Clonal plants: beyond the patterns—ecological and evolutionary dynamics of asexual reproduction

O. Honnay,H. Jacquemyn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9408-z

IF: 2.074

2010-07-17

Evolutionary Ecology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Nursing home staff networks and COVID-19

M. Keith Chen,Judith A. Chevalier,Elisa F. Long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015455118

IF: 11.1

2020-12-28

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract:Significance Nursing homes account for 40% of US COVID-related fatalities as of August 31, highlighting the urgent need to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission routes in these facilities. Our large-scale analysis of smartphone location data reports half a million individuals entering a nursing home following the March 13 federal ban on visitors. With 5.1% of these individuals entering two or more facilities, a nursing home snapshot network emerges. More connections, likely arising from contractors and staff working at multiple facilities, are highly predictive of COVID-19 cases, whereas traditional regulatory quality metrics are unimportant in predicting outbreak size. With an estimated 49% of nursing home cases attributable to cross-facility staff movement, attention to highly connected nursing facilities is warranted.

multidisciplinary sciences
COVID-19 outbreaks in residential aged care facilities: an agent-based modeling study

Fenella McAndrew,Rachel Sacks-Davis,Romesh G. Abeysuriya,Dominic Delport,Daniel West,Indra Parta,Suman Majumdar,Margaret Hellard,Nick Scott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344916

IF: 5.2

2024-05-22

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Introduction: A disproportionate number of COVID-19 deaths occur in Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), where better evidence is needed to target COVID-19 interventions to prevent mortality. This study used an agent-based model to assess the role of community prevalence, vaccination strategies, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) on COVID-19 outcomes in RACFs in Victoria, Australia. Methods: The model simulated outbreaks in RACFs over time, and was calibrated to distributions for outbreak size, outbreak duration, and case fatality rate in Victorian RACFs over 2022. The number of incursions to RACFs per day were estimated to fit total deaths and diagnoses over time and community prevalence. Total infections, diagnoses, and deaths in RACFs were estimated over July 2023–June 2024 under scenarios of different: community epidemic wave assumptions (magnitude and frequency); RACF vaccination strategies (6-monthly, 12-monthly, no further vaccines); additional non-pharmaceutical interventions (10, 25, 50% efficacy); and reduction in incursions (30% or 60%). Results: Total RACF outcomes were proportional to cumulative community infections and incursion rates, suggesting potential for strategic visitation/staff policies or community-based interventions to reduce deaths. Recency of vaccination when epidemic waves occurred was critical; compared with 6-monthly boosters, 12-monthly boosters had approximately 1.2 times more deaths and no further boosters had approximately 1.6 times more deaths over July 2023–June 2024. Additional NPIs, even with only 10–25% efficacy, could lead to a 13–31% reduction in deaths in RACFs. Conclusion: Future community epidemic wave patterns are unknown but will be major drivers of outcomes in RACFs. Maintaining high coverage of recent vaccination, minimizing incursions, and increasing NPIs can have a major impact on cumulative infections and deaths.

public, environmental & occupational health
A severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nosocomial cluster with inter-facility spread: Lessons learned

Aurora E. Pop-Vicas,Laura Anderson,Gabrielle Hatas,Linda Stevens,Ashley Buys,David O'Connor,Nancy Wilson,Kasen Riemersma,Luis A Haddock Soto,Abby Richardson,Christine Clemens,Jennylynde Packham,Daniel Shirley,Nasia Safdar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.172

2024-01-05

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract:Background: Despite infection control guidance, sporadic nosocomial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks occur. We describe a complex severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cluster with interfacility spread during the SARS-CoV-2 δ (delta) pandemic surge in the Midwest. Setting: This study was conducted in (1) a hematology-oncology ward in a regional academic medical center and (2) a geographically distant acute rehabilitation hospital. Methods: We conducted contact tracing for each COVID-19 case to identify healthcare exposures within 14 days prior to diagnosis. Liberal testing was performed for asymptomatic carriage for patients and staff. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted for all available clinical isolates from patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) to identify transmission clusters. Results: In the immunosuppressed ward, 19 cases (4 patients, 15 HCWs) shared a genetically related SARS-CoV-2 isolate. Of these 4 patients, 3 died in the hospital or within 1 week of discharge. The suspected index case was a patient with new dyspnea, diagnosed during preprocedure screening. In the rehabilitation hospital, 20 cases (5 patients and 15 HCWs) positive for COVID-19, of whom 2 patients and 3 HCWs had an isolate genetically related to the above cluster. The suspected index case was a patient from the immune suppressed ward whose positive status was not detected at admission to the rehabilitation facility. Our response to this cluster included the following interventions in both settings: restricting visitors, restricting learners, restricting overflow admissions, enforcing strict compliance with escalated PPE, access to on-site free and frequent testing for staff, and testing all patients prior to hospital discharge and transfer to other facilities. Conclusions: Stringent infection control measures can prevent nosocomial COVID-19 transmission in healthcare facilities with high-risk patients during pandemic surges. These interventions were successful in ending these outbreaks.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nosocomial transmission dynamics, a retrospective cohort study of two healthcare-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clusters in a district hospital in England during March and April 2020

