Auricular Acupressure for Hemodialysis Patients with Insomnia: A Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
Yuchi Wu,Lihong Yang,Zhicong Zhong,Xiuqing Wu,Zhiren He,Hongyan Ma,Cun Cai,Yin Li,Xufang Wu,Bo Fu,Xiaoling Chen,Lixin Wang,Daixin Zhao,Xiangxin Meng,Airong Qi,Aicheng Yang,Lingli Li,Xusheng Liu,Chuan Zou,Qizhan Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2021.0332
Abstract:Background and objectives: The effect of auricular acupressure (AA) for maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with insomnia has been controversial. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of AA for MHD patients with chronic insomnia. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: This was a multicenter, double-blind (participant and assessor), randomized sham-controlled trial. A total of 133 subjects were randomized to receive AA on active points (AA group, n = 64) or on sham auricular acupressure (SAA) points (SAA group, n = 69) for 8 weeks and followed up for 12 weeks. AA was provided by assigned qualified nurses who were not involved in assessment. The primary outcome was the clinical response rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who reached a reduction of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score ≥3 in each group. Secondary outcomes included changes in PSQI scores over time, PSQI scores and hypnotics use at each visit, and changes in the weekly dose of hypnotics for drug-dependent subjects. Results: At week 8, the AA group yielded a higher clinical response rate than the SAA group (AA: 55% vs. SAA: 36%, odds ratio: 1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.2, p = 0.033). Both groups showed a reduction in PSQI global scores during treatment and follow-up, compared with the baseline, respectively. A significant change of PSQI global score was observed over time (F = 28.387, p < 0.001). PSQI global score of the AA group was relatively lower than that of the SAA group at each visit (p < 0.05 at week 16 and 20). For those depending on hypnotics, AA reduced their consumption of hypnotics. The intervention was safe, and its adherence was satisfactory. Conclusion: AA could serve as a complementary or alternative therapy for MHD patients with insomnia by improving their sleep quality and reducing their use of hypnotics. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03015766.