In Reference to Quantitative Analysis of Syndecan‐1 Expression in Dysplasia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity

S. Saussez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e318165a9f1
IF: 2.97
2008-05-01
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:We read with interest the report of Drs. Eckard Gehrking, Michael Raap, and Konard D. Sommer regarding “Classification and Management of Tracheoesophageal and Tracheopharyngeal Fistulas after Laryngectomy.”1 The authors are to be congratulated on their proposal of a wellperceived classification of this very common complication. We have concerns, however, about the objective of the study, which is not well stated, because it gives a very evident concluding statement about managing the problem. We would like to propose an additional classification, which could be termed type VI (tracheoesophageal fistula associated with esophageal stenosis/stricture) because, in most of observed cases, esophageal obstruction below the tracheoesophageal puncture is the cause of tracheoesophageal fistula. Type V, in our experience, is very rare. The paper also does not provide information on the number of patients who received radiation or concurrent chemoradiation, the extent of mucosal resection, and the technique of closure, and these are possible predictive factors for the development of a fistula after a surgical voice restoration procedure. Finally, we would like to add that regional flaps such as a deltopectoral flap and pectoralis muscle only or myocutaneous flap has, in our experience, proven to be very useful in the management of fistulae and thus could be added as one therapy option.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?