Insects visit pseudoflowers on the host (Xyridaceae) and carry fungal DNA on their bodies
Terry J. Torres-Cruz,Tristan M. Cofer,Laura M. Kaminsky,Lauren A. Ré,Jack R. Johnson,Alexis Vaughn,James H. Tumlinson,Imane Laraba,Robert H. Proctor,Hye-Seon Kim,Terrence H. Bell,M. Catherine Aime,Michael J. Skvarla,David M. Geiser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.05.583517
2024-03-08
Abstract:The fungus produces flower-like structures (i.e., pseudoflowers) that were recently discovered on yellow-eyed grasses ( spp.) in Guyana. It is unknown whether these pseudoflowers, which are composed entirely of fungal tissue, are true mimics that attract insects as a means of fungal dispersal. We evaluated the potential of to affect insect visitation patterns to flowers and pseudoflowers by 1) documenting insect visitation to in Guyana, 2) measuring the presence of DNA on insects, and 3) evaluating fluorescence and volatile production on flowers and pseudoflowers. We report for the first time Vespidae, Formicidae, Salticidae, Acrididae, and Tetrigidae visiting . Diverse insects, including Conocephalini spp. (meadow katydids; Tettigoniidae), spp. (carpenter ants; Formicidae), and a Geometridae sp. (geometer moths) were found to visit flowers and pseudoflowers. DNA was detected on 3/12 (25%) of captured insect bodies using conventional and quantitative PCR. Volatiles produced in the field by pseudoflowers and flowers were similar, except for the presence of a sesquiterpene, putatively identified here as α-gurjunene, which was detected both in pure cultures and field-collected pseudoflower samples, but not from flowers. The production of this sesquiterpene by and the fluorescence of peduncles represent potential signals involved in insect attraction for this system. These observations, along with the overlap in insect visitors of flowers and pseudoflowers and the detection of DNA on insect bodies, are consistent with insect visitors being vectors of pollen and propagules between host plants.
Ecology