Fundamental investigation of impact of water and TFA additions in peptide sub/supercritical fluid separations
Jörgen Samuelsson,Marek Leśko,Linda Thunberg,Annika Langborg Weinmann,Fredrik Limé,Martin Enmark,Torgny Fornstedt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465203
IF: 4.601
2024-07-30
Journal of Chromatography A
Abstract:The retention of three peptides was studied under analytical and overloaded conditions at different concentrations of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and water added to the co-solvent methanol (MeOH). Four columns with different stationary phase properties, i.e., silica, diol, 2-ethylpyridine and cyanopropyl (CN) columns, were evaluated in this investigation. The overall aim was to get a deeper understanding on how column chemistry as well as water and TFA in the co-solvent affect the analytical and overloaded elution profiles using multivariate design of experiments and adsorption measurements of co-solvent components. Multivariate experimental design modeling indicated that water had on average around five times higher effect on the retention than the addition of TFA. The results also showed that the retention increases with the addition of TFA and water to the co-solvent on all columns except the CN column, on which the retention decreased. When examining the effect of adding water to the co-solvent, evidence of a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)-like retention mechanism was found on the three other column with more polar stationary phases. However, on the CN column water acted as an additive, decreasing the retention due to competition with the peptide for available adsorption surface. Adsorption isotherm measurements of the polar solvent MeOH showed that MeOH adsorbs much weaker on the CN column than on the other columns. Addition of TFA and water to the co-solvent substantially sharpened the elution profiles under both overloaded and analytical conditions. Adding a small amount of TFA (from 0% to 0.05%) to the co-solvent substantially improved the peak shape of the elution profiles, while further addition (from 0.05% to 0.15%) had only a minor effect on the elution profile shape. The reduced retention on the CN column could not be explained by TFA adsorption, which was very weak on all studied columns (retention factor, 0.05–0.15). One could therefore speculate that the ion-pairing complex formed between the peptide and TFA in the mobile phase, reduce the retention due to its reduced polarity. On the other columns displaying HILIC-like properties, the TFA probably just decreased the p H of the mobile phase, thereby promoting the partitioning of the peptide into the water-rich layer. Finally, peak deformation due to diluent–eluent mismatch was observed under overloaded conditions. This was most severe in the cases where MeOH adsorption to the stationary phase was strong and the peptides were only mildly retained. Adding 1,4-dioxan to the diluent resolved this issue.
chemistry, analytical,biochemical research methods