Acetic acid as an effective mucolytic in magnification with chromoendoscopy for pit patterns analysis

K. Fu,S. Kato,T. Fujii,A. Parra-Blanco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-966873

2007-10-01

Endoscopy

Abstract:We have read the article of Togashi et al. with great interest [1]. They have com− pared the accuracy of predicting polyp histology at magnification colonoscopy using acetic acid and indigo carmine, ei− ther alone or in combination. They have shown that use of acetic acid spray in− stantly improves the pit pattern image during magnification chromoendoscopy and has high accuracy in the histological prediction of colorectal polyps. They state that acetic acid is particularly effective because it rapidly removes the mucus that can make pit pattern analysis diffi− cult, and the aceto−white reaction accen− tuates the pit pattern. However, they have shown that acetic acid increases the accu− racy more for adenomas (76 % ± 94%) than for hyperplastic polyps (92 %± 100 %). Generally, hyperplastic polyps are found as diminutive sessile polyps especially in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Endoscop− ically, hyperplastic polyps rather than adenomas correspond to sessile, pale polyps with a smooth surface and a par− tial or complete surface covering of mu− cus. Therefore, if acetic acid is an effective mucolytic, as expected by the authors, it should improve the diagnostic accuracy for hyperplastic polyps rather than for adenomas. Furthermore, the authors have shown that acetic acid alone (95 %) achieves higher accuracy overall than indigo car− mine alone (83%), although this differ− ence did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to the small sample size. We conducted a prospective study to clarify whether using dye spraying and magnifi− cation at each step contributes to further endoscopic distinction in comparison with the conventional endoscopic view [2]. The overall diagnostic accuracy achieved with chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine with magnification was 95.6 % ± significantly better (by 10% and 5 % respectively) than the accuracy achieved with either the conventional view or with chromoendoscopy without magnification. Therefore, the result of Togashi et al. in relation to the diagnostic accuracy of indigo carmine with magnifi− cation seems to be lower than expected. References 1 Togashi K, Hewett DG, Whitaker DA et al. The use of acetic acid in magnification chromo− colonoscopy for pit pattern analysis of small polyps. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 613 ± 616 2 Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S et al. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non−neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal le− sions: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1089 ± 1093