Critical Analysis of Cytoplasmic Progression of Inflammatory Signaling Suggests Potential Pharmacologic Targets for Wound Healing and Fibrotic Disorders
Michael L. Samulevich,Liam E. Carman,Brian J. Aneskievich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122723
IF: 4.757
2024-11-30
Biomedicines
Abstract:Successful skin wound healing is dependent on an interplay between epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts as they react to local extracellular factors (DAMPs, PAMPs, cytokines, etc.) surveyed from that environment by numerous membrane receptors (e.g., TLRs, cytokine receptors, etc.). In turn, those receptors are the start of a cytoplasmic signaling pathway where balance is key to effective healing and, as needed, cell and matrix regeneration. When directed through NF-κB, these signaling routes lead to transient responses to the benefit of initiating immune cell recruitment, cell replication, local chemokine and cytokine production, and matrix protein synthesis. The converse can also occur, where ongoing canonical NF-κB activation leads to chronic, hyper-responsive states. Here, we assess three key players, TAK1, TNFAIP3, and TNIP1, in cytoplasmic regulation of NF-κB activation, which, because of their distinctive and yet inter-related functions, either promote or limit that activation. Their balanced function is integral to successful wound healing, given their significant control over the expression of inflammation-, fibrosis-, and matrix remodeling-associated genes. Intriguingly, these three proteins have also been emphasized in dysregulated NF-κB signaling central to systemic sclerosis (SSc). Notably, diffuse SSc shares some tissue features similar to an excessive inflammatory/fibrotic wound response without eventual resolution. Taking a cue from certain instances of aberrant wound healing and SSc having some shared aspects, e.g., chronic inflammation and fibrosis, this review looks for the first time, to our knowledge, at what those pathologies might have in common regarding the cytoplasmic progression of NF-κB-mediated signaling. Additionally, while TAK1, TNFAIP3, and TNIP1 are often investigated and reported on individually, we propose them here as three proteins whose consequences of function are very highly interconnected at the signaling focus of NF-κB. We thus highlight the emerging promise for the eventual clinical benefit derived from an improved understanding of these integral signal progression modulators. Depending on the protein, its indirect or direct pharmacological regulation has been reported. Current findings support further intensive studies of these points in NF-κB regulation both for their basic function in healthy cells as well as with the goal of targeting them for translational benefit in multiple cutaneous wound healing situations, whether stemming from acute injury or a dysregulated inflammatory/fibrotic response.
biochemistry & molecular biology,medicine, research & experimental,pharmacology & pharmacy