Effects of Calcium Hydroxide Paste in Different Vehicles on Bacterial Reduction during Treatment of Teeth with Apical Periodontitis

Isabela N Rôças,José C Provenzano,Monica S Neves,Flávio R F Alves,Lucio S Gonçalves,José F Siqueira Jr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.10.008
Abstract:Introduction: This clinical study evaluated the antibacterial effects of calcium hydroxide associated with different vehicles during the treatment of infected teeth with apical periodontitis. Methods: Bacteriologic samples were taken from 90 necrotic root canals of teeth with apical periodontitis before (S1) and after preparation with a rotary nickel-titanium instrument system and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation (S2). The teeth were distributed in 3 groups according to the intracanal medication used, which consisted of a calcium hydroxide paste in glycerin, camphorated paramonochlorophenol/glycerin (CHPG), or 2% chlorhexidine for 1 week, and then another sample was taken (S3). The frequency of bacteria-positive cases and the reduction of bacterial counts were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: Substantial intracanal bacterial reduction was observed after preparation in the 3 groups (P < .001). After calcium hydroxide paste in glycerin medication, the number of bacteria-positive cases decreased from 20/29 (69%) to 17/29 (59%); however, the mean bacterial counts increased 8.4% from S2 to S3. Medication with CHPG reduced the number of bacteria-positive cases from 17/29 (59%) to 15/29 (52%), with a significant mean S2-S3 reduction of 71% (P < .05). In the chlorhexidine group, the number of bacteria-positive cases decreased from 21/30 (70%) to 17/30 (57%) after medication, with a mean S2-S3 reduction of 55%, which, however, was not statistically significant (P > .05). Intergroup comparisons showed no significant differences (P > .05). Conclusion: Comparison between the 3 calcium hydroxide pastes showed no significant differences in antibacterial effectiveness in the main root canal. However, only the CHPG paste showed a significant reduction in bacterial counts when postpreparation and postmedication samples were compared.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?