Assessing ventricular function for risk stratification

C. Conti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960270102
2004-01-01
Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Prognosis of most patients with cardiac disease is related to left ventricular function. Normal ventricular function equates with low risk, and poor ventricular function equates with high risk. When ventricular function is determined by any method, it provides a snapshot at one point in time indicating what might happen in the future. When ventricular function is normal, the warranty for survival on this snapshot is fairly long for populations, but, unfortunately, the warranty can run out at any time in the individual patient. Obviously, assessment of ventricular function at another point in time might show improvement or deterioration and further refine the prognostic implications of this assessment. Thus, ideally, it would be useful to have a method that can be repeated, costs little, and is not potentially harmful to the patient.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?