Time to enhancement of breast lesions and normal breast parenchyma in light of menopausal status and menstrual cycle for ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using compressed sensing

Ken Yamaguchi,Takahiko Nakazono,Ryoko Egashira,Shuichi Fukui,Koichi Baba,Takahiro Hamamoto,Shinichi Aishima,Katsuya Maruyama,Dominik Nickel,Hiroyuki Irie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2022.11.006
Abstract:Purpose: To assess the dependency of the Time to enhancement (TTE) of breast lesions and normal breast parenchyma from menopausal status and menstrual cycle using ultrafast compressed sensing (CS) -accelerated dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Methods: This institutional review board approved retrospective study included 89 breast cancers, 22 benign lesions and 131 normal breast parenchymal foci. A prototypical ultrafast DCE sequence obtained 30 phases with 2.9 s temporal resolution. Mean and median TTE of all breast cancers, benign lesions and normal breast parenchymal foci were assessed. we also assessed whether there were any differences in TTE regarding the menopausal status and menstrual cycle. Results: The TTE of breast cancer was significantly shorter than that of benign lesions and normal breast parenchymal foci in both the premenopausal status (5.8 vs. 8.7 and 8.7 s, respectively) (p = 0.0028 and < 0.0001, respectively) and postmenopausal status (5.8 vs. 11.6 and 11.6 s, respectively) (p < 0.0001 in both). The TTE of parenchymal foci in the premenopausal status was significantly shorter than that in the postmenopausal status (p = 0.0025). Although the TTE interval between cancer and parenchymal foci in premenopausal status is shorter than that in postmenopausal status, the AUCs in the pre- and postmenopausal status for differentiating breast cancer and parenchymal foci were comparable with using different cutoff TTE values. There were no differences in TTE regarding the menstrual cycle. Conclusions: The TTE derived from ultrafast CS-accelerated DCE MRI was useful to differentiate breast cancer from benign lesions and normal breast parenchymal foci in both pre- and postmenopausal status.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?