Abstract:Abstract The rapid proliferation of many different engineered nanomaterials (defined as materials designed and produced to have structural features with at least one dimension of 100 nanometers or less) presents a dilemma to regulators regarding hazard identification. The International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute convened an expert working group to develop a screening strategy for the hazard identification of engineered nanomaterials. The working group report presents the elements of a screening strategy rather than a detailed testing protocol. Based on an evaluation of the limited data currently available, the report presents a broad data gathering strategy applicable to this early stage in the development of a risk assessment process for nanomaterials. Oral, dermal, inhalation, and injection routes of exposure are included recognizing that, depending on use patterns, exposure to nanomaterials may occur by any of these routes. The three key elements of the toxicity screening strategy are: Physicochemical Characteristics, In Vitro Assays (cellular and non-cellular), and In Vivo Assays. There is a strong likelihood that biological activity of nanoparticles will depend on physicochemical parameters not routinely considered in toxicity screening studies. Physicochemical properties that may be important in understanding the toxic effects of test materials include particle size and size distribution, agglomeration state, shape, crystal structure, chemical composition, surface area, surface chemistry, surface charge, and porosity. In vitro techniques allow specific biological and mechanistic pathways to be isolated and tested under controlled conditions, in ways that are not feasible in in vivo tests. Tests are suggested for portal-of-entry toxicity for lungs, skin, and the mucosal membranes, and target organ toxicity for endothelium, blood, spleen, liver, nervous system, heart, and kidney. Non-cellular assessment of nanoparticle durability, protein interactions, complement activation, and pro-oxidant activity is also considered. Tier 1 in vivo assays are proposed for pulmonary, oral, skin and injection exposures, and Tier 2 evaluations for pulmonary exposures are also proposed. Tier 1 evaluations include markers of inflammation, oxidant stress, and cell proliferation in portal-of-entry and selected remote organs and tissues. Tier 2 evaluations for pulmonary exposures could include deposition, translocation, and toxicokinetics and biopersistence studies; effects of multiple exposures; potential effects on the reproductive system, placenta, and fetus; alternative animal models; and mechanistic studies.

Consensus on the Key Characteristics of Immunotoxic Agents as a Basis for Hazard Identification

Immunotoxicant screening and prioritization in the twenty-first century

New approach methodologies to enhance human health risk assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals — a PARC (Partnership for the Assessment of Risk from Chemicals) project

Immunotoxicity of nanomaterials in health and disease: Current challenges and emerging approaches for identifying immune modifiers in susceptible populations

Challenges and gaps in immunosafety evaluation of therapeutics: An IQ DruSafe survey

Relative sensitivities of TDAR, cytokine production, and immunophenotyping assays in immunotoxicity assessment

Consideration of pathways for immunotoxicity of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)

Experiences with an advanced screening procedure for the identification of chemicals with an immunotoxic potential in routine toxicology

Development of the ICH Guidelines for Immunotoxicology Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals Using a Survey of Industry Practices

In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs

Recent advances in immunotoxicity and its impact on human health: causative agents, effects and existing treatments

Systematic Review of Multi-Omics Approaches to Investigate Toxicological Effects in Macrophages

Application and interpretation of immunophenotyping data in safety and risk assessment

Immunotoxicity in Vitro Assays for Environmental Pollutants under Paradigm Shift in Toxicity Tests

Key characteristics of carcinogens meet hallmarks for prevention-cutting the Gordian knot

Re-thinking the current paradigm for clinical immunogenicity assessment: an update from the discussion in the European Bioanalysis Forum

Consensus report on the future of animal-free systemic toxicity testing

Consensus on the key characteristics of metabolism disruptors

Application of the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens to Bisphenol A

Skin sensitizers in cosmetics and beyond: potential multiple mechanisms of action and importance of T-cell assays for in vitro screening

Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy