The relevance of international studies for design of a U.S. national health program.

M. Roemer

1971-08-01

Abstract:Americans interested in international health seem to fall into three main categories that might be called: (1) the missionaries, (2) the diplomats, and (3) the transmitters. If I may be forgiven for some oversimplification, the missionaries are those Americans who like most to work in the under-developed countries (an adjective that, along with Gunnar Myrdal, I still prefer to the more fashionable but less meaningful "developing"), bringing to these countries the technical know-how of the wealthier, industrialized powers. The diplomats are those who like most to work within the international agencies facilitating the exchange of ideas between and among all sorts of nations. The transmitters are those Americans who wish to learn from other countries lessons that can be usefully applied to achieve better health service for the millions of people in our own country. Richard Weinerman was in the third of these categories. His interests and contributions in international health studies were mainly directed toward transmitting lessons from the experience of other countries toward solution of difficult problems in the United States. Toward the end of Dick's life, he was beginning to show some interest in the other two spheres, but his contribution as a transmitter was substantial. Dick Weinerman had his first overseas experience in World War II as a Captain in the U.S. Army Medical Corps, serving as Chief of a Combat Shock Team in Europe. I had the pleasure of meeting him first in 1945, when he had just returned, still in uniform with combat ribbons, tired but aglow with the victorious defeat of Fascism, and eager to enter public health work in his native land. In 1950, while on the faculty of the University of California School of Public Health at Berkeley, Dick made his first international health study. As a travelling fellow of the World Health Organization, he visited Great Britain, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, and France. His primary focus was to study teaching and research in social medicine at the universities of these countries, but he did not lose the opportunity to study at the same time the organizational structure of the public health and medical