Abstract:Background Differentiating between acute chest pain of cardiac versus non-cardiac origin poses a diagnostic challenge. Risk stratification tools, such as the HEART (History, ECG, Age, Risk and Troponin) score, have been developed to aid in decision-making. These scores typically rely on troponin or electrocardiography (ECG), often unavailable in (low-resource) community-based healthcare settings. Purpose We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the HEART score in a low-risk setting when one of its five metrics is missing Methods We relied on data from two cohorts, OUT-ACS (n=1,711; for analyses with and without troponin) and TRACE (n=664; for analyses without troponin) of consecutive patients evaluated at primary care emergency clinics in respectively Norway (2016-2018; 47.7% female, median age: 56, 25th-75th percentiles:45-68) and the Netherlands (2017, 56.9% female, median age: 48, 25th-75th percentiles:32-67). We evaluated the HEAR score (all elements except troponin) and the HART score (all elements except ECG). The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance for ruling out myocardial infarction (MI) at index presentation, with a secondary outcome consisting of the composite of all-cause death or MI at 90-day follow-up. Results Among study participants, 61 (3.6%) were diagnosed with an MI in the OUT-ACS and 20 (3.0%) in the TRACE cohort. The percentages of patients deemed at low risk by HEAR (<=3) were 925 (54.1%) and 527 (79.4%) in OUT-ACS and TRACE, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 70.5% (95 % confidence interval 57.4-81.5) and 55.0% (52.5-57.4), and 75.0% (50.9-91.3) and 81.1% (77.8-84.0) for HEAR in the two respective cohorts. For the HART score, low risk was found in 696 (40.7%) OUT-ACS participants, with a respective sensitivity and specificity of 96.7% (88.7-99.6) and 42.1% (39.7-44.5), Positive predictive values ranged from 5.5-15.3%, whilst negative predictive values were 98.1-99.1% for HEAR and 99.7% for HART. By comparison, the HEART score determined 639 (37.3%) patients as low risk, had a sensitivity and specificity of 98.4% (91.2-100) and 38.7% (36.3-41.1), and positive and negative predictive values of 5.6% (5.3-5.9) and 99.8% (98.9-100). Similar findings were found for analyses using the secondary outcome. Conclusion HEART score variants in which troponin or ECG are omitted have higher efficiency but at the cost of decreased safety, particularly when leaving out troponin. Therefore, these biomarkers are paramount for adequate safety, despite the overall high negative predictive values in this low-prevalence primary care setting.

Risk-standardized mortality metric to monitor hospital performance for chest pain presentations

Risk-adjusted management in catheterization procedures for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A standard operating procedure pilot study

Use of cumulative mortality data in patients with acute myocardial infarction for early detection of variation in clinical practice: observational study

The Respiratory Rate, Age, and Mean Arterial Pressure (RAM) Index: A Novel Prognostic Tool to Predict Mortality among Adult Patients with Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department

Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in China.

Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports.

Improvement of Emergency Department Chest Pain Evaluation Using Hs-cTnT and a Risk Stratification Pathway

Change in Hospital Risk-standardized Stroke Mortality Performance With and Without the Passive Surveillance Stroke Severity Score

Safety and efficiency of modified HEART scores without troponin or electrocardiography: an analysis based on two European out-of-hours primary care cohorts

Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting

Association of physiological stress markers at the emergency department to readmission and death within 90 days: a prospective observational study

The HEARTRISK6 Scale: Predicting Short-Term Serious Outcomes in Emergency Department Acute Heart Failure Patients

Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain

Application Value of NLR, PLR, LMR, HEART score, and POCT in Early Warning and Accurate Graded Diagnosis of High-Risk Chest Pain in Emergency Medicine

Implementation and clinical utility of a Computer-Aided Risk Score for Mortality (CARM): a qualitative study

Prediction of Short-Term Mortality in Acute Heart Failure Patients Using Minimal Electronic Health Record Data

Use of downstream stress imaging tests for risk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and low HEART score

A Novel Broadly Applicable Risk Score for Predicting Mortality of Patients with Circulatory System Diseases Within Hospitalization Duration

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Riskometer Scales in Predicting the Risk of in-Hospital Mortality in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Prehospital stratification in acute chest pain patient into high risk and low risk by emergency medical service: a prospective cohort study

Evaluating the performance of the HEART score in a Tanzanian emergency department