THE TIMED “UP & GO” TEST AND MANUAL BUTTON SCORE ARE USEFUL PREDICTORS OF FUNCTIONAL DECLINE IN BASIC AND INSTRUMENTAL ADL IN COMMUNITY‐DWELLING OLDER PEOPLE
K. Okumiya,K. Matsubayashi,Tomoko Nakamura,M. Fujisawa,Y. Osaki,Yoshinori Doi,T. Ozawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1532-5415.1999.TB07252.X
1999-04-01
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Abstract:could not walk, and 26% were confined or bed-bound. Forty-three percent had memory problems, and 71 % needed help with adaptive tasks. Although only 23% lived alone, 41% had a caregiver with limitations as well. The two major health problems were stroke (15%) and cancer (17%). The median follow-up from program entry was 2.5 years, and the median length of stay (LOS) was 98 days. Median LOS was longest (183 days) in those patients eventually discharged to the nursing home. Of the total sample, 44% died (n = 161), with 41 patients dying in the program (11%) and 120 patients dying after discharge (median time to death approximately 3 months). Patients were nonexclusively divided into several categories to look for differences relating to ethnicity (non-white, n = 101), age greater than 75 (n = 168), improvement in functional status (n = 26), readmission to the program (n = 63) , death after discharge (n = 120), less than 3-month length of s:ay (n = 175), and greater than %month LOS (n = 189). There were no significant differences between any of the groups and the total population except in the “improved” and “died after discharge” categories. The functionally improved group had relatively high rates of social support compared with the mean for the total population (60% were married vs 39%, P < .05; 53% lived with a spouse vs. 31%, P < .05) and low admission rates to the nursing home (8% vs 28%, P < .05). The patients who died after discharge had lower rates of total IADL dependency (57% vs 71%, P < .05), higher rates of cancer (25% vs 17%, P < .05) and a 27% vs 17% readmission rate (P < .05). Mutually exclusive categories determined by outcome were also considered using discharge status: died in program (n = 41), discharged to a nursing home (NH, n = 65), discharged to community care (n = 37), and discharged to the hospital (n = 114). A high percentage of patients who were married died in the program or were discharged to a NH (56% and 52%, respectively vs 39%, P < .05). Fewer patients in the discharge to NH category were separated or divorced (20% vs 32%, P <,.05), and a high percentage of patients who died while in program lived with a spouse (49% vs 31%, P < .05). Patients discharged from HBPC to the community had the lowest mortality (27% vs 44%, P < .05) and had more neurological diagnoses (16% vs 6%, P < .05). Those patients discharged to the hospital had high readmission rates to HBPC (28% vs 17%, P < .05), less difficulty with dressing and bowel incontinence (1% and 3 % vs 6 and 9%, respectively, P < .05), and lower rates of caregivers with moderate to severe limitations (31% vs 41%, P < .05) but had the highest percentage of patients listed without a caregiver (34% vs 24%, P < .05). The selection process for the PAVAHCS HBPC program chose older, frail patients who were at high risk of dying and whose caregivers were often limited as well. Patients with social support (married or living with spouse) were more likely to be able to die at home or delay N H placement. Few patients improved their functional status, and almost onethird of the patients admitted to the hospital from HBPC or who eventually died were readmitted into HBPC. Nearly half of the patients admitted into the PAVA HBPC program died within a the median 2.5-year follow-up; 11 % of those admitted died while in the program; the median time to death after discharge from the program was 3 months.