Abstract:Telemedicine use increased substantially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic 1 and has the potential to provide low-acuity medical services at lower costs. 2 However, telemedicine also levies new costs on clinicians. 3 Telemedicine requires shifting care delivery workflows, as it rarely includes clinical support staff but can involve levels of patient complexity similar to in-person visits. 4 ,5 This may increase administrative and electronic health record (EHR) burden for clinicians and increase cognitive costs as clinicians switch modalities. In a recent study, 6 greater weekly telemedicine visit share was associated with increased EHR time, including after-hours time, mostly spent in documentation. Our study aimed to address 2 gaps: first, whether day-to-day changes in telemedicine share demonstrate a similar association with EHR time; and second, what changes occur in domains of EHR use not examined in previous studies (eg, medical record review, orders). This cross-sectional study combined visit modality data with EHR active use data capturing time spent by primary care physicians (PCPs) in the Cerner EHR system from December 2021 through June 2023 at MedStar Health, a large multispecialty health system in the mid-Atlantic region. We calculated PCPs' daily telemedicine share as the percentage of the day's visits conducted via telemedicine and categorized this variable into 5 levels. Because we used deidentified data, this study was deemed exempt and not human participant research by the Georgetown University–MedStar Health Institutional Review Board; we followed the STROBE reporting guideline. Telemedicine visits were identified via registration and scheduling records. We analyzed 5 measures of active EHR time for each PCP-day: total EHR time, documentation time, medical record review time, order time, and next-day documentation time (only for PCP-days with a consecutive qualifying PCP-day). We calculated descriptive statistics and ran ordinary least squares linear regression models, adjusting for visit volume and physician and calendar-day fixed effects. These models estimate the marginal within-clinician association between each telemedicine share level and our outcomes relative to zero-telemedicine days while adjusting for common temporal trends. We used R statistical software, version 3.6.3 (R Project for Statistical Computing) (tidyverse, fixest packages) for analyses, using 2-tailed hypothesis tests (α = .05). The study included 316 PCPs observed across 67 894 PCP-day observations distributed across 5 daily telemedicine share categories (zero daily telemedicine share, 44.7% of all PCP-days; ≤10% share, 17.2%; 11%-25% share, 24.8%; 26%-99% share, 11.1%; and 100% share, 2.2%); mean (SD) overall visit volume, 13.9 (7.2) visits/d (Table). All outcomes demonstrated statistically significant differences across telemedicine share levels. The mean (SD) documentation time for PCPs was 71.3 (54.3) minutes on zero-telemedicine days and 87.1 (50.0) minutes on days with up to 10% telemedicine visits. In regression analyses, days with a mix of visit modalities were associated with significantly greater time for EHR, documentation, and medical record review (Figure). Compared with zero-telemedicine days, 26% to 99% telemedicine days were associated with 14.8 (95% CI, 7.6-22.0) more minutes of active EHR time (5.6% increase, P < .001), 4.7 (95% CI, 1.2-8.3) additional documentation minutes (6.0% increase, P = .01), and 5.5 (95% CI, 2.8-8.2) additional medical record review minutes (6.2% increase, P < .001). Telemedicine share resulted in a negligible increase in order time and had no association with next-day documentation time (Figure). This cross-sectional study found that, during clinic days with both telemedicine and in-person visits, PCPs had 5.6% to 6.2% more EHR-based work. This work did not spill over into next-day documentation, suggesting that PCPs absorbed added time into their workload on mixed-modality days. However, we found that fully telemedicine days were not associated with EHR-based work, contrary to previous findings. 6 We attribute this difference to the small sample of fully telemedicine PCP-days in our study in comparison with prior work 6 (2.2% vs 16.5% of physician-weeks) as well as higher mean visit volume (13.9 visits/d vs 20 visits/wk) (Table). Greater EHR time may be due to increased multitasking during telemedicine visits, as PCPs simultaneously engage with patients and the EHR during telemedicine visits in ways that are not possible in person. This multitasking may feel more efficient and therefore may not register as "burdensome"; further research should explore whether added EHR time associated with mixed-modality days further burdens PCPs. Limitations of our study include our setting of a single health system, lack of inf -Abstract Truncated-

Virtual Scribes and Physician Time Spent on Electronic Health Records

Impact of a Digital Scribe System on Clinical Documentation Time and Quality: Usability Study

Medical Scribes, Provider and Patient Experience, and Patient Throughput: a Trial in an Academic General Internal Medicine Practice

Utilizing remote access for electronic medical records reduces overall electronic medical record time for vascular surgery residents

Assessment of the impact on time to complete medical record using an electronic medical record versus a paper record on emergency department patients: a study

Evaluating a Scribe Program in Reducing Provider Burnout

Measuring Primary Care Exam Length Using Electronic Health Record Data

Impact of virtual visits on primary care physician work flows

Physician Note Composition Patterns and Time on the EHR Across Specialty Types: a National, Cross-sectional Study

Dynamic Comparison of Physicians’ Interaction Style with Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Settings

Impact of a scribe program on patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction in a community-based emergency department

Effect of a National VHA Medical Scribe Pilot on Provider Productivity, Wait Times, and Patient Satisfaction in Cardiology and Orthopedics

Physician use of speech recognition versus typing in clinical documentation: A controlled observational study

Medical Scribes: Symptom or Cause of Impeded Evolution of a Transformative Artificial Intelligence in the Electronic Health Record?

Explaining Variability in Electronic Health Record Effort in Primary Care Ambulatory Encounters

Physician EHR Time and Visit Volume Following Adoption of Team-Based Documentation Support

Share of Telemedicine vs In-Person Visits and Clinician Time Spent in EHR

Impact of electronic health record technology on the work and workflow of physicians in the intensive care unit

Temporal Analysis of Physicians' EHR Workflow During Outpatient Visits

Costs and Productivity Benefits of the Department of Veterans Affairs Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act Scribes Trial

Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems