Two randomised crossover multicentre studies investigating gastrointestinal symptoms after bread consumption in individuals with non-coeliac wheat sensitivity: do wheat species and fermentation type matter?
Marlijne Cg de Graaf,Emma Timmers,Bo Bonekamp,Gonny van Rooy,Ben Jm Witteman,Peter R Shewry,Alison Lovegrove,Antoine Hp America,Luud Jwj Gilissen,Daniel Keszthelyi,Fred Jph Brouns,Daisy M A E Jonkers,Marlijne C.G. de Graaf,Ben J.M. Witteman,Peter R. Shewry,Antoine H.P. America,Luud J.W.J. Gilissen,Fred J.P.H. Brouns,Daisy M.A.E. Jonkers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.02.008
2024-02-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Many individuals reduce their bread intake because they believe wheat causes their gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Different wheat species and processing methods may affect these responses.OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of 6 different bread types (prepared from 3 wheat species and 2 fermentation conditions) on GI symptoms in individuals with self-reported noncoeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS).METHODS: Two parallel, randomized, double-blind, crossover, multicenter studies were conducted. NCWS individuals, in whom coeliac disease and wheat allergy were ruled out, received 5 slices of yeast fermented (YF) (study A, n = 20) or sourdough fermented (SF) (study B, n = 20) bread made of bread wheat, spelt, or emmer in a randomized order on 3 separate test days. Each test day was preceded by a run-in period of 3 d of a symptom-free diet and separated by a wash-out period of ≥7 d. GI symptoms were evaluated by change in symptom score (test day minus average of the 3-d run-in period) on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (ΔVAS), comparing medians using the Friedman test. Responders were defined as an increase in ΔVAS of ≥15 mm for overall GI symptoms, abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, bloating, and/or flatulence.RESULTS: GI symptoms did not differ significantly between breads of different grains [YF bread wheat median ΔVAS 10.4 mm (IQR 0.0-17.8 mm), spelt 4.9 mm (-7.6 to 9.4 mm), emmer 11.0 mm (0.0-21.3 mm), P = 0.267; SF bread wheat 10.5 mm (-3.1 to 31.5 mm), spelt 11.3 mm (0.0-15.3 mm), emmer 4.0 mm (-2.9 to 9.3 mm), P = 0.144]. The number of responders was also comparable for both YF (6 to wheat, 5 to spelt, and 7 to emmer, P = 0.761) and SF breads (9 to wheat, 7 to spelt, and 8 to emmer, P = 0.761).CONCLUSIONS: The majority of NCWS individuals experienced some GI symptoms for ≥1 of the breads, but on a group level, no differences were found between different grains for either YF or SF breads.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04084470 (https://classic.CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04084470).
nutrition & dietetics