Hypoechoic rim of fetal heart.

P. Jeanty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1991.10.3.140
1991-03-01
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Abstract:To tlie Ed!tor:-Dr. Brown and coworkers have recently pre· sented convincing evidence that the echoes arising from the free ventricular wall are in continuity with the echoes that constitute the interventricular septum.1 ln other words, their study has shown the continuity of the myocardium that composes the free walls and the interventricular septum. This finding is in accordance with reports as ancient as those of Hippocrates. In their study the authors called the myocardium a "hy· poechoic rim around the cardiac ventricles· and suggest that it represents the same finding that we described •n a previous study. We appreciate their help in identifying myocardium from othe1 structures. We had indeed considered this as a potential etiology for our finding when we wrote the initial paper. Although it might not have been clear to some au· thors ? ~ what we describe is a thin hypoechoic rim pcri11/1cral to the myocardium. Since our original study, we continue to observe this thin peripheral hypoechoic rim (Fig. 1). We would be delighted to see the authors comment on their visualization of the rim we described, not on something as clearly identifiable as the myocardium. To conclude, we appreciate Dr. Brown and coworkers' reminder that the myocardium of the free wall and of the interventricular septum is continuous. Further, we agree with them that observing the myocardium is normal. We stand by our initial observation that a thin hypoechoic rim peripheral to the myocardium is occasionally seen (Fig. 1) and that it is a benign finding that should not be conCused with a pericar· dial effusion. Our dissections of specimens only show two potential sources for this finding: pericardia! fluid and pericardia! fat. Fat, however, is not a constant feature in fetuses, uncommonly appears hypoechok, and would not be expected to change during the cardiac cycle. In the absence of a better explanation, we persist in thinking that this rim represents a 11 iver of physiologic pericardia! fluid, but we are open to any suggestions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?