Surgical Advances During the War

W. Ogilvie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-85-06-01

1945-12-01

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps

Abstract:IF. we look in retrospect over the six years of war, we cannot help being impressed by the progress that has been made in war surgery. So great is the change between then and now, that we are apt to assume that it is all surgical and all advance. In order to assess fairly where We ~tand, we must recognize that there are three aspects to the matter: advances in acc,essory methods that help surgery, real and permanent advances in surgical technique,and improvements due to altered conditions of warfare. Of these the first is the most important. The excellent results of surgery in this war compared to those in any previous war are lPldoubtedly . due in part to the fact that the modern soldier is first-class human material, and that his fitness ~s maintained up to and during battle and preserved from the time of injury to the time he reaches the ~urgeon by the services that train, clothe, feed, house and transport him. It would be impossible to overstate1:h,ejvalue to the surgical.services of modem transport, from the ubiquitous Jeep, that mechanized niule that can go anywhere that man or animal can go to pick up and bring back wounded, to ,the Dakota that has worked ' from strips laid down a few hours after the battle has passed on andhas~bolished time and distance. Modern transport has served to get surgical units right forward, to move them as the line moved, to keep them supplied at all times; it has brought the wounded rapidly and smoothly to the advanced operating centres and away again to centres of definitive surgery and the more specialized units; in short; it has allowed surgery t6 be done as the needs of the wounded demanded rather than as the exigencies of war allowed. The aims of war surgery, stated in the broadest possible tertns, are to save life" to prevent suffering and to preserve function, and the chief causes of death, dolour and disablement' are,hremorrhage, shock and ·infection. .' . . Of the medical advances that have contributed to surgical progress, the most outstanding is undoubtedly resuscitation as practised by the Army Blood Transfusion Service. This. service, which, as a separate organization, is peculiar to the British Army, has enabled surgeons to operate, to operate without nervous haste, and to operate successfully, on men with