Specific associations of passively sensed smartphone data with future symptoms of avoidance, fear, and physiological distress in social anxiety
Caitlin A Stamatis,Tingting Liu,Jonah Meyerhoff,Yixuan Meng,Young Min Cho,Chris J Karr,Brenda L Curtis,Lyle H Ungar,David C Mohr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100683
2023-10-13
Abstract:Background: Prior literature links passively sensed information about a person's location, movement, and communication with social anxiety. These findings hold promise for identifying novel treatment targets, informing clinical care, and personalizing digital mental health interventions. However, social anxiety symptoms are heterogeneous; to identify more precise targets and tailor treatments, there is a need for personal sensing studies aimed at understanding differential predictors of the distinct subdomains of social anxiety. Our objective was to conduct a large-scale smartphone-based sensing study of fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms in the context of trait social anxiety over time. Methods: Participants (n = 1013; 74.6 % female; M age = 40.9) downloaded the LifeSense app, which collected continuous passive data (e.g., GPS, communication, app and device use) over 16 weeks. We tested a series of multilevel linear regression models to understand within- and between-person associations of 2-week windows of passively sensed smartphone data with fear, avoidance, and physiological distress on the self-reported Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). A shifting sensor lag was applied to examine how smartphone features related to SPIN subdomains 2 weeks in the future (distal prediction), 1 week in the future (medial prediction), and 0 weeks in the future (proximal prediction). Results: A decrease in time visiting novel places was a strong between-person predictor of social avoidance over time (distal β = -0.886, p = .002; medial β = -0.647, p = .029; proximal β = -0.818, p = .007). Reductions in call- and text-based communications were associated with social avoidance at both the between- (distal β = -0.882, p = .002; medial β = -0.932, p = .001; proximal β = -0.918, p = .001) and within- (distal β = -0.191, p = .046; medial β = -0.213, p = .028) person levels, as well as between-person fear of social situations (distal β = -0.860, p < .001; medial β = -0.892, p < .001; proximal β = -0.886, p < .001) over time. There were fewer significant associations of sensed data with physiological distress. Across the three subscales, smartphone data explained 9-12 % of the variance in social anxiety. Conclusion: Findings have implications for understanding how social anxiety manifests in daily life, and for personalizing treatments. For example, a signal that someone is likely to begin avoiding social situations may suggest a need for alternative types of exposure-based interventions compared to a signal that someone is likely to begin experiencing increased physiological distress. Our results suggest that as a prophylactic means of targeting social avoidance, it may be helpful to deploy interventions involving social exposures in response to decreases in time spent visiting novel places.