David S. Leeman,Melanie M. Pathiraja,Jennifer A. Taylor,Tahira Z. Adnan,Ioannis Baltas,Adam Ioannou,Srikanth R. S. Iyengar,Rachel A. Mearkle,Thomas J. Stockdale,Koenraad Van Den Abbeele,Sooria Balasegaram,Thomas S.-G. Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.483

2021-11-22

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract:Abstract Objective: To understand the transmission dynamics of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a hospital outbreak to inform infection control actions. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: General medical and elderly inpatient wards in a hospital in England. Methods: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients were classified as community or healthcare associated by time from admission to onset or positivity using European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control definitions. COVID-19 symptoms were classified as asymptomatic, nonrespiratory, or respiratory. Infectiousness was calculated from 2 days prior to 14 days after symptom onset or positive test. Cases were defined as healthcare-associated COVID-19 when infection was acquired from the wards under investigation. COVID-19 exposures were calculated based on symptoms and bed proximity to an infectious patient. Risk ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated from univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 153 patients, 65 were COVID-19 patients and 45 of these were healthcare-associated cases. Exposure to a COVID-19 patient with respiratory symptoms was associated with healthcare-associated infection irrespective of proximity (aOR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.6.3–8.87). Nonrespiratory exposure was only significant within 2.5 m (aOR, 5.21; 95% CI, 1.15–23.48). A small increase in risk ratio was observed for exposure to a respiratory patient for >1 day compared to 1 day from 2.04 (95% CI, 0.99–4.22) to 2.36 (95% CI, 1.44–3.88). Conclusions: Respiratory exposure anywhere within a 4-bed bay was a risk, whereas nonrespiratory exposure required bed distance ≤2.5 m. Standard infection control measures required beds to be >2 m apart. Our findings suggest that this may be insufficient to stop SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We recommend improving cohorting and further studies into bed distance and transmission factors.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Integrated Genomic and Social Network Analyses of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Transmission in the Healthcare Setting

Jocelyn Keehner,Shira R Abeles,Christopher A Longhurst,Lucy E Horton,Frank E Myers,Lindsay Riggs-Rodriguez,Mohammed Ahmad,Sally Baxter,Aaron Boussina,Kalen Cantrell,Priscilla Cardenas,Peter De Hoff,Robert El-Kareh,Jennifer Holland,Daryn Ikeda,Kirk Kurashige,Louise C Laurent,Stefan Aigner,Kristian G Andersen,Catelyn Anderson,Nathan A Baer,Tom Barber,Marco Bauk,Jennifer N Beck,Pedro Belda-Ferre,Maryann Betty,Amanda Birmingham,Anelizze Castro-Martinez,Willi Cheung,Peter De Hoff,Kathleen M Fisch,Karthik Gangavarapu,Isabella Gargano,Abbas Hakim,Shania Harsono,Benjamin Henson,Charlotte Hobbs,Jacqueline Holmes,Kristen Jepsen,Rob Knight,Ezra Kurzban,Louise C Laurent,Clarisse A Marotz,Nathaniel L Matteson,Niema Moshiri,Toan T Ngo,Tyler R Ostrander,Sarah Perkins,Ashley Plascencia,Andrea Rivera,Ariana Rivera,Rodolfo A Salido,Shashank Sathe,Phoebe Seaver,Madison Schwab,Anthony Veder,Gene W Yeo,Mark Zeller,Andrew Lucas,David Pride,Shashank Sathe,Allen R Tran,Tetyana I Vasylyeva,Gene Yeo,Rob Knight,Joel O Wertheim,Francesca J Torriani,for the SEARCH Alliance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad738

IF: 20.999

2024-01-17

Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract:Background Infection prevention (IP) measures are designed to mitigate the transmission of pathogens in healthcare. Using large-scale viral genomic and social network analyses, we determined if IP measures used during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic were adequate in protecting healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients from acquiring SARS-CoV-2. Methods We performed retrospective cross-sectional analyses of viral genomics from all available SARS-CoV-2 viral samples collected at UC San Diego Health and social network analysis using the electronic medical record to derive temporospatial overlap of infections among related viromes and supplemented with contact tracing data. The outcome measure was any instance of healthcare transmission, defined as cases with closely related viral genomes and epidemiological connection within the healthcare setting during the infection window. Between November 2020 through January 2022, 12 933 viral genomes were obtained from 35 666 patients and HCWs. Results Among 5112 SARS-CoV-2 viral samples sequenced from the second and third waves of SARS-CoV-2 (pre-Omicron), 291 pairs were derived from persons with a plausible healthcare overlap. Of these, 34 pairs (12%) were phylogenetically linked: 19 attributable to household and 14 to healthcare transmission. During the Omicron wave, 2106 contact pairs among 7821 sequences resulted in 120 (6%) related pairs among 32 clusters, of which 10 were consistent with healthcare transmission. Transmission was more likely to occur in shared spaces in the older hospital compared with the newer hospital (2.54 vs 0.63 transmission events per 1000 admissions, P < .001). Conclusions IP strategies were effective at identifying and preventing healthcare SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
Social Distancing and Isolation Strategies to Prevent and Control the Transmission of COVID-19 and Other Infectious Diseases in Care Homes for Older People: An International Review

Sarah Sims,Ruth Harris,Shereen Hussein,Anne Marie Rafferty,Amit Desai,Sinead Palmer,Sally Brearley,Richard Adams,Lindsay Rees,Joanne M. Fitzpatrick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063450

IF: 4.614

2022-03-15

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Older people living in care homes are at high risk of poor health outcomes and mortality if they contract COVID-19 or other infectious diseases. Measures used to protect residents include social distancing and isolation, although implementation is challenging. This review aimed to assess the social distancing and isolation strategies used by care homes to prevent and control the transmission of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. Seven electronic databases were searched: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, HMIC, Social Care Online, and Web of Science Core Collection. Grey literature was searched using MedRxiv, PDQ-Evidence, NICE Evidence Search, LTCCovid19.org and TRIP. Extracted data were synthesised using narrative synthesis and tabulation. 103 papers were included (10 empirical studies, seven literature reviews, and 86 policy documents). Strategies used to prevent and control the transmission of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases included social distancing and isolation of residents and staff, zoning and cohorting of residents, restriction of resident movement/activities, restriction of visitors and restriction of staff working patterns. This review demonstrates a lack of empirical evidence and the limited nature of policy documentation around social distancing and isolation measures in care homes. Evaluative research on these interventions is needed urgently, focusing on the well-being of all residents, particularly those with hearing, vision or cognitive impairments.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
A model-based assessment of social isolation practices for COVID-19 outbreak response in residential care facilities

Cameron Zachreson,Ruarai Tobin,Camelia Walker,Eamon Conway,Freya M Shearer,Jodie McVernon,Nicholas Geard

2024-09-02

Abstract:Residential aged-care facilities (RACFs, also called long-term care facilities, aged care homes, or nursing homes) have elevated risks of respiratory infection outbreaks and associated disease burden. During the COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation policies were commonly used in these facilities to prevent and mitigate outbreaks. We refer specifically to general isolation policies that were intended to reduce contact between residents, without regard to confirmed infection status. Such policies are controversial because of their association with adverse mental and physical health indicators and there is a lack of modelling that assesses their effectiveness. We developed an agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission in a structured population, intended to represent the salient characteristics of a residential care environment. Using our model, we generated stochastic ensembles of simulated outbreaks and compared summary statistics of outbreaks simulated} under different mitigation conditions. Our study focuses on the marginal impact of general isolation (reducing social contact between residents), regardless of confirmed infection. In the absence of any asymptomatic screening, general isolation of residents to their rooms reduced median cumulative cases by approximately 27%. However, when conducted concurrently with asymptomatic screening and isolation of confirmed cases, general isolation reduced the median number of cumulative infections by only 12% in our simulations. Our simulations showed that general isolation of residents did not provide substantial benefits beyond those achieved through screening, isolation of confirmed cases, and deployment of PPE. Our conclusions are sensitive to assumptions about the proportion of total contacts in a facility accounted for by casual interactions between residents.

Populations and Evolution
Preventing the transmission of COVID-19 and other coronaviruses in older adults aged 60 years and above living in long-term care: a rapid review

Patricia Rios,Amruta Radhakrishnan,Chantal Williams,Naveeta Ramkissoon,Ba' Pham,Gordon V Cormack,Maura R Grossman,Matthew P Muller,Sharon E Straus,Andrea C Tricco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01486-4

2020-09-25

Abstract:Background: The objective of this review was to examine the current guidelines for infection prevention and control (IPAC) of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) or other coronaviruses in adults 60 years or older living in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, pre-print servers, clinical trial registries, and relevant grey literature sources were searched until July 31, 2020, using database searching and an automated method called Continuous Active Learning® (CAL®). All search results were processed using CAL® to identify the most likely relevant citations that were then screened by a single human reviewer. Full-text screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal were completed by a single reviewer and verified by a second. Results: Nine clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were included. The most common recommendation in the CPGs was establishing surveillance and monitoring systems followed by mandating the use of PPE; physically distancing or cohorting residents; environmental cleaning and disinfection; promoting hand and respiratory hygiene among residents, staff, and visitors; and providing sick leave compensation for staff. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests robust surveillance and monitoring along with support for IPAC initiatives are key to preventing the spread of COVID-19 in LTCF. However, there are significant gaps in the current recommendations especially with regard to the movement of staff between LTCF and their role as possible transmission vectors. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020181993.
Unraveling the Modes of Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) During a Nursing Home Outbreak: Looking Beyond the Church Superspreading Event

