Abstract:Background: BRAF, a key modulator of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway, is observed in 7% of all cancers. Therapeutic response to MAPK inhibition (MAPKi) often relies on molecular distinctions between members of varying classes: Class 1 (V600), Class 2 and 3 (non-V600) BRAF mutants. Preliminary data indicates that co-occurring RAS mutations in non-V600 BRAF mutant cancers are less responsive to MAPKi treatment. This emphasizes the need to investigate the characteristics of RAS co-mutations in non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors. Methods: Genomic data was obtained from a cohort of 183,292 patients provided by the AACR GENIE database (v14.1). Patient samples were clustered according to their BRAF mutation status and co-occurring K/NRAS mutations: WT BRAF (n=60,845) vs. non-V600 BRAF (n=1009). Samples were grouped based on cancer type: melanoma (n=3841), colorectal (n=15,434), and non-small cell lung cancer (n=14640) and were further categorized according to key biochemical features of RAS GTPase function and overall GTPase activity. Results: This dataset revealed a diverse array of allelic variants of K/NRAS between cancer types and their underlying BRAF mutation status (Table 1). Non-V600 BRAF mutant cancers showed an enrichment for KRAS mutations linked to amplified nucleotide exchange (37.9% vs. 13.4%; p<0.0001) and hydrolysis-impairing NRAS mutations (41.9% vs. 23%; p<0.0001), compared to WT BRAF cancers. Rare allelic variants including KRAS L19F, KRAS A146T, and NRAS G60E were seen in Class 2/3 BRAF mutants. Conclusion: This data suggests that non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors are characterized by a unique distribution of RAS mutations. More research into the difference in downstream effectors of RAS mutants overrepresented in non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors could provide important insights into how these tumors develop and resist targeted therapies. Table 1. Classification of KRAS and NRAS mutations in WT BRAF vs. non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors GTPase Function Cancer Type All cancers NSCLC Colorectal Melanoma BRAF mutation WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value KRASmutation class Impaired hydrolysis n=20731 (79.8%) n=167 (51.9%) <0.0001 n=6068 (86.1%) n=60 (56.6%) <0.0001 n=4799 (68.2%) n=16 (29.1%) <0.0001 n=38 (48.1%) n=13 (50.0%) 0.4047 Nucleotide Exchange n=3475 (13.4%) n=122 (37.9%) n=530 (7.5%) n=36 (34.0%) n=1842 (26.2%) n=36 (65.5%) n=30 (38.0%) n=12 (46.2%) Hybrid n=1765 (6.8%) n=33 (10.2%) n=446 (6.3%) n=10 (9.4%) n=395 (5.6%) n=3 (5.5%) n=11 (13.9%) n=1 (3.8%) NRAS mutation class Impaired hydrolysis n = 974 (23.0%) n=78 (41.9%) <0.0001 n=29 (18.7%) n=9 (39.1%) 0.0196 n=188 (32.6%) n=17 (68.0%) <0.0001 n=86 (5.5%) n=22 (27.8%) <0.0001 Nucleotide Exchange n=459 (10.8%) n=22 (11.8%) n=5 (3.2%) n=2 (8.7%) n=48 (8.3%) n=4 (16.0%) n=93 (5.9%) n=10 (12.7%) Hybrid n=2811 (66.2%) n=86 (46.2%) n=121 (78.1%) n=12 (52.2%) n=341 (59.1%) n=4 (16.0%) n=1385 (88.6%) n=47 (59.5%) GTPase Activity BRAF mutation WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value KRASmutation class Intermediate activity n=14408 (55.3%) n=142 (44.4%) 0.0001 n=5082 (72.3%) n=54 (50.5%) <0.0001 n=3540 (49.9%) n=17 (31.5%) 0.0089 n=46 (56.8%) n=13 (50.0%) 0.6516 High activity n=11630 (44.7%) n=178 (55.6%) n=1947 (27.7%) n=53 (49.5%) n=3552 (50.1%) n=37 (68.5%) n=35 (43.2%) n=13 (50.0%) NRAS mutation class Intermediate activity n=1364 (32.2%) n=101 (55.8%) <0.0001 n=36 (23.4%) n=12 (54.5%) 0.0041 n=239 (41.8%) n=20 (87.0%) <0.0001 n=190 (12.3%) n=34 (43.0%) <0.0001 High activity n=2868 (67.8%) n=80 (44.2%) n=118 (76.6%) n=10 (45.5%) n=333 (58.2%) n=3 (13.0%) n=1357 (87.7%) n=45 (57.0%) Citation Format: Chantel L. Mukonoweshuro, Emmanuelle Rousselle, April A. Rose. Exploring the mutational landscape of KRAS and NRAS in tumors with non-V600 BRAF mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular s); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl) nr 5063.

Genomic Landscapes and Hallmarks of Mutant RAS in Human Cancers

Co-Mutation Landscape and Clinical Significance of RAS Pathway Related Gene Mutations in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Abstract B089: Oncogenic signaling and responses to treatment in RAS mutant cancers are mutation-specific

Targeting RAS mutants in malignancies: successes, failures, and reasons for hope

Clinical and genomic landscape of RAS mutations in gynecologic cancers

Supplementary Data from Genomic Landscapes and Hallmarks of Mutant RAS in Human Cancers

Impact of RAS mutation subtype on clinical outcome—a cross-entity comparison of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer

Data from Tissue-Specific Oncogenic Activity of KRAS<sup>A146T</sup>

The prominent pervasive oncogenic role and tissue specific permissiveness of RAS gene mutations

Abstract 5063: Exploring the mutational landscape of KRAS and NRAS in tumors with non-V600 BRAF mutations

RAS mutations in myeloid malignancies: revisiting old questions with novel insights and therapeutic perspectives

RAS oncogenes: weaving a tumorigenic web

Mutations matter: An observational study of the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer

Emerging strategies to target RAS signaling in human cancer therapy

Tumor RAS Gene Expression Levels Are Influenced by the Mutational Status of RAS Genes and Both Upstream and Downstream RAS Pathway Genes

Abstract 2494: RAS-Bio a unique pan-cancer biobank for RAS-driven tumors

RAS signaling in carcinogenesis, cancer therapy and resistance mechanisms

Rationale for RAS mutation-tailored therapies

KRAS Mutation in Rare Tumors: A Landscape Analysis of 3453 Chinese Patients

Modeling RAS phenotype in colorectal cancer uncovers novel molecular traits of RAS dependency and improves prediction of response to targeted agents in patients

Clinical/molecular features and prognostic significance of RAS mutant-low versus RAS mutant-high in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.