An automated comparative analysis of the exudative biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, The RAP Study: Report 6
Bilal Haj Najeeb,Bianca S Gerendas,Gabor G Deak,Oliver Leingang,Hrvoje Bogunovic,Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth,Bianca S. Gerendas,Gabor G. Deak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.02.018
IF: 5.488
2024-02-01
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:PURPOSE: To investigate differences in volume and distribution of the main exudative biomarkers across all types and subtypes of macular neovascularization (MNV) using artificial intelligence (AI).DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.METHODS: An AI-based analysis was conducted on 34,528 OCT B-scans consisting of 281 (250 unifocal, 31 multifocal) MNV3, 55 MNV2, and 121 (30 polypoidal, 91 non-polypoidal) MNV1 treatment-naive eyes. Means (SDs), medians and heat maps of cystic intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachments (PED), and hyperreflective foci (HRF) volumes, as well as retinal thickness (RT) were compared among MNV types and subtypes.RESULTS: MNV3 had the highest mean IRF with 291 (290) nL, RT with 357 (49) µm, and HRF with 80 (70) nL, P ≤ .05. MNV1 showed the greatest mean SRF with 492 (586) nL, whereas MNV3 exhibited the lowest with 218 (382) nL, P ≤ .05. Heat maps showed IRF confined to the center, whereas SRF was scattered in all types. SRF, HRF, and PED were more distributed in the temporal macular half in MNV3. Means of IRF, HRF, and PED were higher in the multifocal than in the unifocal MNV3 with 416 (309) nL,114 (95) nL, and 810 (850) nL, P ≤ .05. Compared to the non-polypoidal subtype, the polypoidal subtype had greater means of SRF with 695 (718) nL, HRF 69 (63) nL, RT 357 (45) µm, and PED 1115 (1170) nL, P ≤ .05.CONCLUSIONS: This novel quantitative AI analysis shows that SRF is a biomarker of choroidal origin in MNV1, whereas IRF, HRF, and RT are retinal biomarkers in MNV3. Polypoidal MNV1 and multifocal MNV3 present with higher exudation compared to other subtypes.
ophthalmology