Helene A C M Voeten,Reina S Sikkema,Marjolein Damen,Bas B Oude Munnink,Carla Arends,Ellen Stobberingh,Ellen Hoogervorst,Marion P G Koopmans,Ewout Fanoy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1664

IF: 20.999

2020-10-29

Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract:Abstract Background An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a nursing home in the Netherlands, following an on-site church service held on 8 March 2020, triggered an investigation to unravel sources and chain(s) of transmission. Methods Epidemiological data were collected from registries and through a questionnaire among church attendees. Symptomatic residents and healthcare workers (HCWs) were tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). Sequences from a selection of people from the same area were included as community reference. Results After the church service, 30 of 39 attendees (77%) developed symptoms; 14 (11 residents and 3 nonresidents) were tested and were positive for COVID-19. In the following 5 weeks, 62 of 300 residents (21%) and 30 of 640 HCWs (5%) tested positive for COVID-19; 21 of 62 residents (34%) died. The outbreak was controlled through a cascade of measures. WGS of samples from residents and HCWs identified a diversity of sequence types, grouped into 8 clusters. Seven resident church attendees all were infected with distinct viruses, 4 of which belonged to 2 larger clusters in the nursing home. Conclusions Although initial investigation suggested the church service as the source of the outbreak, detailed analysis showed a more complex picture, most consistent with widespread regional circulation of the virus in the weeks before the outbreak, and multiple introductions into the nursing home before the visitor ban. The findings underscore the importance of careful outbreak investigations to understand SARS-CoV-2 transmission to develop evidence-based mitigation measures.

immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
National Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on the Mental Health of Australian Residential Aged Care Residents and Staff

Aida Brydon,Sunil Bhar,Colleen Doyle,Frances Batchelor,Harry Lovelock,Helen Almond,Leander Mitchell,Maja Nedeljkovic,Steven Savvas,Viviana Wuthrich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2021.1985671

2021-10-11

Clinical Gerontologist

Abstract:This study is the first to obtain data on the prevalence of, contributors to, and supports required for, pandemic-related distress within the residential aged care sector in Australia. A nested mixed-methods approach was used to examine aged care leaders' opinions about the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of aged care residents and staff.A total of 288 senior staff of Australian residential aged care facilities (care managers, clinical care coordinators, and lifestyle team leaders; mean age = 52.7 years, SD = 10.3) completed an online survey between 10th September and 31st October 2020.On average, nearly half of their residents experienced loneliness (41%) and a third experienced anxiety in response to COVID-19 (33%). The most frequently noted contributors to poor mental health among residents were restrictions to recreational outings and watching news coverage relating to COVID-19. Participants emphasized the need for increased access to counseling services and improved mental health training amongst staff. Residential care staff were similarly impacted by the pandemic. More than a third of staff were reported as anxious (36%) and 20% depressed, in response to COVID-19. Staff were worried about introducing COVID-19 into their facility and were impacted by news coverage of COVID-19. Staff would feel supported by financial assistance and by increased staff-resident ratios.Senior staff perceive that the mental health of Australian aged care residents and staff was negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The most noted contributors were identified, as was the mental health support for aged care communities.This study provides government and policymakers with clear intervention targets for supporting the sector. Clinicians can support residential aged care communities by providing on-site or telehealth counseling, and upskill and train residential aged care staff on how to respond to the emotional needs of residents in response to COVID-19.

psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Public health rapid response in managing COVID-19 outbreaks in residential aged care facilities: a regional public health unit perspective

Mohammad Rashidul Hashan,Jacina Walker,Margaret Charles,Susie Le Brasse,Danielle Odorico,Nicolas Smoll,Michael Kirk,Robert Booy,Gulam Khandaker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.36

2024-10-23

Abstract:We describe here the impact of managing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks, during January-August 2022, in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Central Queensland, Australia, following the deployment of a public health rapid response team (PHRRT, comprising a medical officer, a communicable disease nurse, and an epidemiologist) from a regional public health unit (PHU). Our existing vaccine preventable diseases surveillance framework was used in identifying any symptomatic resident, triggering a PHRRT response. We found that the Hospital in the Home (HiTH) admission and death events were significantly lower after the introduction of the PHRRT than in the outbreaks that occurred before. Based on our experience with a PHRRT-led approach in mitigating the burden of outbreaks, we recommend regular reflection on optimising resources and practices in RACFs. Effective communication from PHUs can improve the RACFs' preparedness and capacity to respond, and can inform the best practice model to protect the highly susceptible elderly residents and their staff.
Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in congregate living settings: a multicenter prospective study

