10 Bone may suffer either remodeling (eg, expansion of the supraorbital ridges) or resorption; the latter observed for instance in the anterior and inferior aspects of the maxilla, leading to retrusion of the face. 8,11,12 Moreover, the onset, degree of involvement and the speed of onset of age-related changes differ depending not only on each layer but also individual characteristics (eg, genetic, ethnical background). 4 While each anatomical layer of the face undergoes an aging process of its own, there is also an interdependency of superficial structures on deeper layers, so that a change in one layer may lead to changes to the adjacent layers. 2,8 For instance, the bony components of the face impact the overall facial 3D contour because they provide the framework upon which the soft-tissue envelope rests. 12 Individuals with strong skeletal structure—bony features that provide good support to the overlying soft tissues age better than others with poor facial skeletal support. 9 This interplay of the structures deep into the skin along with skin's ability to envelope them is what determine the aspect of the aging face. Thus, a careful assessment of all the layers is imperative and we describe herein a step-by-step facial layering assessment and facial restructuring approach from bone structure to the surface of the skin to implement a treatment plan able to deliver a harmonious rejuvenating outcome. All procedures performed in this report involving human patients were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. The report was approved by a centralized institutional review board (Hospital e Centro de Reabilitação da Associação de Assistência à criança Deficiente (AACD) number: 73,808,223.5.0000.0085, approval date: September 26th 2023). Written informed consent has been provided by all the patients to have the case details and any accompanying images published. We report 5 cases of facial layering assessment and approach with hyaluronic acid (CPM-HA; Belotero ® range; Cohesive poly-densified matrix hyaluronic acid; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany), Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V; Ultherapy ® (Merz North America, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina)), undiluted calcium hydroxylapatite with 0.3% powdered lidocaine hydrochloride (CaHA (+); Radiesse Plus ® ; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany), diluted calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA; Radiesse ® ; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany), and Incobotulinum toxin (INCO; Xeomin< -Abstract Truncated-
dermatology