Abstract:Model validation is the most important part of building a supervised model. For building a model with good generalization performance one must have a sensible data splitting strategy, and this is crucial for model validation. In this study, we conducted a comparative study on various reported data splitting methods. The MixSim model was employed to generate nine simulated datasets with different probabilities of mis-classification and variable sample sizes. Then partial least squares for discriminant analysis and support vector machines for classification were applied to these datasets. Data splitting methods tested included variants of cross-validation, bootstrapping, bootstrapped Latin partition, Kennard-Stone algorithm (K-S) and sample set partitioning based on joint X–Y distances algorithm (SPXY). These methods were employed to split the data into training and validation sets. The estimated generalization performances from the validation sets were then compared with the ones obtained from the blind test sets which were generated from the same distribution but were unseen by the training/validation procedure used in model construction. The results showed that the size of the data is the deciding factor for the qualities of the generalization performance estimated from the validation set. We found that there was a significant gap between the performance estimated from the validation set and the one from the test set for the all the data splitting methods employed on small datasets. Such disparity decreased when more samples were available for training/validation, and this is because the models were then moving towards approximations of the central limit theory for the simulated datasets used. We also found that having too many or too few samples in the training set had a negative effect on the estimated model performance, suggesting that it is necessary to have a good balance between the sizes of training set and validation set to have a reliable estimation of model performance. We also found that systematic sampling method such as K-S and SPXY generally had very poor estimation of the model performance, most likely due to the fact that they are designed to take the most representative samples first and thus left a rather poorly representative sample set for model performance estimation.

Performance-Estimation Properties of Cross-Validation-Based Protocols with Simultaneous Hyper-Parameter Optimization

Cross-validatory Framework for Optimal Parameter Estimation of KPCA and KPLS Models

Bootstrapping the Out-of-sample Predictions for Efficient and Accurate Cross-Validation

Is Cross-Validation the Gold Standard to Evaluate Model Performance?

Bootstrapping the Cross-Validation Estimate

On The Smoothness of Cross-Validation-Based Estimators Of Classifier Performance

On the Asymptotic Optimality of Cross-Validation based Hyper-parameter Estimators for Regularized Least Squares Regression Problems

Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?

Evaluation of Performance Measures for SVR Hyperparameter Selection

A comparison of hyperparameter tuning procedures for clinical prediction models: A simulation study

Cross-Validated Off-Policy Evaluation

Batch Effect Confounding Leads to Strong Bias in Performance Estimates Obtained by Cross-Validation

Fast Cross-Validation via Sequential Testing

Empirical Performance of Cross-Validation With Oracle Methods in a Genomics Context

Simple, fast and accurate hyper-parameter tuning in Gaussian-kernel SVM

On Splitting Training and Validation Set: A Comparative Study of Cross-Validation, Bootstrap and Systematic Sampling for Estimating the Generalization Performance of Supervised Learning

Iterative Approximate Cross-Validation

Penalized Regression Methods With Modified Cross‐Validation and Bootstrap Tuning Produce Better Prediction Models

Greed Is Good: Rapid Hyperparameter Optimization and Model Selection Using Greedy k-Fold Cross Validation

Stability-Adjusted Cross-Validation for Sparse Linear Regression

Efficient, adaptive cross-validation for tuning and comparing models, with application to drug discovery