Low-molecular Weight Heparin for Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism in a Pregnant Woman

S. Laifer,R. Stiller,G. Dunston-Boone,J. Whetham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1614393
1999-10-01
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Abstract:ures occurring during the subsequent follow-up, the cumulative thromboembolic risk during follow-up would remain low whatever the strategy selected (1.2% to 2.6%) (Table 2). Fourth, the latter observation must also be considered in view of the high false positive rate of a diagnostic test (repeat US) performed in a population with a very low prevalence of DVT (0.9% to 5.7%). Even if the specificity of compression US were as high as 99%, 2 to 5 of every 10 positive US would be false positives (6). All these aspects need to be assessed in a formal costeffectiveness analysis. Fifth, the very low three-month thromboembolic risks in these four studies were obtained by means of a compression US technique limited to the examination of the common and superficial femoral, and the popliteal veins. This at least questions the affirmation by certain investigators that a complete, more time-consuming venous US examination (from the calf to the inferior vena cava) should be performed in all patients suspected of DVT (7). In conclusion, diagnosing DVT has become definitely more easy and reliable over the past fifteen years, especially thanks the development of venous compression US of lower limbs, which allows reducing the requirement for venography to a small minority of patients (0-6%). Because of the diminishing prevalence of DVT in the population of clinically suspected patients, appropriate, less resource-intensive diagnostic strategies, including DD measurement and PCP assessment, must be further studied to reduce the number of US and repeat US. If their safety and cost-effectiveness are confirmed, they should then be implemented in daily practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?