Development of a friction factor correlation applicable to both wet and dry foam flow in circular vertical pipes

Hyoin Lee,Eunsik Sung,Jaedeok Ko,Ji Hwan Jeong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2024.105509
IF: 5.477
2024-04-17
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Abstract:Highlights • Experimentally investigated foam flow in a vertical pipe. • Observed dry foam and wet foam, establishing transition criteria. • Proposed a friction factor applicable across both wet and dry foam regions. • New friction factor correlation is simple and showed promising results. Background Foam flow, distinguished by its low density and extensive specific surface area, is employed for the cleaning of plant systems. However, its dual nature as a gas-liquid mixture and a non-Newtonian fluid complicates the prediction of the frictional pressure drop. Methods This study constructed a laboratory-scale experimental setup to illustrate the upward flow behavior of aqueous foam in a vertical circular pipe, capturing the foam flow using a high-speed camera. Utilizing the collected data and images, a model was developed for the friction factor to predict the frictional pressure drop of the foam flow, under the assumption that the foam flow is a non-Newtonian, quasi-homogeneous, steady, and fully developed laminar flow. Significant findings Wet foam, characterized by small, uniformly distributed spherical bubbles, is observed at lower foam quality levels. In contrast, dry foam, marked by a larger mean bubble diameter, non-uniform bubble distributions, and slugs, is observed at higher foam quality levels. A notable inflection point in the frictional pressure drop is observed during the transition from wet to dry foam within a vertical pipe. The foam regime and frictional pressure drop characteristics of the foam flow show limited sensitivity to surfactant concentration within the experimental range. A correlation for friction factors, applicable to both wet and dry foam flows in vertical circular pipes, was developed based on the Reynolds number, exhibiting a prediction error of 23.6 %. Graphic abstract Download : Download high-res image (323KB) Download : Download full-size image
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?