Jerome A Leis,Christina K Chan,Charlie Tan,James Callahan,Victoria Serapion,Brigitte Pascual,Wayne Lee,Jaclyn O'Brien,Neethu R Thomas,Heather Candon,Matthew Crittenden,Alex Kiss,Adrienne K Chan,Marianna Ofner,Jeff E Powis,Jerome A. Leis,Christina K. Chan,Neethu R. Thomas,Jeff E. Powis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.50

2024-04-03

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract:Background: Older adults residing in congregate living settings (CLS) such as nursing homes and independent living facilities remain at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019. We performed a prospective multicenter study of consecutive severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposures to identify predictors of transmission in this setting. Methods: Consecutive resident SARS-CoV-2 exposures across 17 CLS were prospectively characterized from 1 September 2022 to 1 March 2023, including factors related to environment, source, and exposed resident. Room size, humidity, and ventilation were measured in locations where exposures occurred. Predictors were incorporated in a generalized estimating equation model adjusting for the correlation within CLS. Results: Among 670 consecutive exposures to SARS-CoV-2 across 17 CLS, transmission occurred among 328 (49.0%). Increased risk was associated with nursing homes (odds ratio (OR) = 90.8; 95% CI, 7.8–1047.4), Jack and Jill rooms (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3–3.6), from source who was pre-symptomatic (OR = 11.2; 95% CI, 4.1–30.9), symptomatic (OR = 6.5; 95% CI, 1.4–29.9), or rapid antigen test positive (OR = 35.6; 95% CI, 5.6–225.6), and in the presence of secondary exposure (OR = 6.3; 95% CI, 1.6–24.0). Exposure in dining room was associated with reduced risk (OR = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.005–0.08) as was medium room size (OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2–0.6). Recent vaccination of exposed resident (OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–1.0) and increased ventilation of room (OR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8–1.0) were marginally associated with reduced risk. Conclusion: Prospective assessment of SARS-CoV-2 exposures in CLS suggests that source characteristics and location of exposure are most predictive of resident transmission. These findings can inform risk assessment and further opportunities to prevent transmission in CLS.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak investigation at a storage and distribution centre in England: an assessment of worker- and workplace-related risk factors

Amber I. Raja,Gillian Nicholls,Matthew Coldwell,Karin van Veldhoven,Vince Sandys,Barry Atkinson,Ian Nicholls,Antony Spencer,Alice Graham,Hannah Higgins,Christina Atchison,Chris Keen,Tony Fletcher,Neil Pearce,Elizabeth B. Brickley,Yiqun Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60194-4

IF: 4.6

2024-04-27

Scientific Reports

Abstract:An outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 (1 March to 10 May 2021) with an attack rate of 26.5% among approximately 1150 workers at a storage and distribution centre in England prompted a multidisciplinary outbreak investigation (5 May to 6 August 2021), with the aim of better understanding worker- and workplace-related risk factors for viral transmission in the warehousing sector. Overall, environmental factors (e.g., ventilation, humidity and temperature) were assessed to be appropriate at the facility. Nevertheless, 39 (51.3%) surface samples from across the site tested positive for low/ very low levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (Ct value ≥ 32.0 for all). Among the study participants, of whom 35.6% were confirmed or suspected cases, 95.5% reported having received COVID-19 prevention training, 100.0% reported handwashing, and 80.0% reported use of face coverings at work. Notably, 43.9% and 19.0% reported working with a symptomatic and a positive contact respectively. Furthermore, 80.5% and 46.3% had concerns regarding reduction in their income and future unemployment, respectively, due to self-isolation. The findings of this study suggest that, in addition to targeted workplace infection control measures and tailored work area specific risk assessments, an enhanced and equitable sick leave policy may help limit presenteeism and viral transmission in large workplaces.

multidisciplinary sciences
The impact of organisational characteristics of staff and facility on infectious disease outbreaks in care homes: a systematic review

A. E. M. Liljas,L. P. Morath,B. Burström,P. Schön,J. Agerholm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07481-w

