Abstract:Several studies have proposed grading systems aimed at improving the stratification of risk factors for early lung adenocarcinoma, but the repeatability of high‐grade subtypes is unsatisfactory in clinical practice. In this study, we utilized machine learning algorithms and survival models to construct a novel grading system based on the percentages of lepidic, solid, micropapillary lesions and STAS in a cohort of patients with stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Our study has great value in clinical applications since it is more compact, comprehensible, with better accuracy and reproducibility. Background Several studies have proposed grading systems for risk stratification of early‐stage lung adenocarcinoma based on histological patterns. However, the reproducibility of these systems is poor in clinical practice, indicating the need to develop a new grading system which is easy to apply and has high accuracy in prognostic stratification of patients. Methods Patients with stage I invasive nonmucinous lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively collected from pathology archives between 2009 and 2016. The patients were divided into a training and validation set at a 6:4 ratio. Histological features associated with patient outcomes (overall survival [OS] and progression‐free survival [PFS]) identified in the training set were used to construct a new grading system. The newly proposed system was validated using the validation set. Survival differences between subgroups were assessed using the log‐rank test. The prognostic performance of the novel grading system was compared with two previously proposed systems using the concordance index. Results A total of 539 patients were included in this study. Using a multioutcome decision tree model, four pathological factors, including the presence of tumor spread through air space (STAS) and the percentage of lepidic, micropapillary and solid subtype components, were selected for the proposed grading system. Patients were accordingly classified into three groups: low, medium, and high risk. The high‐risk group showed a 5‐year OS of 52.4% compared to 89.9% and 97.5% in the medium and low‐risk groups, respectively. The 5‐year PFS of patients in the high‐risk group was 38.1% compared to 61.7% and 90.9% in the medium and low‐risk groups, respectively. Similar results were observed in the subgroup analysis. Additionally, our proposed grading system provided superior prognostic stratification compared to the other two systems with a higher concordance index. Conclusion The newly proposed grading system based on four pathological factors (presence of STAS, and percentage of lepidic, micropapillary, and solid subtypes) exhibits high accuracy and good reproducibility in the prognostic stratification of stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients.

The new IASLC grading system for invasive non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma is a more useful indicator of patient survival compared with previous grading systems

Validation Study of New IASLC Histology Grading System in Stage I Non-Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Comparing With Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma

[Prognostic Significance of a Newly Proposed Grading and Scoring System in Stage I Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma].

Validation of the Novel International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma and Association with Common Driver Mutations.

Proposed novel grading system for stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma and a comparison with the 2020 IASLC grading system

A Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Proposal From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee

Prognostic impact of the IASLC grading system of lung adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Prognostic and predictive value of the newly proposed grading system of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma in Chinese patients: a retrospective multicohort study

Prognostic impact of the newly revised IASLC proposed grading system for invasive lung adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Significant difference in recurrence according to the proportion of high grade patterns in stage IA lung adenocarcinoma

Frozen Sections Accurately Predict the IASLC Proposed Grading System and Prognosis in Patients with Invasive Lung Adenocarcinomas

Prognostic Value of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Grading System and its Association with the Tumor Microenvironment in Stage I EGFR-muted Lung Adenocarcinoma

Prognostic impact of pattern-based grading system by the new IASLC/ATS/ERS classification in Asian patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma

The Grading System for Lung Adenocarcinoma: Brief Review of its Prognostic Performance and Future Directions

IASLC grading system predicts distant metastases for resected lung adenocarcinoma

Integrating IASLC grading and radiomics for predicting postoperative outcomes in stage IA invasive lung adenocarcinoma

The role of extensive lymph node dissection in the new grading system for lung adenocarcinoma

The prognostic value of histopathology in invasive lung adenocarcinoma: a comparative review of the main proposed grading systems

Preoperative Prognostic Prediction for Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas: Impact of the Computed Tomography Features Associated with the New Histological Grading System

Grading of Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: a Novel Prognostic System Based on Tumor Budding and Cell Cluster Size.

Abstract 3782: IASLC grading system predict distant metastases for resected lung adenocarcinoma