Abstract:Abstract Context This narrative review article explores research integrity and the implications of scholarly work in medical education. The paper describes how the current landscape of medical education emphasizes research and scholarly activity for medical students, resident physicians, and faculty physician educators. There is a gap in the existing literature that fully explores research integrity, the challenges surrounding the significant pressure to perform scholarly activity, and the potential for ethical lapses by those involved in medical education. Objectives The objectives of this review article are to provide a background on authorship and publication safeguards, outline common types of research misconduct, describe the implications of publication in medical education, discuss the consequences of ethical breaches, and outline possible solutions to promote research integrity in academic medicine. Methods To complete this narrative review, the authors explored the current literature utilizing multiple databases beginning in June of 2021, and they completed the literature review in January of 2023. To capture the wide scope of the review, numerous searches were performed. A number of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were utilized to identify relevant articles. The MeSH terms included “scientific misconduct,” “research misconduct,” “authorship,” “plagiarism,” “biomedical research/ethics,” “faculty, medical,” “fellowships and scholarships,” and “internship and residency.” Additional references were accessed to include medical school and residency accreditation standards, residency match statistics, regulatory guidelines, and standard definitions. Results Within the realm of academic medicine, research misconduct and misrepresentation continue to occur without clear solutions. There is a wide range of severity in breaches of research integrity, ranging from minor infractions to fraud. Throughout the medical education system in the United States, there is pressure to publish research and scholarly work. Higher rates of publications are associated with a successful residency match for students and academic promotion for faculty physicians. For those who participate in research misconduct, there is a multitude of potential adverse consequences. Potential solutions to ensure research integrity exist but are not without barriers to implementation. Conclusions Pressure in the world of academic medicine to publish contributes to the potential for research misconduct and authorship misrepresentation. Lapses in research integrity can result in a wide range of potentially adverse consequences for the offender, their institution, the scientific community, and the public. If adopted, universal research integrity policies and procedures could make major strides in eliminating research misconduct in the realm of academic medicine.

Scientific integrity and fraud in radiology research

Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct

Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Research Integrity definitions and challenges

A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences

A retrospective analysis based on the investigation and handling results of 310 medical research integrity cases

[Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research]

Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Physician Authors of ACR Appropriateness Criteria

Exploring COVID-19 research credibility among Spanish scientists

Scientific misconduct: Plagiarism and non-compliance with disclosure of interest: Retrospective analysis of 1 year's submissions to Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases

Scientific fraud: attack on the credibility of science

Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe

Post‐publication research integrity concerns in randomized clinical trials: A scoping review of the literature

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

Productivity Patterns, Collaboration and Scientific Careers of Authors with Retracted Publications in Clinical Medicine

Two Decades of Scientific Misconduct in India: Retraction Reasons and Journal Quality among Inter-country and Intra-country Institutional Collaboration

Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology

Unsolicited scam invitations from predatory publications and fraudulent conferences: Radiology-in-training experience

Safeguarding Scientific Integrity: Examining Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review Process

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

Risk of bias and problematic trials: characterising the research integrity of trials submitted to Anaesthesia