Exploring factors associated with self‐rated health in individuals with diabetes and its impact on quality of life: Evidence from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe

Rosa Marie Brückner,Aline Schönenberg,Rebecca Wientzek,Mandy Schreiber,Tino Prell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13522
IF: 4.53
2024-01-03
Journal of Diabetes
Abstract:Highlights Individuals with diabetes tend to report their health as less than very good more frequently compared to individuals without diabetes We have identified several factors that influence self‐rated health in individuals with diabetes. Depression, pain, and memory function emerged as the most influential factors. Self‐rated health was determined to be an independent predictor of quality of life. Background Self‐rated health (SRH), a measure of self‐reported general health, is a robust predictor of morbidity and mortality in various populations, including people with diabetes. Diabetes is negatively associated with SRH and quality of life (QoL). Little is known about how people with diabetes rate their health and which aspects influence the rating. Also, the predictive value of SRH on future QoL has not yet been evaluated. Methods We analyzed data from 46 592 participants of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Using linear regression, we aimed to determine which sociodemographic, socioeconomic, medical, social, mental, and health behavior factors determine SRH in people with diabetes. In addition, we analyzed the predictive value of SRH on future QoL using the generalized estimating equations procedure. Results We determined that country, current job situation, hospitalization, pain, polypharmacy, memory, eyesight, activities of daily living, number of chronic diseases, and depression are all linked to SRH. Together these variables explained 38% of the SRH's variance, whereas depression, pain, and memory had the greatest influence on SRH of people with diabetes. We also found that SRH independently predicted future QoL, supported by a regression coefficient of β = −1.261 (Wald chi‐square test, χ2 = 22.097, df = 1, p
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?