Abstract:Objective: Despite the encouraging pilot results of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) revealing its effectiveness in neuromodulation, there are also studies reporting inconsistent outcomes. Apart from previously studied factors, such as the differences in head model structures, anodal displacements, electrode shape and size, and connector position, the hypothesis that the inevitable spatial mismatch between the electrolyte buffer and electrode might shape current flow in the cerebral cortex was tested in this work, and our results potentially explain some of the reported inconsistent outcomes. Approach: A finite element head model was built using cylinder electrodes with an arbitrary diameter of 2 cm. Current flow induced by different spatial mismatch types, degrees, and directions was simulated for three montages targeting the left motor cortex. Voxel-level current density differences and Jaccard index values of different percentiles for each mismatched configuration were calculated and compared throughout the cerebral cortex to determine the effect of electrode-electrolyte geometric mismatch. Main results: Spatial mismatch between the electrolyte buffer and electrode affected the current density distribution in the cerebral cortex to different extents, depending on the position of the return electrode and mismatch type, degree, and direction. Single cortical voxel current-density variance induced by the 50% excess or insufficient mismatch was as high as 14.44% or 38.04%, respectively. Moreover, the distribution of variance changed directionally with the mismatch orientation. Compared with the insufficient mismatch and single-directional mismatch, the excessive and symmetrical mismatch caused a less obvious effect on the current density distribution of tDCS. Specifically, the symmetrical excess electrolyte caused around 2%-4% current density changes for all the montages, with different degrees and directions of mismatch. When the target position was fixed at C3, maximum sensitivity to the electrolyte-electrode mismatch was achieved with Iz as the return electrode, compared with the other two choices. Further, more than 20% voxels with >90% percentile of the peak current density values would shift position if >30% insufficient geometric mismatch occurred for montage C3-Iz. Significance: Our findings suggest that special attention is required regarding the spatial matching of the electrolyte buffer to the electrode during tDCS to avoid unexpected large changes in current distribution.

Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models

Investigating the Working Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

An Operational Approach for Optimizing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Simulating tDCS electrode placement to stimulate both M1 and SMA enhances motor performance and modulates cortical excitability depending on current flow direction

Anodic Electrode Displacement Affect the Efficiency of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Modeling Study on the Electrode Sizes

A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS

Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions

Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site

Electric field simulation and appropriate electrode positioning for optimized transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients: an in Silico model

Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches

The Pursuit of DLPFC: Non-neuronavigated Methods to Target the Left Dorsolateral Pre-frontal Cortex With Symmetric Bicephalic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Multi-Region Brain Stimulation Optimization Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Numerical simulations of electrode and current conditions during transcranial direct current stimulation

Simultaneous Stimulation Using Rtms and Tdcs Produces the Most Effective Modulation of Motor Cortical Excitability in Healthy Subjects: A Pilot Study

Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields

Towards optimized methodological parameters for maximizing the behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation

Individually optimized multi-channel tDCS for targeting somatosensory cortex

Effect of electrode-electrolyte spatial mismatch on transcranial direct current stimulation: a finite element modeling study

Neural Mechanisms of tDCS: Insights from an In-Vivo Rodent Model with Realistic Electric Field Strengths

Effect of Electrode Size and Maximum Current Limitation on Multichannel Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Optimization