2022-03-15

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:Abstract Background Infectious disease outbreaks are common in care homes, often with substantial impact on the rates of infection and mortality of the residents, who primarily are older people vulnerable to infections. There is growing evidence that organisational characteristics of staff and facility might play a role in infectious disease outbreaks however such evidence have not previously been systematically reviewed. Therefore, this systematic review aims to examine the impact of facility and staff characteristics on the risk of infectious disease outbreaks in care homes. Methods Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, ProQuest, Web of Science, CINAHL) were searched. Studies considered for inclusion were of any design reporting on an outbreak of any infectious disease in one or more care homes providing care for primarily older people with original data on: facility size, facility location (urban/rural), facility design, use of temporary hired staff, staff compartmentalizing, residence of staff, and/or nursing aides hours per resident. Retrieved studies were screened, assessed for quality using CASP, and analysed employing a narrative synthesis. Results Sixteen studies (8 cohort studies, 6 cross-sectional studies, 2 case-control) were included from the search which generated 10,424 unique records. COVID-19 was the most commonly reported cause of outbreak ( n = 11). The other studies focused on influenza, respiratory and gastrointestinal outbreaks. Most studies reported on the impact of facility size (n = 11) followed by facility design ( n = 4), use of temporary hired staff ( n = 3), facility location ( n = 2), staff compartmentalizing (n = 2), nurse aides hours (n = 2) and residence of staff (n = 1). Findings suggest that urban location and larger facility size may be associated with greater risks of an infectious disease outbreak. Additionally, the risk of a larger outbreak seems lower in larger facilities. Whilst staff compartmentalizing may be associated with lower risk of an outbreak, staff residing in highly infected areas may be associated with greater risk of outbreak. The influence of facility design, use of temporary staff, and nurse aides hours remains unclear. Conclusions This systematic review suggests that larger facilities have greater risks of infectious disease outbreaks, yet the risk of a larger outbreak seems lower in larger facilities. Due to lack of robust findings the impact of facility and staff characteristics on infectious disease outbreaks remain largely unknown. Prospero CRD42020213585 .

health care sciences & services
Unravelling the modes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during a nursing home outbreak: looking beyond the church super-spread event

Helene ACM Voeten,Reina S Sikkema,Marjolein Damen,Bas B Oude Munnink,Carla Arends,Ellen Stobberingh,Ellen Hoogervorst,Marion P.G. Koopmans,Ewout Fanoy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-63027/v1

2020-09-09

Abstract:Abstract BackgroundAn outbreak of COVID-19 in a nursing home in the Netherlands, following an on-site church service held on March 8, 2020, triggered an investigation to unravel sources and chain(s) of transmission.MethodsEpidemiological data were collected from registries and through a questionnaire among church visitors. Symptomatic residents and healthcare workers (HCWs) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). Sequences from a selection of people from the same area were included as community reference.ResultsAfter the church service, 30 of 39 visitors (77%) developed symptoms; 14 were tested and were positive for COVID-19 (11 residents and 3 non-residents). In the following five weeks, 62 of 300 residents (21%) and 30 of 640 HCWs (5%) tested positive for COVID-19; 21 of 62 residents (34%) died. The outbreak was controlled through a cascade of measures. WGS of samples from residents and HCWs identified a diversity of sequence types, grouped into eight clusters. Seven resident church visitors all were infected with distinct viruses, four of which belonged to two larger clusters in the nursing home.ConclusionsAlthough initial investigation suggested the church service as source of the outbreak, detailed analysis showed a more complex picture, most consistent with widespread regional circulation of the virus in the weeks before the outbreak, and multiple introductions into the nursing home before the visitor ban. The findings underscore the importance of careful outbreak investigations to understand SARS-CoV-2 transmission to develop evidence-based mitigation measures.
Prevention is Key to Reducing the Spread of COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities

