A Multimodal Approach to Congestion Assessment
Silvia Crespo-Aznarez,Amelia Campos-Saenz de Santamaría,Marta Sánchez-Marteles,Claudia Josa-Laorden,Fernando Ruiz-Laiglesia,Beatriz Amores-Arriaga,Vanesa Garcés-Horna,Ruben Tejel-Puisac,María Angel Julián-Ansón,Ignacio Giménez-López,Juan Ignacio Pérez-Calvo,Jorge Rubio-Gracia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041053
IF: 3.9
2024-02-13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: Congestion is an essential issue in patients with heart failure (HF). Standard treatments do not usually achieve decongestion, and various strategies have been proposed to guide treatment, such as determination of natriuresis. After starting treatment with loop diuretics, we postulate that initial natriuresis might help treatment titration, decongestion, and improve prognosis. Methods: It was a prospective and observational study. Patients admitted with the diagnosis of HF decompensation were eligible. An assessment of congestion was performed during the first 48 h. Results: A total of 113 patients were included. A poor diuretic response was observed in 39.8%. After the first 48 h, patients with a greater diuretic response on admission (NaU > 80 mmol/L) showed fewer pulmonary b lines (12 vs. 15; p = 0.084), a lower IVC diameter (18 mm vs. 22 mm; p = 0.009), and lower IAP figures (11 mmHg vs. 13 mmHg; p = 0.041). Survival analysis tests demonstrated significant differences showing a higher proportion of all-cause mortality (ACM) and HF rehospitalization in the poor-diuretic-response group (log-rank test = 0.020). Conclusions: Up to 40% of the patients presented a poorer diuretic response at baseline, translating into worse outcomes. Patients with an optimal diuretic response showed significantly higher abdominal decongestion at 48 h and a better prognosis regarding ACM and/or HF rehospitalizations.
medicine, general & internal