Abstract:Objective Different methods can be used to condition imaging systems for clinical use. The purpose of this study was to assess how these methods complement one another in evaluating a system for clinical integration of an emerging technology, photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT), for thoracic imaging. Methods Four methods were used to assess a clinical PCCT system (NAEOTOM Alpha; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) across 3 reconstruction kernels (Br40f, Br48f, and Br56f). First, a phantom evaluation was performed using a computed tomography quality control phantom to characterize noise magnitude, spatial resolution, and detectability. Second, clinical images acquired using conventional and PCCT systems were used for a multi-institutional reader study where readers from 2 institutions were asked to rank their preference of images. Third, the clinical images were assessed in terms of in vivo image quality characterization of global noise index and detectability. Fourth, a virtual imaging trial was conducted using a validated simulation platform (DukeSim) that models PCCT and a virtual patient model (XCAT) with embedded lung lesions imaged under differing conditions of respiratory phase and positional displacement. Using known ground truth of the patient model, images were evaluated for quantitative biomarkers of lung intensity histograms and lesion morphology metrics. Results For the physical phantom study, the Br56f kernel was shown to have the highest resolution despite having the highest noise and lowest detectability. Readers across both institutions preferred the Br56f kernel (71% first rank) with a high interclass correlation (0.990). In vivo assessments found superior detectability for PCCT compared with conventional computed tomography but higher noise and reduced detectability with increased kernel sharpness. For the virtual imaging trial, Br40f was shown to have the best performance for histogram measures, whereas Br56f was shown to have the most precise and accurate morphology metrics. Conclusion The 4 evaluation methods each have their strengths and limitations and bring complementary insight to the evaluation of PCCT. Although no method offers a complete answer, concordant findings between methods offer affirmatory confidence in a decision, whereas discordant ones offer insight for added perspective. Aggregating our findings, we concluded the Br56f kernel best for high-resolution tasks and Br40f for contrast-dependent tasks.

A Computer-based Analysis for Identification and Quantification of Small Airway Disease in Lung Computed Tomography Images: A Comprehensive Review for Radiologists

Visual vs. computer-based computed tomography analysis for the identification of functional patterns in interstitial lung diseases

Computed tomography-identified phenotypes of small airway obstructions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Towards the adoption of quantitative computed tomography in the management of interstitial lung disease

Computerized Processing and Analysis of CT Images for Developing a New Criterion in COPD Diagnosis

CT Quantification of Interstitial Lung Abnormality and Interstitial Lung Disease: From Technical Challenges to Future Directions

CT-Based Commercial Software Applications: Improving Patient Care Through Accurate COPD Subtyping

Segmentation and Image Analysis of Abnormal Lungs at CT: Current Approaches, Challenges, and Future Trends

Potential Lung Nodules Identification for Characterization by Variable Multistep Threshold and Shape Indices from CT Images

Pulmonary Hypertension in Association with Lung Disease: Quantitative CT and Artificial Intelligence to the Rescue? State-of-the-Art Review

Imaging of Small Airways Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A systematic assessment and optimization of photon‐counting CT for lung density quantifications

Technology Characterization Through Diverse Evaluation Methodologies: Application to Thoracic Imaging in Photon-Counting Computed Tomography

Correlation between quantitative multi-detector computed tomography lung analysis and pulmonary function tests in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Origins of and lessons from quantitative functional X-ray computed tomography of the lung

Lung imaging in COPD and asthma

Artificial intelligence in COPD CT images: identification, staging, and quantitation

Automated computed tomography measures predict functional decline in cystic fibrosis

State of the art review | Advances in COPD imaging using CT and MRI: Linkage with lung physiology and clinical outcomes

Computed tomography‐based artificial intelligence in lung disease—Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Assessment of artificial intelligence-aided chest computed tomography in diagnosis of chronic obstructive airway disease: an observational study