Jingquan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S386429

2022-11-18

Infection and Drug Resistance

Abstract:Jingquan Li Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA Correspondence: Jingquan Li, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University, 148 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA, Tel +1 516-463-8823, Email The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has greatly affected the older people who live in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Older people and those with underlying chronic conditions in LTCFs have experienced disproportionately high morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 vaccines plus a booster shot provide strong protection against severe illness, hospitalizations, and deaths, but new COVID-19 variants, such as Omicron, have a remarkable ability to evade immunity from vaccines, past infection, or both. Prevention is key to reducing the spread of COVID-19 in LTCFs. This study aims to investigate a prevention approach for protecting residents and staff from COVID-19. This paper first presents a case study of massive coronavirus outbreaks at a big nursing home facility and demonstrates how the facility incorrectly responded to COVID-19. It further investigates prevention measures, such as improving vaccination, early detection, isolation and intervention to prevent the spread of COVID-19. It concludes by discussing the implications of the study and directions of future research. Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, long-term care facilities, prevention, vaccination, early detection, early isolation The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has greatly affected the older people who live in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) all over the world. 1 In the United States, more than 1.3 million old people live in 15,600 LTCFs. From May 2020 through January 2021, 94% of LTCFs experienced more than one COVID-19 outbreaks and 85% of the LTCFs had an outbreak lasting 5 or more weeks. 2 COVID-19 vaccines plus a booster shot provide strong protection against severe illness, hospitalizations, and deaths, but new COVID-19 variants, such as Omicron, have a remarkable ability to evade immunity from vaccines, past infection, or both. 3 As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, prevention is key to protecting LTCF residents and staff from COVID-19. LTCFs are high-risk settings for outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2. Residents in LTCFs are usually older people with chronic diseases and impairments. 4,5 Older age and the presence of comorbidities are associated with increased risk of mortality in the COVID-19 pandemic. 6 Older people living in crowded, congregate settings are at high risk of being infected by highly transmissible coronavirus. 7 When residents live in close rooms with one another, it is difficult to move or quarantine residents once they are infected. 4 Likewise, health care workers who are infected or who do not consistently wash their hands move from room to room assisting residents and thereby spread the virus. Making the risk worse, many workers do not have paid sick leave, so they may continue to work even while they are sick. 4 In addition, staffing shortages and staff turnover, high resident-to-staff ratios, supply shortages, and inadequate infection prevention and control (IPC) measures are well documented in the LTCF settings, but solutions are still unclear. 8 The coronavirus is highly contagious and spreads between people through direct and contact transmission. The symptomatic phase manifests with fever, tiredness, cough and myalgia to severe respiratory failure. 9 Management of COVID-19 is mainly by antiviral and monoclonal antibody therapy along with mechanical ventilation in severe cases. 9–11 Prevention and early intervention is key to protecting LTCF residents and staff from COVID-19. While the vulnerability of living with chronic diseases and impairments and the need for COVID-19 preparedness, coordination and monitoring in LTCFs are well recognized by prior research, 4,6–8 the literature on prevention strategies is quite limited. This study aims to investigate a prevention approach for protecting residents and staff from COVID-19. This paper first presents a case study of massive COVID-19 outbreaks at a New Jersey nursing home and identifies epidemiological deficiencies of its IPC measures. It then investigates a prevention approach to reduce the spread of coronavirus in LTCFs. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the study and directions of future research. Woodland Behavioral and Nursing Center, previously known as Andover Subacute and Rehabilitation Center, is a long-term care facility located in Sussex County, New Jersey. The facility has 543 beds and 475 staff mem -Abstract Truncated-

pharmacology & pharmacy,infectious diseases
COVID-19 Transmission in a Psychiatric Long-Term Care Rehabilitation Facility: An Observational Study

Glen L Xiong,Alec Atkin,Kelly Moquin,MarieChristi Candido,Peter Beilenson,Olivia Kasirye,Michael Wasserman,Patricia Blum,Donald Hilty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.20m02765

2020-11-05

Abstract:Objective: To report the clinical characteristics and transmission rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a community inpatient long-term care psychiatric rehabilitation facility designed for persons with serious mental illness to provide insight into transmission and symptom patterns and emerging testing protocols, as well as medical complications and prognosis. Methods: This study examined a cohort of 54 residents of a long-term care psychiatric rehabilitation program from March to April 2020. Baseline demographics, clinical diagnoses, and vital signs were examined to look for statistical differences between positive versus negative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) groups. During the early phase of the pandemic, the facility closely followed the local shelter-in-place order (starting March 19, 2020) and symptom-based testing. Results: Of the residents, the primary psychiatric diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder: 28 (51.9%), schizophrenia: 21 (38.9%), bipolar I disorder: 3 (5.5%), and unspecified psychotic disorder: 2 (3.7%). Forty (74%) of 54 residents tested positive for SARS-COV-2, with a doubling time of 3.9 days. There were no statistical differences between the positive SARS-COV-2 versus negative groups for age or race/ethnicity. Psychiatric and medical conditions were not significantly associated with contracting SARS-COV-2, with the exception of obesity (n = 17 [43%] positive vs n = 12 [86%] negative, P = .01). Medical monitoring of vital signs and symptoms did not lead to earlier detection. All of the residents completely recovered, with the last resident no longer showing any symptoms 24 days from the index case. Conclusion: Research is needed to determine optimal strategies for long-term care mental health settings that incorporate frequent testing and personal protective equipment use to prevent rapid transmission of SARS-COV-2.
Association between delayed outbreak identification and SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality among long-term care home residents, Ontario, Canada, March to November 2020: a cohort study

Kevin A Brown,Sarah A Buchan,Adrienne K Chan,Andrew Costa,Nick Daneman,Gary Garber,Michael Hillmer,Aaron Jones,James M Johnson,Dylan Kain,Kamil Malikov,Richard G Mather,Allison McGeer,Kevin L Schwartz,Nathan M Stall and Jennie Johnstone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2024.29.41.2300719

