Abstract:Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Learn More Submit Now Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here. Loading metrics Open Access Correction † Deceased. Concerns were raised about potential splice lines and about similarities in data shown across blot panels in Figs 3–5 of this article [1]. The authors noted that errors were made when assembling these figures. They provided images of the original blots (S1 File) for these figures and explained that lanes from the original blots were rearranged during figure preparation to cluster samples by experimental group. S1 File shows aligned experimental and control data for each patient: each lane in S1 File represents data for the same patient across all blots. S1 Table with this notice shows how the original lane (patient) numbers in S1 File correspond to results shown in the published figures. As is indicated in S1 Table and S1 File, corresponding lanes of the blots shown together in each figure panel do not show data for the same patients, and the α-tubulin blot in each figure panel includes data from multiple experimental groups. S2 File includes the raw quantification data derived from the western blots and from which the graphs in Figs 3–5 were generated. The authors confirmed that in quantifying the results of the western blot analyses, each individual's experimental data was normalized to their corresponding control blot (α-tubulin) data, as is shown in S2 File. For pSMAD analyses, the pSMAD and SMAD3 densitometry values were each normalized to α-tubulin and then the ratio was calculated. In Fig 5A and the corresponding densitometry analysis, phospho-NF-κB values were normalized to α-tubulin. The authors also included total NF-κB blots in the experiment (S3 File) but no major regulation was observed across samples and the total NF-κB data were not included in the quantitative analysis. In Table 2 of the published article [1], p values were erroneously reported as 0.000 in several cases. These should instead indicate "p<0.001" in each case. In Fig 5D of the published article [1], the numbers on the x axis should be CRP 10 n = 6. Additional raw data for this article [1] are provided in S4–S10 Files. The PLOS ONE Editors consider that the data in S1 File suffice to address the splicing and similarity concerns raised about the published figures. However, a member of PLOS ONE 's Editorial Board advised that given the way this study's data are presented it is difficult to ascertain whether the original data support the results reported in the article. The corresponding author, Kenneth C.H. Fearon, passed away in 2016. Any further questions about this work can be directed to Neil Johns. Fig 5A shows the lower bands from the phospho-NF-κB blots (p-NFKB) in S1 File. Figure labels do not correctly represent the results shown in α-tubulin panels; see S1 File for details. For Beclin, ATG5, SMAD3, and pSMAD3, symbols indicate differences in blot labels comparing Fig 3 and Fig 4 and S1 File: labels in S1 File are * WL 5%; ** no weight loss; + healthy control; & WL 10%. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s001 (DOCX) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s002 (JPG) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s003 (XLSX) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s004 (DOCX) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s005 (PDF) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s006 (PDF) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s007 (DOCX) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s008 (CSV) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s009 (PPTX) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s010 (PPTX) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953.s011 (PPTX) Citation: Johns N, Hatakeyama S, Stephens NA, Degen M, Degen S, Frieauff W, et al. (2024) Correction: Clinical Classification of Cancer Cachexia: Phenotypic Correlates in Human Skeletal Muscle. PLoS ONE 19(12): e0314953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314953 Published: December 2, 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Johns et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US

Correction: Quantifying the three-dimensional facial morphology of the laboratory rat with a focus on the vibrissae

[Effect of Whisker Trimming on Behavior and Barrel Cortex of Rat].

Correction: The role of artificial photo backgrounds of shelter dogs on pet profile clicking and the perception of sociability

Correction: Extended Synaptotagmin (ESyt) Triple Knock-Out Mice Are Viable and Fertile without Obvious Endoplasmic Reticulum Dysfunction

Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy

Spatial arrangement of the whiskers of harbor seals ( ) compared to whisker arrangements of house mice ( ) and brown rats ( )

Spatial arrangement of the whiskers of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) compared with whisker arrangements of house mice (Mus musculus) and brown rats (Rattus norvegicus)

Correction: Clinical Classification of Cancer Cachexia: Phenotypic Correlates in Human Skeletal Muscle

Comparative Cranial Geometric Morphometrics among Wistar Albino, Sprague Dawley, and WAG/Rij Rat Strains

Abstract P386: Rat Remap Initiative at the Rat Genome Database (RGD): A Resource of Integrated Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Data for Laboratory Rats

Evolution of the skull in arvicoline cricetids (Rodentia) according to 3D morphometric insights: Part 1. Morphological disparity of the palato-spheno-pterygoid complex

Development of PainFace software to simplify, standardize, and scale up mouse grimace analyses

Erratum: The shape of lipsmacking: socio-emotional regulation in bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) - CORRIGENDUM

Expression of concern: Natural copy number variation of tandemly repeated regulatory SNORD RNAs leads to individual phenotypic differences in mice

The Application of 3D Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics towards Refinement of the Piglet Grimace Scale

Bolstering geometric morphometrics sample sizes with damaged and pathologic specimens: Is near enough good enough?

MusMorph, a database of standardized mouse morphology data for morphometric meta-analyses

Correction: Capturing sexual contact patterns in modelling the spread of sexually transmitted infections: Evidence using Natsal-3

Geometric morphometrics of silky pocket mice ( Perognathus : Perognathinae: Rodentia) crania reveals new insights into their variation, evolution, and taxonomy

Corrigendum: A modified method for constructing experimental rat periodontitis model

Erratum to activation of the extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signal pathway and osteogenic factors in subchondral bone of patients with knee osteoarthritis