Perception of color mismatch or conspicuous marginal adaptation in extraoral prostheses with eye-tracking
Tuğgen Özcivelek,Fulya Basmacı,Berna Turgut,Kuddusi Akbulut,Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.021
IF: 4.148
2024-01-01
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Abstract:Statement of problem Color matching and marginal integrity are major challenges when providing extraoral maxillofacial prostheses. Which of the color and marginal harmony features are more important for the extraoral prostheses to be inconspicuous is unclear. Studies on the perception of these prostheses with objective evaluation criteria are lacking. Purpose The purpose of this observational study was to investigate the significance of color mismatch and conspicuous marginal adaptation in the perception of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses using eye-tracking technology. The secondary aim was to evaluate the perception of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses with regard to the observers' sex. Material and methods Twenty-seven face images, in 3 groups, representing well-fitting orbital prostheses with a color mismatch (IC), prostheses with a good color match but distinct marginal adaptation (IM), and symmetrical face images, were viewed for 5 seconds by 52 laypeople. Time to first fixation (TFF), fixation duration (FD), and fixation count (FC) at defined areas of interest were recorded and analyzed by an eye-tracking device. Because of the nested structure of data, a sex- and age-adjusted random intercept linear mixed effects model was used to assess the difference between IC, IM, and SI. Bonferroni corrected P values were used for pairwise comparisons. The difference between observers' sex was evaluated with random intercept mixed model by adjusting for age for each image. For repeated measurement analysis, the lm4, lmerTest, and emmeans libraries in R version 4.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) were used (α=.05 for all tests). Results Significant differences were found between the symmetrical image group and other study groups at the facial prosthesis region in all parameters (each P <.001). Observers first focused on the facial prostheses in IC (0.72 seconds) and in IM (0.789 seconds). Longer fixation durations, 1.909, 1.989 seconds for IC and IM (P IC <.001 , P IM < .001 ) , respectively, and a higher fixation count for IC (5.28) (P <.001 ) and for IM (5.45) (P<. 001 ) were recorded on facial prostheses compared with other areas of interest. Women were more focused on the prosthesis than men in the IC and IM groups considering FD ( P IC =.003, P IM <.001) and FC values ( P IC =.016, P IM <.001, P SI <.001). Fixation duration for women and men was 2.097 seconds and 1.739 seconds in the IC group, 2.219 seconds and 1.78 seconds in the IM group, and 1.364 seconds and 1.222 seconds in the SI group, respectively. Conclusions Since the color mismatch and distinct marginal adaptation of maxillofacial prostheses were recognized using eye-tracking technology, both features appeared to be equally significant to be considered in fabrication procedures.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine