An intercomparison of EarthCARE cloud, aerosol, and precipitation retrieval products

Shannon L. Mason,Howard W. Barker,Jason N. S. Cole,Nicole Docter,David P. Donovan,Robin J. Hogan,Anja Hünerbein,Pavlos Kollias,Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras,Zhipeng Qu,Ulla Wandinger,Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-875-2024
IF: 4.184
2024-02-02
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Abstract:The objective of the Earth Cloud, Aerosol, and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) mission is to infer attributes of cloud, aerosol, precipitation, and radiation from observations made by four complementary instruments. This requires the development of single-instrument and multiple-instrument (i.e. synergistic) retrieval algorithms that employ measurements made by one, or more, of EarthCARE's cloud-profiling radar (CPR), atmospheric lidar (ATLID), and multi-spectral imager (MSI); its broadband radiometer (BBR) places the retrieved quantities in the context of the surface–atmosphere radiation budget. To facilitate the development and evaluation of ESA's EarthCARE production model prior to launch, sophisticated instrument simulators were developed to produce realistic synthetic EarthCARE measurements for simulated conditions provided by cloud-resolving models. While acknowledging that the physical and radiative representations of cloud, aerosol, and precipitation in the test scenes are based on numerical models, the opportunity to perform detailed evaluations wherein the "truth" is known provides insights into the performance of EarthCARE's instruments and retrieval algorithms. This level of omniscience will not be available for the evaluation of in-flight EarthCARE retrieval products, even during validation activities coordinated with ground-based and airborne measurements. In this study, we compare EarthCARE retrieval products both statistically across all simulated scenes and from a specific time series from a single scene.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?