2024-10-12

Eurosurveillance

Abstract:Background Late outbreak identification is a common risk factor mentioned in case reports of large respiratory infection outbreaks in long-term care (LTC) homes. Aim To systematically measure the association between late SARS-CoV-2 outbreak identification and secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality in residents of LTC homes. Methods We studied SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks across LTC homes in Ontario, Canada from March to November 2020, before the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Our exposure (late outbreak identification) was based on cumulative infection pressure (the number of infectious resident-days) on the outbreak identification date (early: ≤ 2 infectious resident-days, late: ≥ 3 infectious resident-days), where the infectious window was −2 to +8 days around onset. Our outcome consisted of 30-day incidence of secondary infection and mortality, based on the proportion of at-risk residents with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with onset within 30 days of the outbreak identification date. Results We identified 632 SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks across 623 LTC homes. Of these, 36.4% (230/632) outbreaks were identified late. Outbreaks identified late had more secondary infections (10.3%; 4,437/42,953) and higher mortality (3.2%; 1,374/42,953) compared with outbreaks identified early (infections: 3.3%; 2,015/61,714; p < 0.001, mortality: 0.9%; 579/61,714; p < 0.001). After adjustment for 12 LTC home covariates, the incidence of secondary infections in outbreaks identified late was 2.90-fold larger than that of outbreaks identified early (OR: 2.90; 95% CI: 2.04–4.13). Conclusions The timeliness of outbreak identification could be used to predict the trajectory of an outbreak, plan outbreak measures and retrospectively provide feedback for quality improvement, with the objective of reducing the impacts of respiratory infections in LTC home residents.

infectious diseases
Off-season RSV epidemics in Australia after easing of COVID-19 restrictions

John-Sebastian Eden,Chisha Sikazwe,Ruopeng Xie,Yi-Mo Deng,Sheena G. Sullivan,Alice Michie,Avram Levy,Elena Cutmore,Christopher C. Blyth,Philip N. Britton,Nigel Crawford,Xiaomin Dong,Dominic E. Dwyer,Kimberly M. Edwards,Bethany A. Horsburgh,David Foley,Karina Kennedy,Cara Minney-Smith,David Speers,Rachel L. Tulloch,Edward C. Holmes,Vijaykrishna Dhanasekaran,David W. Smith,Jen Kok,Ian G. Barr,Annette Alafaci,Ian Carter,Andrew Daley,Michelle Francis,Alison Kesson,Hannah Moore,Christine Ngo,Tyna Tran,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30485-3

IF: 16.6

2022-05-24

Nature Communications

Abstract:Abstract Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of acute respiratory infection with the most severe disease in the young and elderly. Non-pharmaceutical interventions and travel restrictions for controlling COVID-19 have impacted the circulation of most respiratory viruses including RSV globally, particularly in Australia, where during 2020 the normal winter epidemics were notably absent. However, in late 2020, unprecedented widespread RSV outbreaks occurred, beginning in spring, and extending into summer across two widely separated regions of the Australian continent, New South Wales (NSW) and Australian Capital Territory (ACT) in the east, and Western Australia. Through genomic sequencing we reveal a major reduction in RSV genetic diversity following COVID-19 emergence with two genetically distinct RSV-A clades circulating cryptically, likely localised for several months prior to an epidemic surge in cases upon relaxation of COVID-19 control measures. The NSW/ACT clade subsequently spread to the neighbouring state of Victoria and to cause extensive outbreaks and hospitalisations in early 2021. These findings highlight the need for continued surveillance and sequencing of RSV and other respiratory viruses during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, as mitigation measures may disrupt seasonal patterns, causing larger or more severe outbreaks.

multidisciplinary sciences

Clonal plants: beyond the patterns—ecological and evolutionary dynamics of asexual reproduction

Nursing home staff networks and COVID-19

COVID-19 outbreaks in residential aged care facilities: an agent-based modeling study

A severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nosocomial cluster with inter-facility spread: Lessons learned

Severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nosocomial transmission dynamics, a retrospective cohort study of two healthcare-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clusters in a district hospital in England during March and April 2020

Integrated Genomic and Social Network Analyses of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Transmission in the Healthcare Setting

Social Distancing and Isolation Strategies to Prevent and Control the Transmission of COVID-19 and Other Infectious Diseases in Care Homes for Older People: An International Review

A model-based assessment of social isolation practices for COVID-19 outbreak response in residential care facilities

Preventing the transmission of COVID-19 and other coronaviruses in older adults aged 60 years and above living in long-term care: a rapid review

Unraveling the Modes of Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) During a Nursing Home Outbreak: Looking Beyond the Church Superspreading Event

National Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on the Mental Health of Australian Residential Aged Care Residents and Staff

Public health rapid response in managing COVID-19 outbreaks in residential aged care facilities: a regional public health unit perspective

Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in congregate living settings: a multicenter prospective study

A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak investigation at a storage and distribution centre in England: an assessment of worker- and workplace-related risk factors

The impact of organisational characteristics of staff and facility on infectious disease outbreaks in care homes: a systematic review

Unravelling the modes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during a nursing home outbreak: looking beyond the church super-spread event

Prevention is Key to Reducing the Spread of COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities

COVID-19 Transmission in a Psychiatric Long-Term Care Rehabilitation Facility: An Observational Study

Association between delayed outbreak identification and SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality among long-term care home residents, Ontario, Canada, March to November 2020: a cohort study

Off-season RSV epidemics in Australia after easing of COVID-19 restrictions